IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7328-d1135208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Smart Co-Operative Management Framework Based on an EA Concept for Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Anassaya Chawviang

    (Information Technology Management, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Nakorn Pathom 73170, Thailand)

  • Supaporn Kiattisin

    (Information Technology Management, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Nakorn Pathom 73170, Thailand)

  • Montree Thirasakthana

    (Information Technology Management, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Nakorn Pathom 73170, Thailand)

  • Theeraya Mayakul

    (Information Technology Management, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Nakorn Pathom 73170, Thailand)

Abstract

A smart co-operative management framework aims to apply ICT to provide better services and increase management efficiency. The findings of previous studies suggest that the framework is suitable for any co-operative organization that uses information technology to improve its services, management, and governance. Therefore, this paper has applied a smart co-operative management conceptual model to a smart co-operative management framework. It is a smart co-operative management concept that complies with strategic management for responding to technological disruption. A smart co-operative management framework combines business and technology to align the concept to establish efficiency and governance in co-operative management. This paper presents a smart co-operative management framework based on the EA concept for sustainable development in co-operative management. This framework was developed through a smart co-operative conceptual model, comprehensive literature review, and requirement analysis based on the conceptual framework consisting of five layers: business, application, data and information, infrastructure and technology, and governance. Content validity was used for evaluation. This framework demonstrates that technology could enhance the co-operative sector through the layers of applications, data, and information supported by infrastructure and technology. This study shows the framework for sustainable development co-operatives in the co-operative sector. It also creates value through enterprise architecture (EA) and the smart co-operative management concept.

