IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8499-d1488969.html

CSR and Sustainable Environmental Performance: An Exploration of Mediating and Moderating Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Abu Issa Gazi

    (School of Management, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang 332005, China
    Faculty Business and Communications, INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN Putra Nilai, Nilai 71800, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia)

  • Md. Motaher Hossain

    (Institute of Business Administration (IBA), Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka 1342, Bangladesh)

  • Shanta Islam

    (Department of Management Studies, University of Barishal, Barishal 8254, Bangladesh)

  • Abdullah Al Masud

    (Department of Management Studies, University of Barishal, Barishal 8254, Bangladesh)

  • Mohammad Bin Amin

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Böszörményi út 138, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Abdul Rahman bin S Senathirajah

    (Faculty Business and Communications, INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN Putra Nilai, Nilai 71800, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia)

  • Masuk Abdullah

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, Ótemető Street 2-4, 4028 Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

Taking into consideration the moderating role of perceived organizational support within the framework of the natural resource-based view (RBV) theory, the purpose of this study is to investigate the connection between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainable environmental performance. Specifically, this study focuses on the roles that green capability and green transformational leadership play as mediators in this relationship. Through the use of a survey questionnaire, information was collected from 420 employees working for small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Bangladesh. The data were analyzed with the help of AMOS and SPSS. The findings indicate that the level of CSR has a significant impact on the performance of sustainable environmental practices. To a large extent, green capability and green transformational leadership serve as mediators in the relationship between CSR and sustainable environmental performance. Furthermore, perceived organizational support plays a significant role in moderating the relationship between CSR and sustainable environmental performance. The relationship between green transformational leadership and sustainable environmental performance is also significantly moderated by perceived organizational support. This is a significant contributor to the connection. This multidimensional corporate social responsibility model can be used to assess sustainable environmental performance in both industrialized and developing countries, and it can also be extended to other service sectors, according to the theoretical conclusion that can be drawn from the research. This research demonstrates that there is a direct connection between corporate social responsibility and sustainable environmental performance. As a result, practitioners are able to develop strategies that are effective in terms of corporate social responsibility. These findings should be taken into consideration by policymakers and managers who are dedicated to promoting equitable development of the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Abu Issa Gazi & Md. Motaher Hossain & Shanta Islam & Abdullah Al Masud & Mohammad Bin Amin & Abdul Rahman bin S Senathirajah & Masuk Abdullah, 2024. "CSR and Sustainable Environmental Performance: An Exploration of Mediating and Moderating Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8499-:d:1488969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8499/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8499/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Menguc, Bulent & Ozanne, Lucie K., 2005. "Challenges of the "green imperative": a natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation-business performance relationship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 430-438, April.
    2. Tolliver, Clarence & Keeley, Alexander Ryota & Managi, Shunsuke, 2020. "Policy targets behind green bonds for renewable energy: Do climate commitments matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Tony Chieh‐Tse Hou, 2019. "The relationship between corporate social responsibility and sustainable financial performance: firm‐level evidence from Taiwan," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 19-28, January.
    4. Peter G. Rötzel & Alexander Stehle & Burkhard Pedell & Katrin Hummel, 2019. "Integrating environmental management control systems to translate environmental strategy into managerial performance," Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(4), pages 626-653, November.
    5. Wu, Tao & Kung, Chih-Chun, 2020. "Carbon emissions, technology upgradation and financing risk of the green supply chain competition," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Bhat, Aijaz Ahmad & Mir, Ajaz Akber & Allie, Adeel Hussain & Ahmad Lone, Mushtaq & Al-Adwan, Ahmad Samed & Jamali, Dima & Riyaz, Iqra, 2024. "Unlocking corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: Mediating role of green strategy, innovation, and leadership," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(2).
    7. Xiaodong Xu & Saixing Zeng & Hongquan Chen, 2018. "Signaling good by doing good: How does environmental corporate social responsibility affect international expansion?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 946-959, November.
