IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i20p8838-d1497177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cleaning Up Metal Contamination after Decades of Energy Production and Manufacturing: Reviewing the Value in Use of Biochars for a Sustainable Future

Author

Listed:
  • Priyanka

    (School of Engineering, Chemical Engineering, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
    Department of Chemistry and Centre for Advanced Studies in Chemistry, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Isobel E. Wood

    (School of Engineering, Chemical Engineering, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
    Energy and Environment Institute, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU6 7RX, UK
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Amthal Al-Gailani

    (School of Engineering, Chemical Engineering, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU6 7RX, UK)

  • Ben W. Kolosz

    (Energy and Environment Institute, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU6 7RX, UK)

  • Kin Wai Cheah

    (School of Computing, Engineering & Digital Technologies, Teesside University, Borough Road, Middlesbrough TS1 3BA, UK)

  • Devika Vashisht

    (Department of Chemistry and Centre for Advanced Studies in Chemistry, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India)

  • Surinder K. Mehta

    (Department of Chemistry and Centre for Advanced Studies in Chemistry, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India
    Department of Chemistry, University of Ladakh, Kargil 194103, India)

  • Martin J. Taylor

    (School of Engineering, Chemical Engineering, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU6 7RX, UK)

Abstract

The lasting impact of ancestral energy production operations and global manufacturing has not only generated substantial CO 2 emissions, but it has also led to the release of metal-based pollutants into Earth’s water bodies. As we continue to engineer, mine (coal and metals), and now bore into geothermal wells/fracking sites for alternative energy sources, we continue to contaminate drinking water supplies with heavy metals through infiltration and diffusion, limiting progress towards achieving Sustainable Development Goals 3 (Sustainable Development Goal 3: Good health and well-being), 6 (Sustainable Development Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation), 14 (Sustainable Development Goal 14: Life below water), and 15 (Sustainable Development Goal 15: Life on land). This review shows how the research community has designed and developed mesoporous biochars with customizable pore systems, as well as functionalized biochars, to extract various heavy metals from water sources. This article investigates how biochar materials (non-activated, activated, functionalized, or hybrid structures) can be adapted to suit their purpose, highlighting their recyclability/regeneration and performance when remediating metal-based pollution in place of conventional activated carbons. By utilizing the wider circular economy, “waste-derived” carbonaceous materials will play a pivotal role in water purification for both the developed/developing world, where mining and heavy manufacturing generate the most substantial contribution to water pollution. This review encompasses a wide range of global activities that generate increased heavy metal contamination to water supplies, as well as elucidates emerging technologies that can augment environmental remediation activities, improving the quality of life and standard of living for all.

