IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i6p2565-d1360820.html

Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Agro-Industrial Waste Mixtures for Biogas Production: An Energetically Sustainable Solution

Author

Listed:
  • Diógenes Hernández

    (Departamento de Tecnologías Industriales, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Talca, Merced 437, Curicó 3341717, Chile
    Institute of Chemistry of Natural Resources, University of Talca, Talca 3460000, Chile)

  • Fernando Pinilla

    (Departamento de Tecnologías Industriales, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Talca, Merced 437, Curicó 3341717, Chile)

  • Ricardo Rebolledo-Leiva

    (CRETUS, Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
    Department of Computing and Industries, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Universidad Católica del Maule, Av. San Miguel 3605, Talca 3460000, Chile)

  • Joaquín Aburto-Hole

    (Departamento de Tecnologías Industriales, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Talca, Merced 437, Curicó 3341717, Chile)

  • Joaquín Díaz

    (Departamento de Tecnologías Industriales, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Talca, Merced 437, Curicó 3341717, Chile)

  • Guillermo Quijano

    (Laboratory for Research on Advanced Processes of Water Treatment, Juriquilla Academic Unit, Engineering Institute, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Blvd. Juriquilla 3001, Queretaro 76230, Mexico)

  • Sara González-García

    (CRETUS, Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

  • Claudio Tenreiro

    (Departamento de Tecnologías Industriales, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Talca, Merced 437, Curicó 3341717, Chile)

Abstract

In a climate crisis, searching for renewable energy sources is urgent and mandatory to achieve a low-carbon society. The food industry is an attractive source for providing different organic waste with great potential for energy generation, avoiding the environmental impacts of its inadequate management at the disposal stage. This manuscript determines the feasibility of using three agro-industrial byproducts for biogas production with a mesophilic anaerobic digestion process. Three mixture samples such as tomato pulp with olive cake (TP-OC), apple pomace with olive cake (AP-OC), and tomato pulp with apple pomace (TP-AP) at a 1:1 w / w ratio were evaluated using bovine manure as inoculum. During 7 to 12 days of operation, results indicate that TP-OC achieved the highest biogas production yield with 1096 mL/L (with up to 70% methane), followed by AP-OC and TP-AP with 885 (62% methane) and 574 mL/L (69% methane), respectively. Experimentally, TP-OC consistently encompassed the highest biogas and methane production and fit the kinetic models, whereas the modified Gompertz model produced the best fit (R 2 = 99.7%). This manuscript supports the preference for mixing byproducts from the agro-industrial sector rather than using them individually for biogas production.

