IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7517-d1139059.html

Sustainable Amazon: A Systemic Inquiry with Native Populations

Author

Listed:
  • Raizza Miranda

    (Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA), São Paulo 12228-900, Brazil)

  • Markus Schwaninger

    (Institute of Management, University of St. Gallen (HSG), 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland)

  • Alvimar Lucena

    (Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA), São Paulo 12228-900, Brazil)

  • Ygor Logullo

    (Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA), São Paulo 12228-900, Brazil)

  • Mischel Carmen N. Belderrain

    (Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA), São Paulo 12228-900, Brazil)

  • Tereza C. M. B. Carvalho

    (Department of Computing and Digital System Engineerring, Polytechnic School, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Main Campus, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

  • Renato C. Sato

    (Department of Science and Technology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Jose dos Campos Campus, São Paulo 12231-280, Brazil)

Abstract

The Amazon Rainforest suffers from unsustainable exploitation and encroachment on native peoples’ territories, leading to poverty and environmental destruction. This inquiry aims to understand the impact of deforestation on the economic development of communities and peoples and the relationships between persistent poverty and social pathologies. The research project employed empirical and conceptual methods, collecting data through interviews and constructing a systemic model concerning pathological dynamics within the Amazon region. The study found traps involving innovation, biodiversity, capacity building, access to economic assets, social development, cultural identity, access to knowledge, savannization, and forest appropriation. A systemic approach that reconnects with nature is essential to establish a sustainable economy in the Amazon rainforest. Proposed solutions include an ecological economy, stopping deforestation, encouraging entrepreneurship, valuing tradition, safe environment, building skills and competencies, increasing information and communication effectiveness, and fostering cooperation. This research seeks fundamentally new solutions that reach beyond the existing regime and contributes to establishing a new paradigm for the Amazon Forest.

