IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i10p4308-d1398121.html

Use of Risk Management to Support Business Sustainability in the Automotive Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Štefan Markulik

    (Department of Safety and Quality, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Kosice, Letna 1/9, Sever, 04200 Kosice, Slovakia)

  • Marek Šolc

    (Institute of Materials and Quality Engineering, Faculty of Materials, Metallurgy and Recycling, Technical University of Kosice, Letna 1/9, Sever, 04200 Kosice, Slovakia)

  • Peter Blaško

    (Institute of Materials and Quality Engineering, Faculty of Materials, Metallurgy and Recycling, Technical University of Kosice, Letna 1/9, Sever, 04200 Kosice, Slovakia)

Abstract

Today’s companies operate in a dynamic, constantly evolving, and highly competitive environment. The globalization of markets has significantly changed the economy, where companies operate within increasingly complex supply chains. The ever-increasing expectations of customers and company stakeholders, as well as the need to incorporate a comprehensive approach to the life cycle of manufactured products in corporate strategies, expose companies to a whole range of risks. The research was based on the need of organizations operating in the (automotive) industry to manage the dynamics of the business environment. This was accomplished using an appropriate model that, through its universality, would help to ensure the effective risk management in a holistic approach, protecting their performance and meeting the needs of the relevant stakeholders. The main idea of the research was to create and implement a dynamic model of risk management in the environment of a production organization based on the use of available methods such as SWOT, PESTLE, brainstorming, affinity diagrams, risk matrix, SIPOC diagram, risk, and the results of questionnaire surveys. The research was conducted in two directions: (1) designing the structure of the dynamic risk management model for the strategic management process; and (2) verifying the effectiveness of the proposed model in specific cases and evaluating the technical and economic benefits. To support the dynamics of the model, three basic management tools have been proposed: process review, internal audit, and management review, enriched with features that support the concept of risk-based thinking.

Suggested Citation

  • Štefan Markulik & Marek Šolc & Peter Blaško, 2024. "Use of Risk Management to Support Business Sustainability in the Automotive Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-24, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4308-:d:1398121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4308/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4308/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajiv Nag & Donald C. Hambrick & Ming‐Jer Chen, 2007. "What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(9), pages 935-955, September.
    2. Marius Häntsch & Arnd Huchzermeier, 2013. "Identifying, analyzing, and assessing risk in the strategic planning of a production network: the practical view of a German car manufacturer," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 125-158, July.
    3. Ion CROITORU, 2014. "Operational Risk Management And Monitoring," Internal Auditing and Risk Management, Athenaeum University of Bucharest, vol. 36(1), pages 21-31, December.
    4. Aven, Terje, 2016. "Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 1-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pylyp Hovorov & Roman Trishch & Romualdas Ginevičius & Vladislavas Petraškevičius & Karel Šuhajda, 2025. "Assessment of Risks of Voltage Quality Decline in Load Nodes of Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia Eichholz & Nicole Hoffmann & Anja Schwering, 2024. "The role of risk management orientation and the planning function of budgeting in enhancing organizational resilience and its effect on competitive advantages during times of crises," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 17-58, March.
    2. Frank Germann & Gary L. Lilien & Christine Moorman & Lars Fiedler & Till Groβmaβ, 2020. "Driving Customer Analytics From the Top," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 7(3), pages 43-61, October.
    3. Block, Sidney T. & Friebel, Guido & Heinz, Matthias & Zubanov, Nick, 2022. "Mystery Shopping as a Strategic Management Practice in Multi-Site Firms," IZA Discussion Papers 15599, IZA Network @ LISER.
    4. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:69-75 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Ilkka Sillanpää & Sebastian Sillanpää, 2014. "Supply Chain Strategy: Empirical Case Study in Europe and Asia," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 9(2), pages 95-115.
    6. Marcos Abilio Bosquetti & Gabriela Gonçalves Silveira Fiates & Jess Ponting, 2017. "Strategic Management at Mormaii - the Brazilian Surf Industry Leader," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(Special I), pages 110-129, January.
    7. Mussard, Stéphane & Pi Alperin, María Noel, 2021. "Accounting for risk factors on health outcomes: The case of Luxembourg," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(3), pages 1180-1197.
    8. Zohreh Molamohamadi & Mahmoud Asad Samani & Marjan Karimi, 2024. "Reviewing the historical milestones of risk management," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(12), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Zio, E., 2018. "The future of risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 176-190.
    10. Zeng, Qing & Lu, Xinjie & Xu, Jin & Lin, Yu, 2024. "Macro-Driven Stock Market Volatility Prediction: Insights from a New Hybrid Machine Learning Approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    11. R. Arzu Kalemci & Ipek Kalemci Tuzun, 2019. "Understanding Protestant and Islamic Work Ethic Studies: A Content Analysis of Articles," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(4), pages 999-1008, September.
    12. Mangirdas Morkunas & Gintaras Cernius & Gintare Giriuniene, 2019. "Assessing Business Risks of Natural Gas Trading Companies: Evidence from GET Baltic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Scholz, Roland W. & Czichos, Reiner & Parycek, Peter & Lampoltshammer, Thomas J., 2020. "Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: A first validation of an assessment method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 627-643.
    14. repec:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:1:p:1107-1138 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Li, Weijun & Sun, Qiqi & Zhang, Jiwang & Zhang, Laibin, 2024. "Quantitative risk assessment of industrial hot work using Adaptive Bow Tie and Petri Nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    16. Don Pagach & Monika Wieczorek-Kosmala, 2020. "The Challenges and Opportunities for ERM Post-COVID-19: Agendas for Future Research," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-10, December.
    17. KeumJi Kim & SeongHwan Yoon, 2018. "Assessment of Building Damage Risk by Natural Disasters in South Korea Using Decision Tree Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    18. Noemi Giampaoli & Matteo Renghini, 2026. "Climate change, risks and ECB strategy: what is the effect on European banks’ stock return?," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(1), pages 1-38, February.
    19. Chao-Chien Chen & Hsiu-Ping Yueh & Chaoyun Liang, 2016. "Strategic Management of Agribusiness: Determinants and Trends," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 12(4), pages 69-97.
    20. Andrea S. Patrucco & Davide Luzzini & Stefano Ronchi & Michael Essig & Markus Amann & Andreas H. Glas, 2017. "Designing a public procurement strategy: lessons from local governments," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 269-276, June.
    21. Solano Acosta, Alexandra & Herrero Crespo, Ángel & Collado Agudo, Jesús, 2018. "Effect of market orientation, network capability and entrepreneurial orientation on international performance of small and medium enterprises (SMEs)," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 1128-1140.
    22. Tatiana Yu. Kudryavtseva & Angi E. Skhvediani & Maiia S. Leukhina & Alexandra O. Schneider, 2023. "A Fuzzy Model for Personnel Risk Analysis: Case of Russian-Finnish Export-Import Operations of Small and Medium Enterprises," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 22(3), pages 683-709.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4308-:d:1398121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.