IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7411-d1465685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Only the Friendly Face? The Consequences of Consumer Education for Green Consumerism in Remanufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Sun

    (The Business School, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Qixiang Yuan

    (Columbia University School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA)

Abstract

Empirical studies suggest that investing in consumer education on green consumption not only naturally induces environmental sustainability but also yields various economic benefits for the original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). However, as far as we know, these studies overlook the potential cannibalization of new product sales. By developing a theoretical model that involves consumer education on green consumption when choosing between in-house or outsourcing remanufacturing, we find that if allowing the flexibility of remanufacturing outsourcing, consumer education on green consumption introduces opportunities for opportunistic behaviors that can compromise both profitability and environmental objectives. Specifically, when OEMs engage in remanufacturing, either in-house or through outsourcing, we observe that the incentive to invest in consumer education on green consumption is greater for in-house remanufacturing compared to outsourcing. This heightened incentive for consumer education enables OEMs to maintain higher profits under remanufacturing in-house, which results in a threat to environmental sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Sun & Qixiang Yuan, 2024. "Only the Friendly Face? The Consequences of Consumer Education for Green Consumerism in Remanufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7411-:d:1465685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7411/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7411/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bin Shen & Chen Zhu & Qingying Li & Xiaofeng Wang, 2021. "Green technology adoption in textiles and apparel supply chains with environmental taxes," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(14), pages 4157-4174, July.
    2. Yan, Wei & Xiong, Yu & Xiong, Zhongkai & Guo, Nian, 2015. "Bricks vs. clicks: Which is better for marketing remanufactured products?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 434-444.
    3. Lan Wang & Gangshu (George) Cai & Andy A. Tsay & Asoo J. Vakharia, 2017. "Design of the Reverse Channel for Remanufacturing: Must Profit-Maximization Harm the Environment?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(8), pages 1585-1603, August.
    4. Yanting Huang & Zongjun Wang, 2019. "Pricing and production decisions in a closed-loop supply chain considering strategic consumers and technology licensing," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(9), pages 2847-2866, May.
    5. Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Feng Yang & Jun Li & Jian Song, 2020. "Determinants of consumers’ remanufactured products purchase intentions: Evidence from China," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(8), pages 2368-2383, April.
    6. Wang, Wenbin & Zhang, Yu & Zhang, Kai & Bai, Tuo & Shang, Jennifer, 2015. "Reward–penalty mechanism for closed-loop supply chains under responsibility-sharing and different power structures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 178-190.
    7. Zhou, Yu & Xiong, Yu & Jin, Minyue, 2021. "Less is more: Consumer education in a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    8. Tully, Stephanie M. & Winer, Russell S., 2014. "The Role of the Beneficiary in Willingness to Pay for Socially Responsible Products: A Meta-analysis," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 255-274.
    9. Shuya Yin & Saibal Ray & Haresh Gurnani & Animesh Animesh, 2010. "Durable Products with Multiple Used Goods Markets: Product Upgrade and Retail Pricing Implications," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 540-560, 05-06.
    10. Liobikienė, Genovaitė & Mandravickaitė, Justina & Bernatonienė, Jurga, 2016. "Theory of planned behavior approach to understand the green purchasing behavior in the EU: A cross-cultural study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 38-46.
    11. Kuan Siew Khor & Benjamin T. Hazen, 2017. "Remanufactured products purchase intentions and behaviour: Evidence from Malaysia," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(8), pages 2149-2162, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zixi He & Junqiang Zhang & Wei Yan, 2025. "Sustainable Marketing: Can Retailers’ Profit-Motivated Consumer Education Enhance Green R&D and Production?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-23, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Yu & Xiong, Yu & Jin, Minyue, 2021. "Less is more: Consumer education in a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Juncheng Wu & Lei Zhang & Xuan Shen, 2024. "Outsourcing or Authorizing? Optimal Options for Third-Party Remanufacturing Modes with Green Consumerism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Dexiang Yang & Qin Yang & Lei Zhang, 2023. "Operational Decisions on Remanufacturing under the Product Innovation Race," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Pang, Chen & Li, Gang & Jiang, Li, 2023. "Leveraging strategic consumer behavior in consumer-to-consumer resale: From economic and environmental perspectives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    5. Qixiang Yuan & Lin Sun, 2025. "Promoting Green R&D to Allow Green Products to Outcompete Non-Green Products: Subsidize Consumers or Manufacturers?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Yang, Feng & Wang, Manman & Ang, Sheng, 2021. "Optimal remanufacturing decisions in supply chains considering consumers’ anticipated regret and power structures," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    7. Wenxing Xiao & Juncheng Wu & Junqiang Zhang, 2025. "Good Intention, Bad Result? Government Subsidies for Green Consumerism in the Remanufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Sheng-Qiang Gu & Yong Liu & Hao Yu, 2023. "Power battery recycling strategy with government rewards and punishments," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(1), pages 501-526, March.
    9. Qiao, Haike & Su, Qin, 2021. "Distribution channel and licensing strategy choice considering consumer online reviews in a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    10. Liu, Jing & Xia, Senmao & Wang, Zhaoxing & Nie, Jiajia & Ameen, Nisreen & Yan, Cheng & Lim, Ming K., 2023. "How to balance economic profits and environmental protection: The impacts of cash hedging on remanufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    11. Zhao, Senlin & Wang, Mengxiang & Zhu, Qinghua & Zhou, Qin & Mao, Rongrong, 2024. "Effects of information asymmetry on green advertising for remanufacturing within a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    12. Xi Yang & Maozeng Xu & Wanleng Zhang, 2020. "Can Design for the Environment be Worthwhile? Green Design for Manufacturers Brands When Confronted with Competition from Store Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Seoyoon Lee & Minjung Kwak, 2020. "Consumer Valuation of Remanufactured Products: A Comparative Study of Product Categories and Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-29, September.
    14. Lin Sun & Lingjiang Zhang & Youwei Li, 2018. "Sustainable Decisions on Product Upgrade Confrontations with Remanufacturing Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Benrong Zheng & Chao Yang & Jun Yang & Min Zhang, 2017. "Dual-channel closed loop supply chains: forward channel competition, power structures and coordination," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(12), pages 3510-3527, June.
    16. Yong Zha & Yumin Sun & Yujing Chen & Linlin Zhao, 2024. "Idlefish or not? Online platform’s strategy of secondhand marketplace introduction in the presence of consumer’s uncertain preferences and strategic behavior," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 333(1), pages 331-359, February.
    17. Wang, Qifei & Hong, Xianpei & Gong, Yeming (Yale) & Chen, Wanying (Amanda), 2020. "Collusion or Not: The optimal choice of competing retailers in a closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    18. Zhao, Senlin & Wang, Mengxiang & Zhou, Qin & Xia, Xiqiang, 2025. "Managing manufacturer encroachment and product conflicts in a closed-loop supply chain: The case of information asymmetry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    19. Niu, Baozhuang & Bao, Jinxiao & Cao, Bin, 2022. "Retailer's make-or-buy decision for remanufactured products under in-house yield uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    20. Jie Deng & Xuwei Luo & Mengsi Hu, 2022. "Implications of a Carbon Tax Mechanism in Remanufacturing Outsourcing on Carbon Neutrality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-21, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7411-:d:1465685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.