IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i3p2882-2894.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Private Commissions of Public Inquiry: Community Conflict and Multilayer Dissonance in the Mining Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Jill Harris
  • Deanna Kemp
  • John R. Owen

Abstract

This study examines a unique form of public inquiry that we refer to as “privately commissioned public inquiries.” These inquiries focus on events or incidents that indicate broader structural problems of neglect, misjudgment, or injustice. Using qualitative interview methods, we explore such an inquiry in the global mining industry. We ask: what motivated the company to commission an independent public‐facing inquiry? The study finds that threats to organizational identity are vital precursors to commissioning the inquiry. We also find that the unease caused by public scrutiny supports the maintenance of the company's valued identity attributes, rather than disrupting them. Paradoxically, an artifact remains—the public report, a trace that resists the kind of “forgetting” that the company might use to maintain its identity. We conclude that this public “remembering” indirectly supports organizational learning and advances the practice of human rights due diligence.

Suggested Citation

  • Jill Harris & Deanna Kemp & John R. Owen, 2025. "Private Commissions of Public Inquiry: Community Conflict and Multilayer Dissonance in the Mining Industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 2882-2894, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:2882-2894
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.3103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3103
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.3103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:2882-2894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.