IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i18p8097-d1479296.html

The Central Functions of Cities in Poland in Light of Administrative Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Przybyła

    (Department of Spatial Economy, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, ul. Grunwaldzka 55, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Maria Hełdak

    (Department of Spatial Economy, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, ul. Grunwaldzka 55, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Marian Kachniarz

    (Department of Spatial Economy, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, ul. Grunwaldzka 55, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • David Ramsey

    (Department of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Alina Kulczyk-Dynowska

    (Department of Spatial Economy, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, ul. Grunwaldzka 55, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Szara

    (College of Social Sciences, University of Rzeszow, ul. M. Ćwiklińskiej 2, 35-601 Rzeszow, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to determine and assess the changes in the central functions of major Polish cities in the context of Poland’s 1999 administrative reform. This study covers a period of twenty-two years (1998–2019), which provides a solid perspective for evaluating the functional changes occurring within the current territorial division of the country. The conclusions indicate that the dynamics of changes in central functions in former provincial capitals differed from those in cities that retained this status. At the same time, it was found that the administrative reform sanctioned the scope and scale of earlier socio-economic dependencies in the present regional centers. The research results suggest that administrative reforms in Poland solidified existing socio-economic development paths in cities, but were not the sole catalyst for change. They point to a complex interaction of factors influencing urban evolution. By utilizing indicators that measure the centrality of cities in relation to their demographic potential, this research offers a quantitative assessment of the level of development of central functions, which is crucial for monitoring progress towards sustainable urbanization. By providing this information, this research also contributes to a broader discussion on the advancement and dynamics of sustainable urban development.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Przybyła & Maria Hełdak & Marian Kachniarz & David Ramsey & Alina Kulczyk-Dynowska & Katarzyna Szara, 2024. "The Central Functions of Cities in Poland in Light of Administrative Reform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-29, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8097-:d:1479296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/8097/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/8097/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Parr, 2005. "Perspectives on the city-region," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(5), pages 555-566.
    2. Fujita, Masahisa & Krugman, Paul, 1995. "When is the economy monocentric?: von Thunen and Chamberlin unified," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 505-528, August.
    3. Becker, Sascha O. & Heblich, Stephan & Sturm, Daniel M., 2021. "The impact of public employment: Evidence from Bonn," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. Przybyla, Katarzyna & Kachniarz, Marian & Ramsey, David, 2020. "The investment activity of cities in the context of their administrative status: A case study from Poland," MPRA Paper 100230, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Fujita, Masahisa & Krugman, Paul & Mori, Tomoya, 1999. "On the evolution of hierarchical urban systems1," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 209-251, February.
    6. Katarzyna Przybyła & Marian Kachniarz, 2017. "The Impact of Administrative Reform on the Central Functions of Larger Polish Cities," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(3), pages 843-862, July.
    7. Bastian Heider & Martin T. W. Rosenfeld & Albrecht Kauffmann, 2018. "Does Administrative Status Matter for Urban Growth? Evidence from Present and Former County Capitals in East Germany," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 33-54, March.
    8. Katarzyna Przybyła & Marian Kachniarz & Alina Kulczyk-Dynowska & David Ramsey, 2019. "The impact of changes in administrative status on the tourist functions of cities: a case study from Poland," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 578-603, January.
    9. François Perroux, 1950. "Economic Space: Theory and Applications," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 64(1), pages 89-104.
    10. Dascher, Kristof, 2000. "Are Politics and Geography Related? Evidence from a Cross-Section of Capital Cities," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 105(3-4), pages 373-392, December.
    11. Jessie P. Poon, 1997. "The Cosmopolitanization of Trade Regions: Global Trends and Implications, 1965–1990," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(4), pages 390-404, October.
    12. de Vries Michiel S & Sobis Iwona, 2018. "Trust in the Local Administration: A Comparative Study between Capitals and Non-Capital Cities in Europe," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 209-228, June.
    13. Tabuchi, Takatoshi & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2011. "A new economic geography model of central places," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 240-252, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Ho Yeon, 2012. "Shrinking population and the urban hierarchy," IDE Discussion Papers 360, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    2. José M. Gaspar, 2018. "A prospective review on New Economic Geography," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 61(2), pages 237-272, September.
    3. Tomoya MORI & Daisuke MURAKAMI, 2024. "The Rise and Fall of Cities under Declining Population and Diminishing Distance Frictions: The case of Japan," Discussion papers 24028, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    4. Kogure, Yosuke & Ikeda, Kiyohiro, 2022. "Group-theoretic Study of Economic Agglomerations on a Square Lattice," MPRA Paper 112842, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Ho Yeon KIM & Petra de Jong & Jan Rouwendal & Aleid Brouwer, 2012. "Shrinking population and the urban hierarchy [Housing preferences and attribute importance among Dutch older adults: a conjoint choice experiment]," ERSA conference papers ersa12p350, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Marcus Berliant & Tomoya Mori, 2017. "Beyond urban form: How Masahisa Fujita shapes us," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 13(1), pages 5-28, March.
    7. Mori, Tomoya & Wrona, Jens, 2024. "Centrality bias in inter-city trade," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    8. Takashi Akamatsu & Tomoya Mori & Minoru Osawa & Yuki Takayama, 2017. "Spatial Scale of Agglomeration and Dispersion: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Implications," KIER Working Papers 974, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
    9. Tomoya Mori & Daisuke Murakami, 2025. "Sustainability of cities under declining population and decreasing distance frictions: The case of Japan," KIER Working Papers 1117, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
    10. GUILLAIN, Rachel & HURIOT, Jean-Marie, 1999. "How information shapes cities: theory and facts," LATEC - Document de travail - Economie (1991-2003) 1999-05, LATEC, Laboratoire d'Analyse et des Techniques EConomiques, CNRS UMR 5118, Université de Bourgogne.
    11. Behrens, Kristian, 2007. "On the location and lock-in of cities: Geography vs transportation technology," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 22-45, January.
    12. Fujita, Masahisa & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2009. "New Economic Geography: An appraisal on the occasion of Paul Krugman's 2008 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 109-119, March.
    13. Michael Storper, 2010. "Agglomeration, Trade, And Spatial Development: Bringing Dynamics Back In," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 313-342, February.
    14. Gilles Duranton, 1997. "La nouvelle économie géographique : agglomération et dispersion," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 131(5), pages 1-24.
    15. Mokhele Masilonyane & Geyer Hermanus S., 2021. "A theoretical foundation for investigating the spatial economic attributes of airport-centric developments," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 54(54), pages 21-31, December.
    16. Tomoya Mori & Tony E. Smith, 2011. "Analysis of Industrial Agglomeration Patterns: An Application to Manufacturing Industries in Japan," KIER Working Papers 794, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
    17. Paul Krugman, 1999. "The Role of Geography in Development," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 22(2), pages 142-161, August.
    18. Tomoya MORI & Miki OGAWA, 2025. "Sustainability of Cities under Population Decline," Policy Discussion Papers 25006, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    19. Takashi Akamatsu & Tomoya Mori & Yuki Takayama, 2015. "Agglomerations in a multi-region economy: Poly-centric versus mono-centric patterns," KIER Working Papers 929, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
    20. Maxim Goryunov & Sergey Kokovin, 2016. "‘Vanishing cities’: Can urban costs explain deindustrialization?," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(3), pages 633-651, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8097-:d:1479296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.