Author
Listed:
- Zixi He
(School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China)
- Junqiang Zhang
(School of Automation Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China)
- Wei Yan
(School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China)
Abstract
Drawing from practices at Walmart, we model a supply chain where the manufacturer conducts product R&D while the retailer distributes products to two distinct consumer segments: green-conscious consumers who translate environmental principles into purchasing decisions, and non-green-conscious consumers who are deterred by perceived high costs and information deficits. The retailer engages in green education targeted at non-green-conscious consumers, providing clear product explanations to improve their willingness to pay for sustainable products, though this education is motivated by profit maximization rather than altruistic environmental responsibility. Our analysis reveals that while retailer green education can boost product R&D and adoption under certain conditions, this creates a ‘consumer education paradox’—a situation where green education could further enhance product R&D and adoption, but the retailer forgoes it because doing so does not contribute to profit. This occurs because profit-driven retailers limit education to self-beneficial ranges, creating tension between individual profit maximization and overall environmental performance. We then propose two government subsidy solutions—green product quantity subsidies and product R&D subsidies—to resolve this paradox. Both effectively alleviate the tension, but green innovation subsidies, despite requiring greater government investment, consistently outperform in fostering innovation and adoption, offering superior environmental outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Zixi He & Junqiang Zhang & Wei Yan, 2025.
"Sustainable Marketing: Can Retailers’ Profit-Motivated Consumer Education Enhance Green R&D and Production?,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-26, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9008-:d:1768914
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9008-:d:1768914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.