IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p7204-d1461333.html

Towards 2050: Evaluating the Role of Energy Transformation for Sustainable Energy Growth in Serbia

Author

Listed:
  • Nemanja Backović

    (Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Bojan Ilić

    (Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Jelena Andreja Radaković

    (Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Dušan Mitrović

    (Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Nemanja Milenković

    (Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Marko Ćirović

    (Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Zoran Rakićević

    (Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Nataša Petrović

    (Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the outlook of energy generation by means of transformation within the context of sustainable energy development. An analysis is conducted to assess the stability of energy systems so to implement cutting-edge energy production models at the national level, with a focus on a contemporary approach to energy modeling. Considering the energy transition and the existing constraints within the energy industry, the model assesses the feasibility of the practical advancement of renewable energy sources. The bottom-up energy model was used to determine how the components of energy development sustainability can be applied until the year 2050. To perform comparison testing with the reference state scenario, the LEAP energy model was used. This instrument was selected because of its ability to provide flexible and advanced options for selecting suitable parameters for energy transformation prediction. A progressive reduction in environmental pollution can be achieved by the deployment of current methods of energy generation by transformation until the year 2050 in Serbia, as indicated by the findings. The research highlights the significance of utilizing green energy sources for the continuing development of energy and the gradual reduction in environmental pollution through value co-creation.

