IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9008-d1768914.html

Sustainable Marketing: Can Retailers’ Profit-Motivated Consumer Education Enhance Green R&D and Production?

Author

Listed:
  • Zixi He

    (School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China)

  • Junqiang Zhang

    (School of Automation Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China)

  • Wei Yan

    (School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China)

Abstract

Drawing from practices at Walmart, we model a supply chain where the manufacturer conducts product R&D while the retailer distributes products to two distinct consumer segments: green-conscious consumers who translate environmental principles into purchasing decisions, and non-green-conscious consumers who are deterred by perceived high costs and information deficits. The retailer engages in green education targeted at non-green-conscious consumers, providing clear product explanations to improve their willingness to pay for sustainable products, though this education is motivated by profit maximization rather than altruistic environmental responsibility. Our analysis reveals that while retailer green education can boost product R&D and adoption under certain conditions, this creates a ‘consumer education paradox’—a situation where green education could further enhance product R&D and adoption, but the retailer forgoes it because doing so does not contribute to profit. This occurs because profit-driven retailers limit education to self-beneficial ranges, creating tension between individual profit maximization and overall environmental performance. We then propose two government subsidy solutions—green product quantity subsidies and product R&D subsidies—to resolve this paradox. Both effectively alleviate the tension, but green innovation subsidies, despite requiring greater government investment, consistently outperform in fostering innovation and adoption, offering superior environmental outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Zixi He & Junqiang Zhang & Wei Yan, 2025. "Sustainable Marketing: Can Retailers’ Profit-Motivated Consumer Education Enhance Green R&D and Production?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-23, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9008-:d:1768914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9008/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9008/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin Sun & Qixiang Yuan, 2024. "Only the Friendly Face? The Consequences of Consumer Education for Green Consumerism in Remanufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Zhi Chen & Jussi Keppo, 2025. "R&D Data Sharing in New Product Development," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 1275-1294, July.
    3. Wen, Danping & Xiao, Tiaojun & Dastani, Mehdi, 2021. "Channel choice for an independent remanufacturer considering environmentally responsible consumers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    4. Zhou, Yu & Xiong, Yu & Jin, Minyue, 2021. "Less is more: Consumer education in a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf & David E. M. Sappington, 2007. "The Bright Side of Supplier Encroachment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 651-659, 09-10.
    6. Block, Jörn & Lambrecht, Darius & Willeke, Tom & Cucculelli, Marco & Meloni, Damiano, 2025. "Green patents and green trademarks as indicators of green innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    7. Yang, Jiaquan & Li, Kevin W. & Huang, Jun, 2023. "Manufacturer encroachment with a new product under network externalities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    8. Nire, Keita & Matsubayashi, Nobuo, 2024. "Entry decisions for vertically differentiated markets with brand spillovers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 565-578.
    9. Azevedo, Alcino & Pereira, Paulo J. & Rodrigues, Artur, 2021. "Optimal timing and capacity choice with taxes and subsidies under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinglve Wang & Hongping Yuan, 2023. "Deciphering the Innovation Subsidy Puzzle: Government Choices amid Supply Chain Encroachment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-38, November.
    2. Yang, Qin & Sun, Lin & Wu, Xu & Li, Youwei, 2026. "Implications of retailer-owned digital twins services: The trade-offs between customer experience, misfit returns reduction, and investment costs," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Pi, Zhenyang & Wang, Ke, 2025. "Does lower electric vehicle production cost spur traditional automaker electrification? Spillovers of cost-reduction investments," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Jin, Minyue & Li, Baoyong & Xiong, Yu & Chakraborty, Ratula & Zhou, Yu, 2023. "Implications of coproduction technology on waste management: Who can benefit from the coproduct made of leftover materials?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1248-1259.
    5. Shushu Xie & Yingxue Zhao & Lin Zhao & Xingyuan He, 2024. "Do Online Reviews Always Incentivise Remanufacturers to Improve Quality in a Competitive Environment?," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(67), pages 903-903, August.
    6. Zhong, Ling & Nie, Jiajia & Tan, Yinliang (Ricky), 2025. "Game of brands: Managing brand spillover in a co-opetitive supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    7. Zhichao Zhang & Zhi Liu & Juan Tang & Ting Tang, 2025. "Private Label Introduction and Sales Format Selection with Regard to e-Commerce Platform Supply Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, March.
    8. Matsui, Kenji, 2020. "Optimal bargaining timing of a wholesale price for a manufacturer with a retailer in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 225-236.
    9. Donna, Javier D. & Pereira, Pedro & Trindade, Andre & Yoshida, Renan C., 2020. "Direct-to-Consumer Sales by Manufacturers and Bargaining," MPRA Paper 105773, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Lin Sun & Qixiang Yuan, 2024. "Only the Friendly Face? The Consequences of Consumer Education for Green Consumerism in Remanufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Patricia van Loon & Luk N. Van Wassenhove & Ales Mihelic, 2022. "Designing a circular business strategy: 7 years of evolution at a large washing machine manufacturer," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1030-1041, March.
    12. Aralica, Zoran & Anić, Ivan-Damir & Škrinjarić, Bruno & Harmina, Anita & Vlačić, Ernest, 2025. "Critical factors driving innovations and patenting in academia in S3 area “Energy and Sustainable Environment”," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    13. Nico Schauerte & Ricarda Schauerte & Maren Becker & Thorsten Hennig-Thurau, 2024. "Making new enemies: How suppliers’ digital disintermediation strategy shifts consumers’ use of incumbent offerings," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 672-694, May.
    14. Niu, Baozhuang & Ruan, Yiyuan & Yu, Xinhu, 2024. "Purchasing new for remanufacturing: Sourcing co-opetition, tax-planning and data validation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    15. Cao, Kaiying & Xu, Yuqiu & Hua, Ye & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2023. "Supplier or co-optor: Optimal channel and logistics selection problems on retail platforms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 971-988.
    16. Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Janice E. Carrillo, 2017. "Strategic Analysis of the Agency Model for Digital Goods," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 724-741, April.
    17. Yan, Yingchen & Zhao, Ruiqing & Xing, Tiantian, 2019. "Strategic introduction of the marketplace channel under dual upstream disadvantages in sales efficiency and demand information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 968-982.
    18. Feng Liu & Xingjun Huang & Longxiao Li, 2024. "The impact of green consumers on electric vehicle charging station diffusion based on complex network evolutionary game," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(8), pages 3981-4002, December.
    19. Li, Jin & Hu, Zening & Shi, Victor & Wang, Qian, 2021. "Manufacturer's encroachment strategy with substitutable green products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    20. Hong Zheng & Lin Tian & Guo Li, 2023. "A bane or a boon? Profit‐margin‐guarantee contract in a channel with downstream competition," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(7), pages 2087-2100, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9008-:d:1768914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.