IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p2826-d1365771.html

Does ESG Performance Affect the Enterprise Value of China’s Heavily Polluting Listed Companies?

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, 99 Songling Road, Qingdao 266061, China)

  • Xiaotong Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, 99 Songling Road, Qingdao 266061, China)

  • Wei Guo

    (School of Economics and Management, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, 99 Songling Road, Qingdao 266061, China)

  • Xinlei Guo

    (School of Economics and Management, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, 99 Songling Road, Qingdao 266061, China)

  • Qisheng Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051, China)

  • Xin Tan

    (School of Economics and Management, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, 99 Songling Road, Qingdao 266061, China)

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on the enterprise value of heavily polluting listed companies in China’s Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share markets. The study found that ESG performance helps to improve the corporate value of heavily polluting listed companies, and ESG performance has an impact mechanism effect on the corporate value of heavily polluting listed companies through green technology innovation, financing costs, and internal control; the analysis of heterogeneity is conducted from three different perspectives: resource endowment, ownership nature, and overseas background of senior executives. At the same time, the interaction term ESG × EPU is employed to examine the regulatory effect of economic policy uncertainty Non-state-owned enterprises can enhance their enterprise value more effectively by improving their ESG performance based on the research findings. The ESG performance of heavy polluting enterprises in non-resource-based cities has a more obvious role in promoting corporate value; in companies where executives have overseas backgrounds, ESG performance is more conducive to the improvement of corporate value. The empirical evidence derived from the research findings rationalizes the connection between the of ESG performance and enterprise value in industries with high levels of pollution, as well as the pathway of impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Zhang & Xiaotong Wang & Wei Guo & Xinlei Guo & Qisheng Wang & Xin Tan, 2024. "Does ESG Performance Affect the Enterprise Value of China’s Heavily Polluting Listed Companies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2826-:d:1365771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2826/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2826/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandre Sanches Garcia & Renato J. Orsato, 2020. "Testing the institutional difference hypothesis: A study about environmental, social, governance, and financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3261-3272, December.
    2. Sackley H. W. & Vashakmadze T. T., 2014. "The enhancement of equity valuations in developed and emerging markets through the use of sustainable investment indicators," Journal of Corporate Finance Research Корпоративные финансы, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», issue 2 (30), pages 53-57.
    3. Dai, Liyan & Song, Chengxuan & You, Yu & Zhang, Wenqiao, 2022. "Do sovereign wealth funds value ESG engagement? Evidence from target firm's CSR performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    4. Amal Aouadi & Sylvain Marsat, 2018. "Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 1027-1047, September.
    5. Nicholas Bloom, 2009. "The Impact of Uncertainty Shocks," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 623-685, May.
    6. Zhao, Wenjia & Liang, Yiyan & Li, Pan, 2023. "Can enterprises' participation in targeted poverty alleviation reduce the cost of debt financing? Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    7. Muhammad Sadiq & Jaspal Singh & Muhammad Raza & Shafi Mohamad, 2020. "The Impact of Environmental, Social and Governance Index on Firm Value: Evidence from Malaysia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 555-562.
    8. Guanghua Xie & Jianlin Chen & Ying Hao & Jing Lu, 2021. "Economic Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Investment Behavior: Evidence from China’s Five-Year Plan Cycles," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(10), pages 2977-2994, August.
    9. Anita, Mendiratta & Shveta, Singh & Yadav Surendra, S. & Arvind, Mahajan, 2023. "When do ESG controversies reduce firm value in India?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    10. Rojo-Suárez, Javier & Alonso-Conde, Ana B., 2023. "Short-run and long-run effects of ESG policies on value creation and the cost of equity of firms," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 599-616.
    11. Cailou Jiang & Dehai Liu, 2024. "Effects of venture capital on green technology innovation in new energy vehicle industry in China," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(1), pages 418-437, February.
    12. Muhammad Azeem Qureshi & Sina Kirkerud & Kim Theresa & Tanveer Ahsan, 2020. "The impact of sustainability (environmental, social, and governance) disclosure and board diversity on firm value: The moderating role of industry sensitivity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1199-1214, March.