Suggested Citation

  • Diógenes Hernández & Fernando Pinilla & Ricardo Rebolledo-Leiva & Joaquín Aburto-Hole & Joaquín Díaz & Guillermo Quijano & Sara González-García & Claudio Tenreiro, 2024. "Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Agro-Industrial Waste Mixtures for Biogas Production: An Energetically Sustainable Solution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2565-:d:1360820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2565/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2565/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yaashikaa, P.R. & Kumar, P. Senthil, 2022. "Valorization of agro-industrial wastes for biorefinery process and circular bioeconomy: A critical review," MPRA Paper 112234, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Scarlat, Nicolae & Dallemand, Jean-François & Fahl, Fernando, 2018. "Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 457-472.
    3. Bolen, T.J. & Hasan, Mahmudul & Conway, Timothy & Stéphane Yaméogo, Djigui David & Sanchez, Pablo & Rahman, Arifur & Azam, Hossain, 2022. "Feasibility assessment of biogas production from the anaerobic co-digestion of cheese whey, grease interceptor waste and pulped food waste for WRRF," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Morán-Alarcón, Luis Carlos & Galán-Martín, Ángel & Contreras, María del Mar & Castro, Eulogio, 2026. "Recent advances and future perspectives in the valorization of olive biomass for sustainable biorefinery applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 226(PD).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Małgorzata Pawłowska & Magdalena Zdeb & Marta Bis & Lucjan Pawłowski, 2025. "State and Perspectives of Biomethane Production and Use—A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-43, May.
    2. Mac Clay, Pablo & Börner, Jan & Sellare, Jorge, 2023. "Institutional and macroeconomic stability mediate the effect of auctions on renewable energy capacity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Amar Naji & Sabrina Guérin Rechdaoui & Elise Jabagi & Carlyne Lacroix & Sam Azimi & Vincent Rocher, 2023. "Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Wastewater Sludge with Lignocellulosic Waste: A Study of Performance and Limits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Zuzana Kapsdorferová & Tomasz Rokicki & Andrzej Parzonko & Lisa Holden, 2024. "Perspectives of Electricity Production from Biogas in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Fernandez, Helen Coarita & Buffiere, Pierre & Bayard, Rémy, 2022. "Understanding the role of mechanical pretreatment before anaerobic digestion: Lab-scale investigations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 193-203.
    6. Justyna Górka & Małgorzata Cimochowicz-Rybicka & Dominika Poproch, 2022. "Sludge Management at the Kraków-Płaszów WWTP—Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-11, June.
    7. Dumitru Peni & Marcin Dębowski & Mariusz Jerzy Stolarski, 2022. "Influence of the Fertilization Method on the Silphium perfoliatum Biomass Composition and Methane Fermentation Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Duan, Yumin & Wang, Zhi & Ganeshan, Prabakaran & Sar, Taner & Xu, Suyun & Rajendran, Karthik & Sindhu, Raveendran & Binod, Parameswaran & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang & Taherzadeh, Mohammad J. & A, 2025. "Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production for sustainable bioeconomy: Potential and research challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    9. Maktabifard, Mojtaba & Al-Hazmi, Hussein E. & Szulc, Paulina & Mousavizadegan, Mohammad & Xu, Xianbao & Zaborowska, Ewa & Li, Xiang & Mąkinia, Jacek, 2023. "Net-zero carbon condition in wastewater treatment plants: A systematic review of mitigation strategies and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    10. Sofia Dahlgren & Jonas Ammenberg, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Public Transport, Part II—Applying a Multi-Criteria Assessment Method to Compare Different Bus Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, January.
    11. Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Tomasz Kulupa & Adrianna Kubiak & Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka & Krzysztof Pilarski & Alicja Niewiadomska, 2023. "Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste—A Short Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-23, August.
    12. Park, Min-Ju & Kim, Hak-Min & Gu, Yun-Jeong & Jeong, Dae-Woon, 2023. "Optimization of biogas-reforming conditions considering carbon formation, hydrogen production, and energy efficiencies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    13. Elena Tamburini & Mattias Gaglio & Giuseppe Castaldelli & Elisa Anna Fano, 2020. "Is Bioenergy Truly Sustainable When Land-Use-Change (LUC) Emissions Are Accounted for? The Case-Study of Biogas from Agricultural Biomass in Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Oliva, Armando & Papirio, Stefano & Pirozzi, Francesco & Esposito, Giovanni & Lens, Piet N.L., 2025. "Inoculum dependence of methane formation from lignocellulosic biowastes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    15. Anca-Couce, A. & Hochenauer, C. & Scharler, R., 2021. "Bioenergy technologies, uses, market and future trends with Austria as a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    16. Pochwatka, Patrycja & Rozakis, Stelios & Kowalczyk-Juśko, Alina & Czekała, Wojciech & Qiao, Wei & Nägele, Hans-Joachim & Janczak, Damian & Mazurkiewicz, Jakub & Mazur, Andrzej & Dach, Jacek, 2023. "The energetic and economic analysis of demand-driven biogas plant investment possibility in dairy farm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    17. Psarros, Georgios N. & Papathanassiou, Stavros A., 2023. "Generation scheduling in island systems with variable renewable energy sources: A literature review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1105-1124.
    18. Bedoić, Robert & Dorotić, Hrvoje & Schneider, Daniel Rolph & Čuček, Lidija & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2021. "Synergy between feedstock gate fee and power-to-gas: An energy and economic analysis of renewable methane production in a biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 12-23.
    19. Gul, Eid & Baldinelli, Giorgio & Bartocci, Pietro & Shamim, Tariq & Domenighini, Piergiovanni & Cotana, Franco & Wang, Jinwen & Fantozzi, Francesco & Bianchi, Francesco, 2023. "Transition toward net zero emissions - Integration and optimization of renewable energy sources: Solar, hydro, and biomass with the local grid station in central Italy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 672-686.
    20. Herbes, Carsten & Rilling, Benedikt & Ringel, Marc, 2021. "Policy frameworks and voluntary markets for biomethane – How do different policies influence providers’ product strategies?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2565-:d:1360820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.