IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8301-d1484580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Carbon Inventory and Systematic Innovation Methods to Analyze the Strategies of Carbon Reduction: An Empirical Study of Green Lean Management in Electroplating an Factory

Author

Listed:
  • Wei-Hung Chen

    (Department of Information Management, Chihlee University of Technology, New Taipei City 22050, Taiwan)

  • Yen-Ming Yang

    (Department of Management Information Systems, National Chengchi University, Taipei City 11605, Taiwan)

  • Hsin-Na Chen

    (Department of Information Management, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan City 32003, Taiwan)

Abstract

This study explored the relationship between lean management, carbon inventory, and carbon reduction, along with the main factors affecting factory carbon inventory and carbon reduction, and proposed a set of carbon emission reduction strategies based on green value stream mapping. An electroplating factory and its production line in Taiwan was selected. Fourteen carbon inventory records, three work circle meetings, and green value flowcharts were utilized to collect and analyze data. Furthermore, this study applied the DMAIC framework and TRIZ to solve the issue of carbon emissions. The key factor affecting factory carbon inventory and carbon reduction was found to be electricity waste, which could be reduced through energy-saving methods. After analyzing the green value stream mapping, effective carbon emission reduction can be implemented in the manufacturing process. The company was found to gradually progress towards carbon reduction after investigating seven major green wastes. This study confirms that lean management can help organizations achieve their carbon emission reduction goals and is valuable in improving the organization’s environmental performance and competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei-Hung Chen & Yen-Ming Yang & Hsin-Na Chen, 2024. "Determinants of Carbon Inventory and Systematic Innovation Methods to Analyze the Strategies of Carbon Reduction: An Empirical Study of Green Lean Management in Electroplating an Factory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8301-:d:1484580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8301/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8301/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abreu, M. Florentina & Alves, Anabela C. & Moreira, Francisco, 2017. "Lean-Green models for eco-efficient and sustainable production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 846-853.
    2. Hicks, C. & Heidrich, O. & McGovern, T. & Donnelly, T., 2004. "A functional model of supply chains and waste," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 165-174, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mena, Carlos & Terry, Leon A. & Williams, Adrian & Ellram, Lisa, 2014. "Causes of waste across multi-tier supply networks: Cases in the UK food sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 144-158.
    2. Amaral Vitória P. & Ferreira Ana C. & Ramos Bruna, 2022. "Internal Logistics Process Improvement using PDCA: A Case Study in the Automotive Sector," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 13(3), pages 100-115, October.
    3. Most. Asikha Aktar & Al-Amrani Khadeem Ali Dhahi & Usman Abdullahi, 2024. "Advancing Sustainable Development through the lens of Energy Efficiency: A Systematic Literature Review," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 168-180, September.
    4. Yang, Shanlin & Feng, Nanping, 2008. "A case study of industrial symbiosis: Nanning Sugar Co., Ltd. in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 813-820.
    5. A. D. Nuwan Gunarathne & H. M. P. Peiris, 2017. "Assessing the impact of eco-innovations through sustainability indicators: the case of the commercial tea plantation industry in Sri Lanka," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 41-58, September.
    6. Romulus Gruia & Gabriel-Iustin Florescu & Liviu Gaceu & Oana Bianca Oprea & Nicolae Ţane, 2021. "Reducing Environmental Risk by Applying a Polyvalent Model of Waste Management in the Restaurant Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Samanlioglu, Funda, 2013. "A multi-objective mathematical model for the industrial hazardous waste location-routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(2), pages 332-340.
    8. Mayanti, Bening & Helo, Petri, 2022. "Closed-loop supply chain potential of agricultural plastic waste: Economic and environmental assessment of bale wrap waste recycling in Finland," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    9. Elaine Shelford Mead & Seán Paul Teeling & Martin McNamara, 2024. "A Realist Review Protocol into the Contexts and Mechanisms That Enable the Inclusion of Environmental Sustainability Outcomes in the Design of Lean Healthcare Improvement Interventions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Noureddine Dahmani & Amine Belhadi & Khalid Benhida & Said Elfezazi & Fatima Ezahra Touriki & Yassine Azougagh, 2022. "Integrating lean design and eco-design to improve product design: From literature review to an operational framework," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(1), pages 189-219, February.
    11. Allevi, Elisabetta & Gnudi, Adriana & Konnov, Igor V. & Oggioni, Giorgia, 2021. "Municipal solid waste management in circular economy: A sequential optimization model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    12. Daryl John Powell & David Romero & Paolo Gaiardelli, 2022. "New and Renewed Manufacturing Paradigms for Sustainable Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-6, January.
    13. Wilson Kosasih & I Nyoman Pujawan & Putu Dana Karningsih, 2023. "Integrated Lean-Green Practices and Supply Chain Sustainability for Manufacturing SMEs: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.
    14. Song, Yazhi & Li, Yin & Liu, Tiansen, 2023. "Carbon asset remolding and potential benefit measurement of machinery products in the light of lean production and low-carbon investment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    15. Favi, Claudio & Marconi, Marco & Mandolini, Marco & Germani, Michele, 2022. "Sustainable life cycle and energy management of discrete manufacturing plants in the industry 4.0 framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    16. Ball, Peter & Lunt, Peter, 2020. "Lean eco-efficient innovation in operations through the maintenance organisation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 405-415.
    17. Cagatay Tasdemir & Rado Gazo, 2018. "A Systematic Literature Review for Better Understanding of Lean Driven Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-54, July.
    18. Wen, Xuanhao & Cao, Huajun & Hon, Bernard & Chen, Erheng & Li, Hongcheng, 2021. "Energy value mapping: A novel lean method to integrate energy efficiency into production management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    19. Artan Veseli & Agron Bajraktari & Anka Trajkovska Petkoska, 2024. "The Implementation of Lean Manufacturing on Zero Waste Technologies in the Food Processing Industry: Insights from Food Processing Companies in Kosovo and North Macedonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Xiaoqing Wang & Qiuming Wu & Salman Majeed & Donghao Sun, 2018. "Fujian’s Industrial Eco-Efficiency: Evaluation Based on SBM and the Empirical Analysis of lnfluencing Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8301-:d:1484580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.