    13. Campello, Murillo & Kankanhalli, Gaurav & Kim, Hyunseob, 2024. "Delayed creative destruction: How uncertainty shapes corporate assets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuxuan Zhang & Leihong Yuan, 2025. "The Effect of ESG Performance on Aggressive Tax Planning in China: The Moderating Role of Internal Control," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sakhr Bani-Khaled & Graça Azevedo & Jonas Oliveira, 2025. "Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors and firm value: A systematic literature review of theories and empirical evidence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 15(1), pages 228-260, June.
    2. Chung, Yessica C.Y. & Kunene, Noxolo & Chang, Hung-Hao, 2024. "Renewable energy certificates and firm value: Empirical evidence in Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Rodrigo Zeidan, 2022. "Why don't asset managers accelerate ESG investing? A sentiment analysis based on 13,000 messages from finance professionals," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3028-3039, November.
    4. Alan Kai Ming Au & Yi-Fan Yang & Huan Wang & Rui-Hong Chen & Leven J. Zheng, 2023. "Mapping the Landscape of ESG Strategies: A Bibliometric Review and Recommendations for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Jiunan Ji & Junrui Zhang & Wen Qu, 2025. "Research on the Influence Mechanism of Environment Social Government Performance in State-Owned Enterprise Value: The Role of Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Raffaela Casciello & Rosalinda Santonastaso & Martina Prisco & Ilaria Martino, 2024. "Green innovation and financial performance. The role of R&D investments and ESG disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 5372-5390, November.
    7. Musah Mohammed Saeed & Shahin Sultana Mohammed & Manisha Kumari & Ghanshyam Pandey, 2025. "The impact of corporate environmental reporting on the financial performance of listed manufacturing firms in Ghana (Csr‐24‐2036)," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 1230-1244, January.
    8. Simona Galletta & Sebastiano Mazzù & Valeria Naciti, 2021. "Banks' business strategy and environmental effectiveness: The monitoring role of the board of directors and the managerial incentives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2656-2670, July.
    9. Anshul Mandliya & Jatin Pandey & Shrihari Suresh Sohani & Rayees Ahmad Sheikh, 2025. "From union clout to corporate couture: Unveiling the impact of trade unions on corporate social responsibility," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Rachana Manoj Lunawat & Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Doaa Shohaieb, 2025. "Integrating Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Factors into the Investment Returns of American Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Arinze Christian Nwoba & Nathaniel Boso & Matthew J. Robson, 2021. "Corporate sustainability strategies in institutional adversity: Antecedent, outcome, and contingency effects," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 787-807, February.
    12. Chen, Kejie & Xie, Jie, 2025. "Digital trade and corporate ESG performance— evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Anrafel Souza Barbosa & Maria Cristina Basilio Crispim Silva & Luiz Bueno Silva & Sandra Naomi Morioka & Vinícius Fernandes Souza, 2023. "Integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria: their impacts on corporate sustainability performance," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Inmaculada Bel‐Oms, 2025. "Determinants and consequences of environmental, social and governance controversies. Status quo and limitations of recent empirical quantitative research," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 2412-2437, March.
    15. Kim, Kyunghyun & Seo, Seongmin, 2025. "The impact of the Serious Accidents Punishment Act on corporate ESG: Evidence from Korea," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    16. Khan, Muhammad Arif, 2022. "ESG disclosure and Firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    17. Ben Amor, Salma & Kooli, Maher, 2025. "Does materiality matter in ESG investing?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    18. Chang Liu & Zihao Xin, 2024. "Does environmental, social, and governance practice boost corporate human capital inflow in China? From the perspective of stakeholder response," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3251-3273, July.
    19. Teplova, T. & Sokolova, T. & Kissa, D. & Gurov, S., 2026. "ESG indicators as determinants of the risk of a decline in Russian stock prices in different periods: A view of Explainable AI," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 70(1), pages 157-190.
    20. Wu, Zihao & Lin, Siliang & Chen, Tianhao & Luo, Chunyang & Xu, Hui, 2023. "Does effective corporate governance mitigate the negative effect of ESG controversies on firm value?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1772-1793.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2826-:d:1365771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.