Suggested Citation

  • Nemanja Backović & Bojan Ilić & Jelena Andreja Radaković & Dušan Mitrović & Nemanja Milenković & Marko Ćirović & Zoran Rakićević & Nataša Petrović, 2024. "Towards 2050: Evaluating the Role of Energy Transformation for Sustainable Energy Growth in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7204-:d:1461333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7204/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7204/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bohringer, Christoph & Rutherford, Thomas F., 2008. "Combining bottom-up and top-down," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 574-596, March.
    2. Zili Yang, 2008. "Strategic Bargaining and Cooperation in Greenhouse Gas Mitigations: An Integrated Assessment Modeling Approach," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262240548, December.
    3. Andrea Herbst & Felipe Andrés Toro & Felix Reitze & Eberhard Jochem, 2012. "Introduction to Energy Systems Modelling," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 148(II), pages 111-135, June.
    4. Jerry L. Holechek & Hatim M. E. Geli & Mohammed N. Sawalhah & Raul Valdez, 2022. "A Global Assessment: Can Renewable Energy Replace Fossil Fuels by 2050?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.
    5. repec:aen:journl:2006se_jaccard-a01 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Kumar, Subhash & Madlener, Reinhard, 2016. "CO2 emission reduction potential assessment using renewable energy in India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 273-282.
    7. Loschel, Andreas, 2002. "Technological change in economic models of environmental policy: a survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2-3), pages 105-126, December.
    8. Malka, Lorenc & Bidaj, Flamur & Kuriqi, Alban & Jaku, Aldona & Roçi, Rexhina & Gebremedhin, Alemayehu, 2023. "Energy system analysis with a focus on future energy demand projections: The case of Norway," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    9. Koopmans, Carl C. & te Velde, Dirk Willem, 2001. "Bridging the energy efficiency gap: using bottom-up information in a top-down energy demand model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 57-75, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Magdalena Kowalska & Krzysztof Czyrka, 2025. "The Problem of Transforming the Energy System Towards Renewable Energy Sources as Perceived by Inhabitants of Rural Areas in South-Eastern Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Abdullah Alghafis & Haneen Bawayan & Sultan Alghamdi & Mohamed Nejlaoui & Abdullah Alrashidi, 2025. "Harnessing Renewable Waste as a Pathway and Opportunities Toward Sustainability in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-30, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Halkos, George, 2014. "The Economics of Climate Change Policy: Critical review and future policy directions," MPRA Paper 56841, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Rausch, Sebastian & Zhang, Da, 2018. "Capturing natural resource heterogeneity in top-down energy-economic equilibrium models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 917-926.
    3. Julien Lefevre, 2018. "Modeling the Socioeconomic Impacts of the Adoption of a Carbon Pricing Instrument – Literature review," Working Papers hal-03128619, HAL.
    4. Silva, Felipe L.C. & Souza, Reinaldo C. & Cyrino Oliveira, Fernando L. & Lourenco, Plutarcho M. & Calili, Rodrigo F., 2018. "A bottom-up methodology for long term electricity consumption forecasting of an industrial sector - Application to pulp and paper sector in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1107-1118.
    5. repec:aen:journl:2006se_jaccard-a05 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Desport, Lucas & Gurgel, Angelo & Morris, Jennifer & Herzog, Howard & Chen, Yen-Heng Henry & Selosse, Sandrine & Paltsev, Sergey, 2024. "Deploying direct air capture at scale: How close to reality?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    7. repec:aen:journl:2005v26-01-a04 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Ekaterina Rhodes & Kira Craig & Aaron Hoyle & Madeleine McPherson, 2021. "How Do Energy-Economy Models Compare? A Survey of Model Developers and Users in Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-39, May.
    9. Kiuila, O. & Rutherford, T.F., 2013. "The cost of reducing CO2 emissions: Integrating abatement technologies into economic modeling," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 62-71.
    10. Fattahi, A. & Sijm, J. & Faaij, A., 2020. "A systemic approach to analyze integrated energy system modeling tools: A review of national models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Andrea Herbst & Felipe Andrés Toro & Felix Reitze & Eberhard Jochem, 2012. "Introduction to Energy Systems Modelling," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 148(II), pages 111-135, June.
    12. Li, Xiang & Lepour, Dorsan & Heymann, Fabian & Maréchal, François, 2023. "Electrification and digitalization effects on sectoral energy demand and consumption: A prospective study towards 2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    13. Rhodes, Ekaterina & Hoyle, Aaron & McPherson, Madeleine & Craig, Kira, 2022. "Understanding climate policy projections: A scoping review of energy-economy models in Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    14. P. Capros & Denise Van Regemorter & Leonidas Paroussos & P. Karkatsoulis & C. Fragkiadakis & S. Tsani & I. Charalampidis & Tamas Revesz, 2013. "GEM-E3 Model Documentation," JRC Research Reports JRC83177, Joint Research Centre.
    15. Saveyn, Bert & Paroussos, Leonidas & Ciscar, Juan-Carlos, 2012. "Economic analysis of a low carbon path to 2050: A case for China, India and Japan," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(S3), pages 451-458.
    16. Yang, Yafei & Cui, Qi & Wang, Hui, 2024. "Assessing the socioeconomic and environmental impacts of China's power sector changes in 2010–2020," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
    17. Olegs Krasnopjorovs & Daniels Jukna & Konstantins Kovalovs, 2022. "On the Use of General Equilibrium Model to Assess the Impact of Climate Policy in Latvia," Post-Print hal-03861139, HAL.
    18. Jaccard, Mark & Murphy, Rose & Rivers, Nic, 2004. "Energy-environment policy modeling of endogenous technological change with personal vehicles: combining top-down and bottom-up methods," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1-2), pages 31-46, November.
    19. da Silva, Felipe L.C. & Cyrino Oliveira, Fernando L. & Souza, Reinaldo C., 2019. "A bottom-up bayesian extension for long term electricity consumption forecasting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 198-210.
    20. Després, Jacques & Hadjsaid, Nouredine & Criqui, Patrick & Noirot, Isabelle, 2015. "Modelling the impacts of variable renewable sources on the power sector: Reconsidering the typology of energy modelling tools," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 486-495.
    21. Harutyunyan, Artur & Badyda, Krzysztof & Wołowicz, Marcin, 2025. "Analyzing of different repowering methods on the example of 300 MW existing steam cycle power plant using gatecycle™ software," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    22. Aziz, Md Tareq & Haque, Akramul & Islam, Md Rabiul & Hosen, Md Biplob & Kader, Zarjes & Aziz, Md Abdul & Saha, Ovi Ranjan, 2025. "Site suitability assessment for solar powered green hydrogen production plants: A GIS based AHP and Fuzzy AHP approach for Bangladesh," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7204-:d:1461333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.