IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7761-d1472688.html

Registration System Reform and Enterprise Innovation: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment of the Registration-Based IPO System Reform Pilot in China

Author

Listed:
  • Fu Cheng

    (School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110167, China)

  • Yuyang Kang

    (School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110167, China)

  • Jiayun Huang

    (School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110167, China)

Abstract

In recent years, the registration-based IPO system has been gradually introduced and promoted in China’s capital market, and its implementation effect has attracted considerable attention. This paper focuses on companies that were first listed between 2019 and 2021. We empirically investigate the impact of the registration system reform on enterprise innovation using the staggered difference-in-differences model, with R&D investment as the measure of enterprise innovation. The findings demonstrate that, in comparison to companies listed via the approval system, those listed via the registration system exhibit a higher level of R&D investment in the three years following listing. This suggests that the reform of the registration system effectively stimulates an increase in R&D investment among IPO companies. Furthermore, the reform of the registration system has been found to significantly promote the R&D investment of IPO companies on the STAR Market (i.e., the Science and Technology Innovation Board), while having no significant impact on the R&D investment of IPO companies on the ChiNext Market (i.e., the Growth Enterprise Board). Further analysis indicates that the registration system reform encourages IPO firms to increase R&D investment by reducing agency costs, alleviating financing constraints, and accumulating human capital. This study elucidates the impact of registration system reform on enterprise innovation and its mechanism and provides novel empirical evidence for the evaluation of the effect of registration system reform pilot.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu Cheng & Yuyang Kang & Jiayun Huang, 2024. "Registration System Reform and Enterprise Innovation: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment of the Registration-Based IPO System Reform Pilot in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-26, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7761-:d:1472688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7761/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7761/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myers, Stewart C. & Majluf, Nicholas S., 1984. "Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 187-221, June.
    2. Bronwyn Hall, 2004. "The financing of research and development," Chapters, in: Anthony Bartzokas & Sunil Mani (ed.), Financial Systems, Corporate Investment in Innovation, and Venture Capital, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Zhang, Ping & Wang, Yiru & Gao, Jieying, 2023. "Going public and innovation: Evidence from the ChiNext stock market," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 586-613.
    4. Gao, Huasheng & Hsu, Po-Hsuan & Li, Kai, 2018. "Innovation Strategy of Private Firms," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 1-32, February.
    5. Li, Jiahui & Li, Rui, 2022. "IPO policy and IPO underpricing: Evidence from the registration-based IPO reform in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    6. Amore, Mario Daniele & Schneider, Cédric & Žaldokas, Alminas, 2013. "Credit supply and corporate innovation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(3), pages 835-855.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Yuetong & Zhao, Pu & Fan, Yanmei & Li, Xiaokun, 2025. "The impact of the registration system reform on firms’ cross-country investment: Empirical evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marek Giebel & Kornelius Kraft, 2024. "R&D investments under financing constraints," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(9), pages 1141-1168, October.
    2. Zhao, Qifeng & Li, Zhen & Yu, Yihua, 2021. "Does top management quality promote innovation? Firm-level evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    3. Cowling, Marc & Ughetto, Elisa & Lee, Neil, 2018. "The innovation debt penalty: Cost of debt, loan default, and the effects of a public loan guarantee on high-tech firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 166-176.
    4. Z. Jun Lin & Shengqiang Liu & Fangcheng Sun, 2017. "The Impact of Financing Constraints and Agency Costs on Corporate R&D Investment: Evidence from China," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 17(1), pages 3-42, March.
    5. Chen, Shenglan & Ma, Hui & Teng, Haimeng & Wu, Qiang, 2022. "Banking liberalization and corporate tax planning: Evidence from natural experiments," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Rahman Ashiqur & Rahman M. Twyeafur & Belas Jaroslav, 2017. "Determinants of SME Finance: Evidence from Three Central European Countries," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 17(3), pages 263-285, September.
    7. Pu Liu & Yingying Shao, 2022. "Innovation and new business formation: the role of innovative large firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 691-720, August.
    8. Francesco Aiello & Graziella Bonanno & Stefania P. S. Rossi, 2020. "How firms finance innovation. Further empirics from European SMEs," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(4), pages 689-714, November.
    9. Kaivanto, Kim & Stoneman, Paul, 2007. "Public provision of sales contingent claims backed finance to SMEs: A policy alternative," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 637-651, June.
    10. Edoardo Ferrucci & Roberto Guida & Valentina Meliciani, 2021. "Financial constraints and the growth and survival of innovative start‐ups: An analysis of Italian firms," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 27(2), pages 364-386, March.
    11. Brown, James R. & Petersen, Bruce C., 2011. "Cash holdings and R&D smoothing," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 694-709, June.
    12. Bernini, Michele & Guillou, Sarah & Bellone, Flora, 2015. "Financial leverage and export quality: Evidence from France," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 280-296.
    13. Lee, Sanghoon, 2015. "Slack and innovation: Investigating the relationship in Korea," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1895-1905.
    14. Dirk Czarnitzki & Hanna Hottenrott, 2011. "R&D investment and financing constraints of small and medium-sized firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 65-83, January.
    15. Söhnke M. Bartram, 2017. "Corporate Postretirement Benefit Plans and Real Investment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 355-383, February.
    16. Ortiz, Rodrigo & Fernandez, Viviana, 2022. "Business perception of obstacles to innovate: Evidence from Chile with pseudo-panel data analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    17. Billington, Stephen D. & Colvin, Christopher L. & Coyle, Christopher, 2025. "Financing Innovation: The Role of Patent Examination," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 767, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    18. Xu, Cheng-Gang & Guo, Di & Huang, Haizhou & Jiang, Kun, 2020. "Disruptive Innovation and R&D Ownership Structures of the Firm," CEPR Discussion Papers 14861, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Danlin Shen & Carl R. Chen & Xinyan Yan & Zhihong Yi, 2022. "Do credit market accessibility and legal protection shape corporate innovation?," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 45(3), pages 719-754, September.
    20. Nguyen, Quyen T.K. & Almodóvar, Paloma & Wei, Ziyi, 2022. "Intra-firm and arm’s length export propensity and intensity of MNE foreign subsidiaries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 288-308.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7761-:d:1472688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.