Suggested Citation

  • Anassaya Chawviang & Supaporn Kiattisin & Montree Thirasakthana & Theeraya Mayakul, 2023. "A Smart Co-Operative Management Framework Based on an EA Concept for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7328-:d:1135208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7328/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7328/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adrian Payne & Pennie Frow & Andreas Eggert, 2017. "The customer value proposition: evolution, development, and application in marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 467-489, July.
    2. Qiao Liang & George Hendrikse & Zuhui Huang & Xuchu Xu, 2015. "Governance Structure of Chinese Farmer Cooperatives: Evidence From Zhejiang Province," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 198-214, April.
    3. Montree Thirasakthana & Supaporn Kiattisin, 2021. "Sustainable Government Enterprise Architecture Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    4. Stephen P Osborne & Zoe Radnor & Kirsty Strokosch, 2016. "Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 639-653, May.
    5. Arnold, Vicky & Benford, Tanya & Canada, Joseph & Sutton, Steve G., 2015. "Leveraging integrated information systems to enhance strategic flexibility and performance: The enabling role of enterprise risk management," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 1-16.
    6. Roberto Garcia Alonso & Sebastian Lippez-De Castro, 2016. "Technology Helps, People Make: A Smart City Governance Framework Grounded in Deliberative Democracy," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: J. Ramon Gil-Garcia & Theresa A. Pardo & Taewoo Nam (ed.), Smarter as the New Urban Agenda, edition 1, pages 333-347, Springer.
    7. Abraham, Rene & Schneider, Johannes & vom Brocke, Jan, 2019. "Data governance: A conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 424-438.
    8. Teresa Nelson & Dylan Nelson & Benjamin Huybrechts & Frédéric Dufays & Noreen O’Shea & Giorgia Trasciani, 2016. "Emergent identity formation and the co-operative: theory building in relation to alternative organizational forms," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3-4), pages 286-309, March.
    9. Marianne Bradford & Dave Henderson & Ryan J. Baxter & Patricia Navarro, 2020. "Using generalized audit software to detect material misstatements, control deficiencies and fraud," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(4), pages 521-547, January.
    10. Huang, Feiqi & Vasarhelyi, Miklos A., 2019. "Applying robotic process automation (RPA) in auditing: A framework," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    11. Felippe Cronemberger & J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, 2019. "Big Data and Analytics as Strategies to Generate Public Value in Smart Cities: Proposing an Integrative Framework," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Manuel Pedro Rodriguez Bolivar (ed.), Setting Foundations for the Creation of Public Value in Smart Cities, chapter 0, pages 247-267, Springer.
    12. Becchetti, Leonardo & Ciciretti, Rocco & Paolantonio, Adriana, 2016. "The cooperative bank difference before and after the global financial crisis," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 224-246.
    13. Huaxiong Jiang & Stan Geertman & Patrick Witte, 2020. "Avoiding the planning support system pitfalls? What smart governance can learn from the planning support system implementation gap," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1343-1360, October.
    14. C. L. Yobe & S. R. D. Ferrer & M. Mudhara, 2020. "Measuring the financial efficiency of agricultural cooperatives in South Africa: an application of the Simar–Wilson methodology," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(3), pages 269-286, July.
    15. Thays A. Oliveira & Miquel Oliver & Helena Ramalhinho, 2020. "Challenges for Connecting Citizens and Smart Cities: ICT, E-Governance and Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, April.
    16. Teresa Nelson & Dylan Nelson & Benjamin Huybrechts & Frédéric Dufays & Noreen O'Shea & Giorgia Trasciani, 2016. "Emergent identity formation and the co-operative : theory building in relation to alternative organizational forms," Post-Print hal-02312324, HAL.
    17. repec:eme:maj000:maj-05-2019-2277 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anassaya Chawviang & Supaporn Kiattisin, 2022. "Sustainable Development: Smart Co-Operative Management Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Martinez, Daniel & Himick, Darlene, 2023. "Accounting in (direct) action: Prefiguring emancipation in accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Andrei-Mirel Florea & Florentin Bercu & Riana Iren Radu & Silvius Stanciu, 2019. "A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) of the Agricultural Cooperatives from South East Region of Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Carmen GUZMAN & Francisco J. SANTOS & María de la O BARROSO, 2020. "Cooperative Essence And Entrepreneurial Quality: A Comparative Contextual Analysis," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(1), pages 95-118, March.
    5. Frédéric Dufays & Noreen O’Shea & Benjamin Huybrechts & Teresa Nelson, 2020. "Resisting Colonization: Worker Cooperatives’ Conceptualization and Behaviour in a Habermasian Perspective," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(6), pages 965-984, December.
    6. Jacob Torfing & Eva Sørensen, 2019. "Interactive Political Leadership in Theory and Practice: How Elected Politicians May Benefit from Co-Creating Public Value Outcomes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Yi Wang & Yafei Yang & Zhaoxiang Qin & Yefei Yang & Jun Li, 2023. "A Literature Review on the Application of Digital Technology in Achieving Green Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Modina, Michele & Pietrovito, Filomena & Gallucci, Carmen & Formisano, Vincenzo, 2023. "Predicting SMEs’ default risk: Evidence from bank-firm relationship data," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 254-268.
    9. Golec Maria Magdalena & Płuciennik Piotr, 2017. "Polish cooperative banks as net lenders in the money market," Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), Sciendo, vol. 13(4), pages 27-36, December.
    10. Severin Oesterle & Arne Buchwald & Nils Urbach, 2022. "Investigating the co-creation of IT consulting service value: empirical findings of a matched pair analysis," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 571-597, June.
    11. Latinovic, Zoran & Chatterjee, Sharmila C., 2022. "Achieving the promise of AI and ML in delivering economic and relational customer value in B2B," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 966-974.
    12. Bavaresco, Rodrigo Simon & Nesi, Luan Carlos & Victória Barbosa, Jorge Luis & Antunes, Rodolfo Stoffel & da Rosa Righi, Rodrigo & da Costa, Cristiano André & Vanzin, Mariangela & Dornelles, Daniel & J, 2023. "Machine learning-based automation of accounting services: An exploratory case study," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    13. Anna Jasińska-Biliczak, 2022. "Smart-City Citizen Engagement: The Answer to Energy Savings in an Economic Crisis?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-15, November.
    14. Liyan Yu & Jerker Nilsson, 2019. "Social Capital and Financial Capital in Chinese Cooperatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Yasheng Chen & Zhuojun Wu & Hui Yan, 2022. "A Full Population Auditing Method Based on Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    16. María Eugenia López-Pérez & María Eugenia Reyes-García & María Eugenia López-Sanz, 2023. "Smart Mobility and Smart Climate: An Illustrative Case in Seville, Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-11, January.
    17. Md Altab Hossin & Jie Du & Lei Mu & Isaac Owusu Asante, 2023. "Big Data-Driven Public Policy Decisions: Transformation Toward Smart Governance," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    18. Cho, Jihoon & Janda, Swinder, 2023. "Reciprocity in upward product line extensions: A longitudinal study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Christian Homburg & Moritz Tischer, 2023. "Customer journey management capability in business-to-business markets: Its bright and dark sides and overall impact on firm performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 1046-1074, September.
    20. Pwint Kay Khine & Jianing Mi & Raza Shahid, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Co-Production in Public Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7328-:d:1135208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.