IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v265y2023ics0360544222031590.html

Optimization of biogas-reforming conditions considering carbon formation, hydrogen production, and energy efficiencies

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Min-Ju
  • Kim, Hak-Min
  • Gu, Yun-Jeong
  • Jeong, Dae-Woon

Abstract

Hydrogen production from biogas requires energy efficiency. This study systemically compared pure biogas reforming, CO2-free biogas steam reforming, and biogas steam reforming. A comprehensive evaluation combining thermodynamic analysis, energy efficiency evaluation, and experimental validation was performed to compare the reaction types. Biogas steam reforming is the most attractive reforming reaction because it has the lowest SEC. In addition, the main parameters for the reaction conditions were investigated to optimize hydrogen production from biogas. The optimal conditions for the biogas steam reforming were determined as 750 °C and an H2O/CH4 ratio of 1.5. Finally, the previously developed Ni–MgO–CeZrO2 catalyst was tested under the optimized reaction conditions. Consequently, the catalyst showed high catalytic performance and was maintained for 30 h, even at a high GHSV of 36 000 h−1. This result implies that the optimized reaction condition derived by comparing the various indicators such as conversion of reactants, yield of products, energy consumption, and thermal efficiency is suitable for hydrogen production from biogas.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Min-Ju & Kim, Hak-Min & Gu, Yun-Jeong & Jeong, Dae-Woon, 2023. "Optimization of biogas-reforming conditions considering carbon formation, hydrogen production, and energy efficiencies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:265:y:2023:i:c:s0360544222031590
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222031590
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126273?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Qidong & Xia, Lingchao & He, Qijiao & Guo, Zengjia & Ni, Meng, 2021. "Thermo-electrochemical modelling of high temperature methanol-fuelled solid oxide fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    2. Jang, Won-Jun & Jeong, Dae-Woon & Shim, Jae-Oh & Kim, Hak-Min & Han, Won-Bi & Bae, Jong Wook & Roh, Hyun-Seog, 2015. "Metal oxide (MgO, CaO, and La2O3) promoted Ni-Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 catalysts for H2 and CO production from two major greenhouse gases," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 91-95.
    3. Scarlat, Nicolae & Dallemand, Jean-François & Fahl, Fernando, 2018. "Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 457-472.
    4. Omer, A.M. & Fadalla, Y., 2003. "Biogas energy technology in Sudan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 499-507.
    5. Furtado Amaral, Andre & Previtali, Daniele & Bassani, Andrea & Italiano, Cristina & Palella, Alessandra & Pino, Lidia & Vita, Antonio & Bozzano, Giulia & Pirola, Carlo & Manenti, Flavio, 2020. "Biogas beyond CHP: The HPC (heat, power & chemicals) process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    6. Xue, Shengrong & Song, Jinghui & Wang, Xiaojiao & Shang, Zezhou & Sheng, Chenjing & Li, Chongyuan & Zhu, Yufan & Liu, Jingyu, 2020. "A systematic comparison of biogas development and related policies between China and Europe and corresponding insights," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    7. Hajizadeh, Abdollah & Mohamadi-Baghmolaei, Mohamad & Cata Saady, Noori M. & Zendehboudi, Sohrab, 2022. "Hydrogen production from biomass through integration of anaerobic digestion and biogas dry reforming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    8. Capa, A. & García, R. & Chen, D. & Rubiera, F. & Pevida, C. & Gil, M.V., 2020. "On the effect of biogas composition on the H2 production by sorption enhanced steam reforming (SESR)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 575-583.
    9. Abdeen Mustafa Omer, 2003. "Energy in Sudan," International Journal of Global Energy Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(4), pages 289-309.
    10. Lee, Junyoung & Kim, Sunghoon & Kim, Yong Tae & Kwak, Geunjae & Kim, Jiyong, 2020. "Full carbon upcycling of landfill gas into methanol by integrating CO2 hydrogenation and methane reforming: Process development and techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    11. Nahar, Gaurav & Mote, Dhananjay & Dupont, Valerie, 2017. "Hydrogen production from reforming of biogas: Review of technological advances and an Indian perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1032-1052.
    12. Jang, Won-Jun & Jeong, Dae-Woon & Shim, Jae-Oh & Kim, Hak-Min & Roh, Hyun-Seog & Son, In Hyuk & Lee, Seung Jae, 2016. "Combined steam and carbon dioxide reforming of methane and side reactions: Thermodynamic equilibrium analysis and experimental application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 80-91.
    13. Pashchenko, Dmitry, 2019. "Combined methane reforming with a mixture of methane combustion products and steam over a Ni-based catalyst: An experimental and thermodynamic study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 573-584.
    14. Rosha, Pali & Mohapatra, Saroj Kumar & Mahla, Sunil Kumar & Dhir, Amit, 2019. "Hydrogen enrichment of biogas via dry and autothermal-dry reforming with pure nickel (Ni) nanoparticle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 733-739.