Suggested Citation

  • Priyanka & Isobel E. Wood & Amthal Al-Gailani & Ben W. Kolosz & Kin Wai Cheah & Devika Vashisht & Surinder K. Mehta & Martin J. Taylor, 2024. "Cleaning Up Metal Contamination after Decades of Energy Production and Manufacturing: Reviewing the Value in Use of Biochars for a Sustainable Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-44, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8838-:d:1497177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8838/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/20/8838/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rohdin, P. & Thollander, P., 2006. "Barriers to and driving forces for energy efficiency in the non-energy intensive manufacturing industry in Sweden," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1836-1844.
    2. Al-Rumaihi, Aisha & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Mckay, Gordon & Mackey, Hamish & Al-Ansari, Tareq, 2022. "A review of pyrolysis technologies and feedstock: A blending approach for plastic and biomass towards optimum biochar yield," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Daixi Zhou & Guangyu Xie & Xinjiang Hu & Xiaoxi Cai & Yunlin Zhao & Xi Hu & Qi Jin & Xiaohua Fu & Xiaofei Tan & Chong Liang & Kaiqi Lai & Hui Wang & Chunfang Tang, 2020. "Coupling of kenaf Biochar and Magnetic BiFeO 3 onto Cross-Linked Chitosan for Enhancing Separation Performance and Cr(VI) Ions Removal Efficiency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Todd D. Gerarden & Richard G. Newell & Robert N. Stavins, 2017. "Assessing the Energy-Efficiency Gap," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1486-1525, December.
    2. Apriani Soepardi & Pratikto Pratikto & Purnomo Budi Santoso & Ishardita Pambudi Tama & Patrik Thollander, 2018. "Linking of Barriers to Energy Efficiency Improvement in Indonesia’s Steel Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Wuttipan Kiatruangkrai & Ekachai Leelarasmee, 2016. "Barriers to Energy Saving for Public Middle Schools in Bangkok: From School Management Perspective," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 6(3), pages 513-521.
    4. Olsthoorn, Mark & Schleich, Joachim & Hirzel, Simon, 2017. "Adoption of Energy Efficiency Measures for Non-residential Buildings: Technological and Organizational Heterogeneity in the Trade, Commerce and Services Sector," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 240-254.
    5. Nawaz, Ahmad & Razzak, Shaikh Abdur, 2024. "Co-pyrolysis of biomass and different plastic waste to reduce hazardous waste and subsequent production of energy products: A review on advancement, synergies, and future prospects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    6. Gunarayu, Mathesh Rao & Abdul Patah, Muhamad Fazly & Ashri Wan Daud, Wan Mohd, 2025. "Advancements in methane pyrolysis: A comprehensive review of parameters and molten catalysts in bubble column reactors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    7. Jalo, Noor & Johansson, Ida & Kanchiralla, Fayas Malik & Thollander, Patrik, 2021. "Do energy efficiency networks help reduce barriers to energy efficiency? -A case study of a regional Swedish policy program for industrial SMEs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Fredrik von Malmborg & Peter A. Strachan, 2023. "Advocacy Coalitions and Paths to Policy Change for Promoting Energy Efficiency in European Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, April.
    9. Lawrence, Akvile & Karlsson, Magnus & Nehler, Therese & Thollander, Patrik, 2019. "Effects of monetary investment, payback time and firm characteristics on electricity saving in energy-intensive industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 499-512.
    10. Antonella Biscione & Annunziata de Felice & Teodoro Gallucci, 2022. "Energy Saving in Transition Economies: Environmental Activities in Manufacturing Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Zhu, Junming & Chertow, Marian R., 2017. "Business Strategy Under Institutional Constraints: Evidence From China's Energy Efficiency Regulations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 10-21.
    12. Kounetas, Konstantinos & Mourtos, Ioannis & Tsekouras, Konstantinos, 2012. "Is energy intensity important for the productivity growth of EET adopters?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 930-941.
    13. Gaygysyz Ashyrov & Helen Poltimäe, 2022. "Does Corruption Hinder Firm Energy Efficiency? Evidence From Vietnam," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 137, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    14. Joakim Haraldsson & Maria T. Johansson, 2019. "Barriers to and Drivers for Improved Energy Efficiency in the Swedish Aluminium Industry and Aluminium Casting Foundries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, April.
    15. Anna Dahlqvist & Patrik S derholm, 2019. "Industrial Energy Use, Management Practices and Price Signals: The Case of Swedish Process Industry," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(3), pages 30-45.
    16. Shuai Zhang & Haibo Hu & Xiangdong Jia & Xia Wang & Jianyu Chen & Can Cheng & Xichuan Jia & Zhaoming Wu & Li Zhu, 2022. "How Biochar Derived from Pond Cypress ( Taxodium Ascendens ) Evolved with Pyrolysis Temperature and Time and Their End Efficacy Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Zhu, Tong & Curtis, John & Clancy, Matthew, 2023. "Modelling barriers to low-carbon technologies in energy system analysis: The example of renewable heat in Ireland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(PA).
    18. Trianni, Andrea & Cagno, Enrico & Farné, Stefano, 2016. "Barriers, drivers and decision-making process for industrial energy efficiency: A broad study among manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1537-1551.
    19. Juan Matthews & William Bodel & Gregg Butler, 2024. "Nuclear Cogeneration to Support a Net-Zero, High-Renewable Electricity Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-38, December.
    20. Anna Sannö & Maria T. Johansson & Patrik Thollander & Johan Wollin & Birgitta Sjögren, 2019. "Approaching Sustainable Energy Management Operations in a Multinational Industrial Corporation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:20:p:8838-:d:1497177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.