    8. Xiaomei Sun & Ahmad El Askary & Muhammad Saeed Meo & Noor ul Ain Zafar & Babar Hussain, 2022. "Green transformational leadership and environmental performance in small and medium enterprises," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 5273-5291, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qurat-ul-ain Abro & Azhar Ali Laghari & Jianhua Yin & Muhammad Qasim & Azhar Hussain & Azra Soomro & Faiza Hisbani & Anila Ashraf, 2024. "Obligation to Opportunity: Exploring the Symbiosis of Corporate Social Responsibility, Green Innovation, and Organizational Agility in the Quest for Environmental Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhat, Aijaz Ahmad & Mir, Ajaz Akber & Allie, Adeel Hussain & Ahmad Lone, Mushtaq & Al-Adwan, Ahmad Samed & Jamali, Dima & Riyaz, Iqra, 2024. "Unlocking corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: Mediating role of green strategy, innovation, and leadership," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(2).
    2. Kraus, Sascha & Rehman, Shafique Ur & García, F. Javier Sendra, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Tianlun Yu & Jawad Abbas & Riffat Abbas Rizvi & Hina Najam, 2026. "Role of environment-driven CSR, green servant leadership, and green dynamic capabilities in firm green innovation: Evidence from manufacturing industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 5795-5821, March.
    4. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Hussain, Jafar & Chen, Yongxiu, 2022. "The optimal behavior of renewable energy resources and government's energy consumption subsidy design from the perspective of green technology implementation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 670-680.
    5. Cai Li & Pearl Abredu & Agyemang Kwasi Sampene & Fredrick Oteng Agyeman, 2025. "Does Green Human Resource Management Stimulate Employees’ Green Behavior Through a Green Psychological Climate?," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440241, February.
    6. Wei Peng & Baogui Xin & Yekyung Kwon, 2019. "Optimal Strategies of Product Price, Quality, and Corporate Environmental Responsibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-24, November.
    7. Skare, Marinko & Gavurova, Beata & Sinkovic, Dean, 2023. "Regional aspects of financial development and renewable energy: A cross-sectional study in 214 countries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1142-1157.
    8. Mahabubur Rahman & M. Ángeles Rodríguez-Serrano & Mary Lambkin, 2019. "Brand equity and firm performance: the complementary role of corporate social responsibility," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(6), pages 691-704, November.
    9. repec:rfh:bbejor:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:450-458 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Yongliang Yang & Jin Wen & Yi Li, 2020. "The Impact of Environmental Information Disclosure on the Firm Value of Listed Manufacturing Firms: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Soana, Maria Gaia, 2024. "Environmental strategies, environmental performance and board sustainability committees: Are financial and non-financial companies different?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    12. Muhamad Azrin Nazri & Nor Asiah Omar & Aini Aman & Abu Hanifah Ayob & Nur Ainna Ramli, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Performance in Takaful Agencies: The Moderating Role of Objective Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Dibrell, Clay & Craig, Justin B. & Hansen, Eric N., 2011. "How managerial attitudes toward the natural environment affect market orientation and innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 401-407, April.
    14. Marek Vochozka & Veronika Machová & Eliška Sedmíková, 2021. "Fixing a payout ratio by dividend policies: a case of the utility sector," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(2), pages 416-432, December.
    15. Surajit Bag & Muhammad Sabbir Rahman, 2024. "Navigating circular economy: Unleashing the potential of political and supply chain analytics skills among top supply chain executives for environmental orientation, regenerative supply chain practices, and supply chain viability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 504-528, February.
    16. Nian Zhang & Logaiswari Indiran & Zuraidah Sulaiman & Maria Anityasari, 2025. "Factors Influencing CSR in the Practice of “Zero-Waste City†and Its Impact on Eco-Innovation and Environmental Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
    17. Sania Khan & Wadi B. Alonazi & Azam Malik & Noor Raihani Zainol, 2023. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Moderate the Nexus of Organizational Culture and Job Satisfaction?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    18. Homeyra Khatami & Neda Abdolvand & Saeid Homayoun & Saeedeh Rajaei Harandi, 2025. "Sustainable Development and Corporate Profitability: Data Mining Approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 1973-2000, October.
    19. Jelena Spanjol & Leona Tam & Vivian Tam, 2015. "Employer–Employee Congruence in Environmental Values: An Exploration of Effects on Job Satisfaction and Creativity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 117-130, August.
    20. Wang, Jun-Zhuo & Feng, Gen-Fu & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2024. "How does political instability affect renewable energy innovation?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    21. Huawei Tian & Abu Bakkar Siddik & Farid Ahammad Sobhani, 2024. "From commitment to action: unraveling the pathways from top management commitment to environmental sustainability in the Chinese banking sector," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8499-:d:1488969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.