    15. Chung, Wei-Chieh & Chang, Moo-Been, 2016. "Review of catalysis and plasma performance on dry reforming of CH4 and possible synergistic effects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 13-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Venko Beschkov & Evgeniy Ganev, 2023. "Perspectives on the Development of Technologies for Hydrogen as a Carrier of Sustainable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Liu, Ji & Sun, Huai-de & Hu, Si-Han & Hu, Bin & Fang, Zhi-mo & Li, Ji-hong & Zhang, Zhen-xi & Lu, Qiang, 2024. "Hydrogen production from the steam reforming of biogas over Ni-based catalyst: The role of promoters and supports," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    3. Juan Félix González & Carmen María Álvez-Medina & Sergio Nogales-Delgado, 2023. "Biogas Steam Reforming in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Opportunities and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-35, September.
    4. Dhruv Singh & Piero Sirini & Lidia Lombardi, 2024. "Review of Reforming Processes for the Production of Green Hydrogen from Landfill Gas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-35, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dang, Chengxiong & Xia, Huanhuan & Yuan, Shuting & Wei, Xingchuan & Cai, Weiquan, 2022. "Green hydrogen production from sorption-enhanced steam reforming of biogas over a Pd/Ni–CaO-mayenite multifunctional catalyst," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 314-322.
    2. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    3. Wang, Xuemei & Yan, Rui & Zhao, Yuying & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Yang, Shuo & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Li, Zifu, 2020. "Biogas standard system in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1265-1273.
    4. Jiapei Wei & Gefu Liang & James Alex & Tongchao Zhang & Chunbo Ma, 2020. "Research Progress of Energy Utilization of Agricultural Waste in China: Bibliometric Analysis by Citespace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Kabbashi M. Suliman, 2013. "Factors Affecting the Choice of Households’ Primary Cooking Fuel in Sudan," Working Papers 760, Economic Research Forum, revised Jun 2013.
    6. Katuwal, Hari & Bohara, Alok K., 2009. "Biogas: A promising renewable technology and its impact on rural households in Nepal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2668-2674, December.
    7. Smith, Jo U. & Fischer, Anke & Hallett, Paul D. & Homans, Hilary Y. & Smith, Pete & Abdul-Salam, Yakubu & Emmerling, Hanna H. & Phimister, Euan, 2015. "Sustainable use of organic resources for bioenergy, food and water provision in rural Sub-Saharan Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 903-917.
    8. Gudina Terefe Tucho & Henri C. Moll & Anton J. M. Schoot Uiterkamp & Sanderine Nonhebel, 2016. "Problems with Biogas Implementation in Developing Countries from the Perspective of Labor Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Omer AM, 2018. "Advanced in Biomass and Biogas Energy," Current Trends in Biomedical Engineering & Biosciences, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 11(1), pages 21-33, January.
    10. Wu, Di & Li, Lei & Peng, Yun & Yang, Pingjin & Peng, Xuya & Sun, Yongming & Wang, Xiaoming, 2021. "State indicators of anaerobic digestion: A critical review on process monitoring and diagnosis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    11. Pallavicini, Jacopo & Fedeli, Matteo & Scolieri, Giacomo Domenico & Tagliaferri, Francesca & Parolin, Jacopo & Sironi, Selena & Manenti, Flavio, 2023. "Digital twin-based optimization and demo-scale validation of absorption columns using sodium hydroxide/water mixtures for the purification of biogas streams subject to impurity fluctuations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    12. Amigun, B. & von Blottnitz, H., 2010. "Capacity-cost and location-cost analyses for biogas plants in Africa," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 63-73.
    13. Roopnarain, Ashira & Adeleke, Rasheed, 2017. "Current status, hurdles and future prospects of biogas digestion technology in Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1162-1179.
    14. Kinyua, Maureen N. & Rowse, Laurel E. & Ergas, Sarina J., 2016. "Review of small-scale tubular anaerobic digesters treating livestock waste in the developing world," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 896-910.
    15. Surendra, K.C. & Takara, Devin & Hashimoto, Andrew G. & Khanal, Samir Kumar, 2014. "Biogas as a sustainable energy source for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 846-859.
    16. Siang, T.J. & Jalil, A.A. & Abdulrasheed, A.A. & Hambali, H.U. & Nabgan, Walid, 2020. "Thermodynamic equilibrium study of altering methane partial oxidation for Fischer–Tropsch synfuel production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    17. Avcioğlu, A. Onurbaş & Türker, U., 2012. "Status and potential of biogas energy from animal wastes in Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 1557-1561.
    18. Karthik Rajendran & Solmaz Aslanzadeh & Mohammad J. Taherzadeh, 2012. "Household Biogas Digesters—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-32, August.
    19. Wakeel, Muhammad & Hayat, Tasawer & Shah, Noor Samad & Iqbal, Jibran & Haq Khan, Zia Ul & Shah, Ghulam Mustafa & Rasool, Atta, 2023. "Biogas Energy Resources in Pakistan Status, Potential, and Barriers," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    20. Faisal Nawab & Ag Sufiyan Abd Hamid & Muhammad Arif & Tufial A. Khan & Amir Naveed & Muhammad Sadiq & Sahibzada Imad Ud din & Adnan Ibrahim, 2022. "Solar–Biogas Microgrid: A Strategy for the Sustainable Development of Rural Communities in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-15, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:265:y:2023:i:c:s0360544222031590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.