Suggested Citation

  • Raizza Miranda & Markus Schwaninger & Alvimar Lucena & Ygor Logullo & Mischel Carmen N. Belderrain & Tereza C. M. B. Carvalho & Renato C. Sato, 2023. "Sustainable Amazon: A Systemic Inquiry with Native Populations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-24, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7517-:d:1139059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7517/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7517/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:qeh:ophiwp:ophiwp043 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Ana C. Rorato & Michelle C. A. Picoli & Judith A. Verstegen & Gilberto Camara & Francisco Gilney Silva Bezerra & Maria Isabel S. Escada, 2021. "Environmental Threats over Amazonian Indigenous Lands," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-28, March.
    3. Miyamoto, Motoe, 2020. "Poverty reduction saves forests sustainably: Lessons for deforestation policies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    4. Sabina Alkire & James Foster, 2011. "Understandings and misunderstandings of multidimensional poverty measurement," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 9(2), pages 289-314, June.
    5. Elizabeth Eldridge & Marie-Eve Rancourt & Ann Langley & Dani Héroux, 2022. "Expanding Perspectives on the Poverty Trap for Smallholder Farmers in Tanzania: The Role of Rural Input Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-34, April.
    6. Diehl, Ernst & Sterman, John D., 1995. "Effects of Feedback Complexity on Dynamic Decision Making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 198-215, May.
    7. Markus M. Bugge & Teis Hansen & Antje Klitkou, 2016. "What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-22, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raizza Miranda & Markus Schwaninger & Mischel Carmen N. Belderrain & André Baniwa & Carlos Nobre & Tereza Carvalho & Alejandro Ochoa-Arias & Renato Sato & Ismael Nobre & Paulo Nobre, 2026. "Bioindustrialization by Native People: A systemic Management Approach to Foster Coevolution," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 1-38, June.
    2. Veronica Garcia Donoso & Mayumi C. M. Hirye & Christiane Gerwenat & Christa Reicher, 2024. "Amazon Deforestation and Global Meat Consumption Trends: An Assessment of Land Use Change and Market Data from Rondônia That Shows Why We Should Consider Changing Our Diets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Pasnicu & Mihaela Ghenta & Aniela Matei, 2019. "Transition to Bioeconomy: Perceptions and Behaviors in Central and Eastern Europe," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 1-9, February.
    2. Dorn, Franziska, 2025. "Time and income poverty: Definitions, thresholds and tradeoffs," ifso working paper series 58, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Socioeconomics (ifso).
    3. Alkire, Sabina & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth & Peterman, Amber & Quisumbing, Agnes & Seymour, Greg & Vaz, Ana, 2013. "The Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 71-91.
    4. Hoang Xuan Diem & Tran Van Hoang, 2018. "Multidimensional poverty in Vietnam: Evidence from a rural household survey," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-127, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Daniela Firoiu & George H. Ionescu & Teodor Marian Cojocaru & Mariana Niculescu & Maria Nache Cimpoeru & Oana Alexandra Călin, 2023. "Progress of EU Member States Regarding the Bioeconomy and Biomass Producing and Converting Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Bortolotti, Luca & Marson, Marta & Saccone, Donatella, 2024. "Food and the forest: A spatial analysis on the nexus between foreign direct investment and deforestation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. Carlos F. A. Silva & Swanni T. Alvarado & Alex M. Santos & Maurício O. Andrade & Silas N. Melo, 2022. "Highway Network and Fire Occurrence in Amazonian Indigenous Lands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Yan Xin & Dongchuan Wang & Lihui Zhang & Yingyi Ma & Xing Chen & Haiqing Wang & Hongyi Wang & Kangjian Wang & Hui Long & Hua Chai & Jianshe Gao, 2022. "Cooperative analysis of infrastructure perfection and residents’ living standards in poverty-stricken counties in Qinghai Province," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3687-3703, March.
    9. D. D’Amato, 2021. "Sustainability Narratives as Transformative Solution Pathways: Zooming in on the Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 231-242, June.
    10. repec:qeh:ophiwp:ophiwp076 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Alkire, Sabina & Santos, Maria Emma, 2014. "Measuring Acute Poverty in the Developing World: Robustness and Scope of the Multidimensional Poverty Index," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 251-274.
    12. Terzi, Silvia & Petrarca, Francesca, 2025. "University student's opinion survey: A synthesis and a deeper insight," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    13. Abbas, Khizar & Li, Shixiang & Xu, Deyi & Baz, Khan & Rakhmetova, Aigerim, 2020. "Do socioeconomic factors determine household multidimensional energy poverty? Empirical evidence from South Asia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    14. Khan, Haider, 2024. "Women’s Socially Embedded Capabilities and Development: A Theory-based Empirical Investigation," MPRA Paper 119908, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Andreas Kuckertz, 2020. "Bioeconomy Transformation Strategies Worldwide Require Stronger Focus on Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-8, April.
    16. David Roodman, 2011. "Composite indices," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 9(3), pages 483-484, September.
    17. Raymond Elikplim Kofinti & Samuel Kobina Annim, 2015. "Child deprivation and income poverty in Ghana," WIDER Working Paper Series 150, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Wajiha Haq & Mir Azam & Zaki Babar & Saad Amir & Fareyha Said, 2024. "Investigation of multidimensional poverty in Pakistan at the national, regional, and provincial level," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    19. Álvaro José Altamirano Montoya & Karla Maria Damiano Teixeira, 2017. "Multidimensional Poverty in Nicaragua: Are Female-Headed Households Better Off?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 1037-1063, July.
    20. Prem Chandra Pandey & Manish Pandey, 2023. "Highlighting the role of agriculture and geospatial technology in food security and sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3175-3195, October.
    21. Daniel Adrian Gârdan & Mihai Andronie & Iuliana Petronela Gârdan & Irina Elena Andronie & Mariana Iatagan & Iulian Hurloiu, 2018. "Bioeconomy Development and Using of Intellectual Capital for the Creation of Competitive Advantages by SMEs in the Field of Biotechnology," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 647-647, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7517-:d:1139059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.