IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2023i1p75-d1304387.html

Economic Analysis of Gas Turbine Using to Increase Efficiency of the Organic Rankine Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Dominika Matuszewska

    (Department of Thermal and Fluid Flow Machines, Faculty of Energy and Fuels, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30 Mickiewicza Ave., 30-059 Cracow, Poland)

Abstract

In this research, a modified organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system has been presented and examined. This system incorporates a gas turbine as an additional subsystem to boost the enthalpy of geothermal brine. The primary objective of this study is to perform an economic evaluation of the modified ORC system, wherein a gas turbine is utilized to enhance the quality of geothermal steam. The suggested modified ORC system is particularly well-suited for areas abundant in geothermal resources with low to medium temperatures. It offers a more effective utilization of such resources, resulting in improved efficiency. The study considered 10 different working fluids and 8 types of gas turbines used to heat the geothermal water brine witch, the temperature vary of which varies between 80–130 °C. Various flue gas temperatures behind the heat exchanger, as well as temperatures of the return of the geothermal water to the injection hole, were examined. Based on that, 990 variations of configuration have been analyzed. The research showed that the lowest simple payback time (SPBT) values were achieved for the SGT-800 gas turbine and the working fluid R1336mzz(Z), for example, for an electricity price equal 200 USD/MWh and a natural gas price equal to 0.4 USD/hg, resulting in a SPBT value of 1.45 years. Additionally, for this variant, the dependence of SPBT on the price of electricity and the depth of the geothermal well was calculated; assuming the depth of the geothermal well is 2000 m, SPBT changes depending on the adopted gas prices and so for 150 USD/MWh it is 2.2 years, while at the price of 100 USD/MWh it is 5.5 years. It can be concluded that a decrease in SPBT is observed with an increase in the price of electricity and a decrease in the depth of the geothermal well. The findings of this study can help us to better understand the need to utilize low and medium temperature geothermal heat by using combined cycles (including gas turbines), also from an economic point of view.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominika Matuszewska, 2023. "Economic Analysis of Gas Turbine Using to Increase Efficiency of the Organic Rankine Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:75-:d:1304387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/75/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/75/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tempesti, Duccio & Manfrida, Giampaolo & Fiaschi, Daniele, 2012. "Thermodynamic analysis of two micro CHP systems operating with geothermal and solar energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 609-617.
    2. Khaljani, M. & Khoshbakhti Saray, R. & Bahlouli, K., 2015. "Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic optimization of an integrated gas turbine and organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2136-2145.
    3. Hung, T.C. & Shai, T.Y. & Wang, S.K., 1997. "A review of organic rankine cycles (ORCs) for the recovery of low-grade waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 22(7), pages 661-667.
    4. Shokati, Naser & Ranjbar, Faramarz & Yari, Mortaza, 2015. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of basic, dual-pressure and dual-fluid ORCs and Kalina geothermal power plants: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 527-542.
    5. Jarosław Kulpa & Paweł Kamiński & Kinga Stecuła & Dariusz Prostański & Piotr Matusiak & Daniel Kowol & Michał Kopacz & Piotr Olczak, 2021. "Technical and Economic Aspects of Electric Energy Storage in a Mine Shaft—Budryk Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Nami, Hossein & Ertesvåg, Ivar S. & Agromayor, Roberto & Riboldi, Luca & Nord, Lars O., 2018. "Gas turbine exhaust gas heat recovery by organic Rankine cycles (ORC) for offshore combined heat and power applications - Energy and exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1060-1071.
    7. Świerzewski, Mateusz & Kalina, Jacek & Musiał, Arkadiusz, 2021. "Techno-economic optimization of ORC system structure, size and working fluid within biomass-fired municipal cogeneration plant retrofitting project," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 281-296.
    8. Di Battista, D. & Mauriello, M. & Cipollone, R., 2015. "Waste heat recovery of an ORC-based power unit in a turbocharged diesel engine propelling a light duty vehicle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 109-120.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dominika Matuszewska & Piotr Olczak, 2020. "Evaluation of Using Gas Turbine to Increase Efficiency of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Pezzuolo, Alex & Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna & Mirandola, Alberto, 2016. "The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 605-620.
    3. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    4. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    5. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    6. Nami, Hossein & Anvari-Moghaddam, Amjad, 2020. "Small-scale CCHP systems for waste heat recovery from cement plants: Thermodynamic, sustainability and economic implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    7. Nami, Hossein & Anvari-Moghaddam, Amjad, 2020. "Geothermal driven micro-CCHP for domestic application – Exergy, economic and sustainability analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    8. Feng, Yong-qiang & Zhang, Fei-yang & Xu, Jing-wei & He, Zhi-xia & Zhang, Qiang & Xu, Kang-jing, 2023. "Parametric analysis and multi-objective optimization of biomass-fired organic Rankine cycle system combined heat and power under three operation strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 431-449.
    9. Han, Xiaoqu & Dai, Yanbing & Guo, Xuanhua & Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios & Yan, Junjie, 2024. "A novel dual-stage intercooled and recuperative gas turbine system integrated with transcritical organic Rankine cycle: System modeling, energy and exergy analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    10. Hou, Xiaochen & Zhang, Hongguang & Xu, Yonghong & Yu, Fei & Zhao, Tenglong & Tian, Yaming & Yang, Yuxin & Zhao, Rui, 2018. "External load resistance effect on the free piston expander-linear generator for organic Rankine cycle waste heat recovery system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1252-1261.
    11. Esra Özdemir Küçük & Muhsin Kılıç, 2023. "Exergoeconomic and Exergetic Sustainability Analysis of a Combined Dual-Pressure Organic Rankine Cycle and Vapor Compression Refrigeration Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, April.
    12. Zhang, Tao & Ma, Junhua & Zhou, Yanglin & Wang, Yongzhen & Chen, Qifang & Li, Xiaoping & Liu, Liuchen, 2021. "Thermo-economic analysis and optimization of ICE-ORC systems based on a splitter regulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    13. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2017. "Biogas Engine Waste Heat Recovery Using Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Li, Jian & Peng, Xiayao & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "Design, improvements and applications of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    15. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2018. "Exergetic optimization of double stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 296-313.
    16. Zare, A. Darabadi & Saray, R. Khoshbakhti & Mirmasoumi, S. & Bahlouli, K., 2019. "Optimization strategies for mixing ratio of biogas and natural gas co-firing in a cogeneration of heat and power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 635-644.
    17. Yilmaz, Ceyhun & Koyuncu, Ismail, 2021. "Thermoeconomic modeling and artificial neural network optimization of Afyon geothermal power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1166-1181.
    18. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng & Cao, Liyan & Wang, Yu, 2016. "Comprehensive analysis and parametric optimization of a CCP (combined cooling and power) system driven by geothermal source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 470-487.
    19. Ji, Jie & Yin, Qingyuan & Ji, Chenliang & Shi, Yuanyuan & Shi, Jiaming & Huang, Hui & Sun, Na & Peng, Tian & Zhang, Chu & Zhao, Huanyu, 2025. "Integrating ORC systems for energy recovery in battery production: A holistic performance evaluation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    20. Liu, Qiang & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2014. "Effect of condensation temperature glide on the performance of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixture working fluids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 394-404.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:75-:d:1304387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.