IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4719-d1406991.html

The Effect of Market-Based Environmental Regulations on Green Technology Innovation—The Regulatory Effect Based on Corporate Social Responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Wei

    (School of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Qinlin Zhu

    (School of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Wenlan Liu

    (The Northern Institute of Scientific and Technological Information (NISTI), Beijing 100080, China)

Abstract

This study explores the impact of market-based environmental regulations on green technological innovation and the differential regulatory effects of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on different levels of green technological innovation. By analyzing data from 746 Chinese A-share listed companies from the period of 2008–2021, this paper examines the effect of market-based environmental regulations on corporate green technology innovation. The research findings are as follows: (1) Market-based environmental regulations have a significant promoting effect on green technology innovation in enterprises. (2) CSR amplifies the positive influence of market-based environmental on green technological innovation, but it has a greater impact on strategic innovations, like utility model patents, rather than substantial ones, like invention patents. Corporate may use CSR to superficially meet regulatory pressures and stakeholder expectations, focusing more on short-term compliance than on long-term sustainable innovation. Companies might utilize CSR as a superficial means to appease regulatory demands, concentrating on immediate compliance rather than fostering enduring innovation. (3) Market-based environmental regulations facilitate green technological innovation by alleviating enterprise financing constraints and improving the efficiency of innovation resource allocation. (4) The promotion effect of market-based environmental regulations on green technological innovation is particularly evident in state-owned enterprises, heavily polluted industries, and regions with high regulatory levels. The research contribution is to provide valuable insights into the implementation of market-based environmental regulations and firms’ green technological innovation. Specifically, it elucidates the nuanced regulatory effects of corporate social responsibility, presenting a fresh lens through which to reconsider the intricate mechanism of CSR’s role as a conduit between environmental policy and innovative practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Wei & Qinlin Zhu & Wenlan Liu, 2024. "The Effect of Market-Based Environmental Regulations on Green Technology Innovation—The Regulatory Effect Based on Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4719-:d:1406991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4719/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4719/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hao, Jing & He, Feng, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and green innovation: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    2. Wang, Ailun & Si, Lulu & Hu, Shuo, 2023. "Can the penalty mechanism of mandatory environmental regulations promote green innovation? Evidence from China's enterprise data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Huang, Xiaoqi & Liu, Wei & Zhang, Zhan & Zou, Xinyu & Li, Pujuan, 2023. "Quantity or quality: Environmental legislation and corporate green innovations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PB).
    4. Luhao Liu & Honglin Zhou & Jiaping Xie, 2023. "Dynamic Evolutionary Analysis of the Impact of Outward Foreign Direct Investment on Green Innovation Heterogeneity—From the Perspective of Binary Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Zhang, Wei & Li, Guoxiang & Guo, Fanyong, 2022. "Does carbon emissions trading promote green technology innovation in China?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    6. Dongyang Zhang & Cao Wang & Yu Dong, 2023. "How Does Firm ESG Performance Impact Financial Constraints? An Experimental Exploration of the COVID-19 Pandemic," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(1), pages 219-239, February.
    7. Hasan, Mohammad Maruf & Du, Fang, 2023. "Nexus between green financial development, green technological innovation and environmental regulation in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 218-228.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Feng & Hao, Jing & Lucey, Brian, 2024. "Effects of climate risk on corporate green innovation cycles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    2. Cheng, Yuanyuan & Du, Kerui & Yao, Xin, 2023. "Stringent environmental regulation and inconsistent green innovation behavior: Evidence from air pollution prevention and control action plan in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Zhou, Yuan & Zhang, Qintian & Xu, Guannan & Wang, Yanmeng, 2025. "Regional S&T planning and green generic technologies: A spatial differences-in-difference analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. Wang, Yibo, 2025. "Institutional investors’ field research and corporate green innovation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Yang Huang & Chau-wa Lau, 2024. "Can digital transformation promote the green innovation quality of enterprises? Empirical evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-26, March.
    6. Yan, Zheming & Yu, Ying & Du, Kerui & Zhang, Ning, 2024. "How does environmental regulation promote green technology innovation? Evidence from China's total emission control policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    7. Xu, Yong & Zhao, Xin & Wang, Jian & Xie, Peijun, 2023. "Clarifying the dispute of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from green technological innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    8. Han, Lei & Xiao, Zijun & Yu, Yongze, 2024. "Environmental judicature and enterprises’ green technology innovation: A revisit of the porter hypothesis," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Zhang, Xiaoding & Niu, Yiran & Si, Deng-kui & Xiao, Zumian, 2024. "Regulatory greening: The impact of environmental legislation on corporate green innovation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 359-376.
    10. Xiaoli Hao & Qingyu Sun & Ke Li & Yan Xue & Haitao Wu, 2025. "Can CSR effectively promote corporate green innovation efficiency?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 17525-17555, July.
    11. Li, Xiaosheng & Wang, Ruirui & Shen, Zhiyang & Song, Malin, 2024. "Government environmental signals, government–Enterprise collusion and corporate pollution transfer," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    12. Huiping Wang & Xinge Guo, 2025. "The impact of resource misallocation on green technology innovation: evidence from 288 cities in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Zhang, Hua & Lai, Jie, 2024. "Auditing leading officials: Unintended consequences of government audit reform on corporate green innovation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    14. Zhang, Tingyu & Pu, Zhengning, 2025. "Can energy-consuming rights trading promote green continuous innovation in enterprises? The moderating role of digitization," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    15. Geng, Yuan & Chen, Jinyu & Liu, Ran, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and corporate green innovation bubbles: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed firms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    16. Liu, Duan & Peng, Liyun & Wang, Qiuhong & Wan, Hong & Yu, Nizhou, 2025. "Water resources tax and corporate R&D strategies: Policy effects on innovation investment and collaboration preference," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 2276-2298.
    17. Ying Ying & Shanyue Jin, 2024. "Impact of Environmental Regulation on Corporate Green Technological Innovation: The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance and Environmental Information Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Ali, Shoaib & Naveed, Muhammad & Yousaf, Imran & Khattak, Muhammad Sualeh, 2024. "From cryptos to consciousness: Dynamics of return and volatility spillover between green cryptocurrencies and G7 markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    19. Gu, Tianqi & Xu, Weiping & Liang, Hua & He, Qing & Zheng, Nan, 2024. "School bus transport service strategies’ policy-making mechanism – An evolutionary game approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    20. Jiacai Xiong & Zelin Yang & Lijuan Xiao & Yushu Zhu, 2025. "Environmental judicial reform and corporate greenwashing: evidence from China’s environmental public interest litigation pilot," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4719-:d:1406991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.