IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7193-d1133091.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trend for Soil CO 2 Efflux in Grassland and Forest Land in Relation with Meteorological Conditions and Root Parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Mykola Kochiieru

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Kedainiai District, 58344 Akademija, Lithuania)

  • Agnė Veršulienė

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Kedainiai District, 58344 Akademija, Lithuania)

  • Virginijus Feiza

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Kedainiai District, 58344 Akademija, Lithuania)

  • Dalia Feizienė

    (Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Kedainiai District, 58344 Akademija, Lithuania)

Abstract

The key process in understanding carbon dynamics under different ecosystems is quantifying soil CO 2 efflux. However, this process can change annually as it depends on environmental variables. The results of this paper present the effects of root network, soil temperature, and volumetric water content on soil CO 2 efflux, which were investigated on Retisol of two types of land uses in Western Lithuania in 2017–2019: forest and grassland. It was determined that the average soil CO 2 efflux in the grassland was 32% higher than in the forest land. The CO 2 efflux, average across land uses, tended to increase in the following order: 2017 < 2018 < 2019. Dry weather conditions with high temperatures during the vegetation period governed the soil CO 2 efflux increase by 14%. Soil temperature (up to 20 °C) and volumetric water content (up to 23–25%) had a positive effect on the soil CO 2 efflux increase on Retisol . We established that the root’s activity plays one of the main roles in the CO 2 production rate—in both land uses, the soil CO 2 efflux was influenced by the root length density and the root volume.

Suggested Citation

  • Mykola Kochiieru & Agnė Veršulienė & Virginijus Feiza & Dalia Feizienė, 2023. "Trend for Soil CO 2 Efflux in Grassland and Forest Land in Relation with Meteorological Conditions and Root Parameters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7193-:d:1133091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7193/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7193/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard D. Boone & Knute J. Nadelhoffer & Jana D. Canary & Jason P. Kaye, 1998. "Roots exert a strong influence on the temperature sensitivityof soil respiration," Nature, Nature, vol. 396(6711), pages 570-572, December.
    2. Šarauskis, Egidijus & Buragienė, Sidona & Masilionytė, Laura & Romaneckas, Kęstutis & Avižienytė, Dovile & Sakalauskas, Antanas, 2014. "Energy balance, costs and CO2 analysis of tillage technologies in maize cultivation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 227-235.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Šarauskis, Egidijus & Masilionytė, Laura & Juknevičius, Darius & Buragienė, Sidona & Kriaučiūnienė, Zita, 2019. "Energy use efficiency, GHG emissions, and cost-effectiveness of organic and sustainable fertilisation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1151-1160.
    2. Gerhard Moitzi & Reinhard W. Neugschwandtner & Hans-Peter Kaul & Helmut Wagentristl, 2021. "Comparison of energy inputs and energy efficiency for maize in a long-term tillage experiment under Pannonian climate conditions," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(5), pages 299-306.
    3. Šarauskis, Egidijus & Romaneckas, Kęstutis & Jasinskas, Algirdas & Kimbirauskienė, Rasa & Naujokienė, Vilma, 2020. "Improving energy efficiency and environmental mitigation through tillage management in faba bean production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    4. Zhang, XiaoHong & Pan, HengYu & Cao, Jun & Li, JinRong, 2015. "Energy consumption of China’s crop production system and the related emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 111-125.
    5. Xiangwen Wu & Shuying Zang & Dalong Ma & Jianhua Ren & Qiang Chen & Xingfeng Dong, 2019. "Emissions of CO 2 , CH 4 , and N 2 O Fluxes from Forest Soil in Permafrost Region of Daxing’an Mountains, Northeast China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Pawlak, Jan, 2018. "Assessment of economic effects of GHG emission reduction on the example of field crop farms," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 276380, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    7. Manzone, Marco & Calvo, Angela, 2016. "Energy and CO2 analysis of poplar and maize crops for biomass production in north Italy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 675-681.
    8. Van linden, Veerle & Herman, Lieve, 2014. "A fuel consumption model for off-road use of mobile machinery in agriculture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 880-889.
    9. Manzone, Marco & Calvo, Angela, 2017. "Woodchip transportation: Climatic and congestion influence on productivity, energy and CO2 emission of agricultural and industrial convoys," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 250-259.
    10. Xuezhang Li & Benhui Wei & Xianli Xu & Jia Zhou, 2020. "Effect of Deep Vertical Rotary Tillage on Soil Properties and Sugarcane Biomass in Rainfed Dry-Land Regions of Southern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Qi Wang & Longtu Zhu & Mingwei Li & Dongyan Huang & Honglei Jia, 2018. "Conservation Agriculture Using Coulters: Effects of Crop Residue on Working Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Stanisław Bielski & Renata Marks-Bielska & Paweł Wiśniewski, 2022. "Investigation of Energy and Economic Balance and GHG Emissions in the Production of Different Cultivars of Buckwheat ( Fagopyrum esculentum Moench): A Case Study in Northeastern Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Kazemi, Hossein & Kamkar, Behnam & Lakzaei, Somayeh & Badsar, Meysam & Shahbyki, Malihe, 2015. "Energy flow analysis for rice production in different geographical regions of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 390-396.
    14. Šarauskis, Egidijus & Vaitauskienė, Kristina & Romaneckas, Kęstutis & Jasinskas, Algirdas & Butkus, Vidmantas & Kriaučiūnienė, Zita, 2017. "Fuel consumption and CO2 emission analysis in different strip tillage scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 957-968.
    15. Barbara Breza-Boruta & Karol Kotwica & Justyna Bauza-Kaszewska, 2021. "Effect of Tillage System and Organic Matter Management Interactions on Soil Chemical Properties and Biological Activity in a Spring Wheat Short-Time Cultivation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Łukasz Radosz & Damian Chmura & Dariusz Prostański & Gabriela Woźniak, 2023. "The Soil Respiration of Coal Mine Heaps’ Novel Ecosystems in Relation to Biomass and Biotic Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-24, October.
    17. Fan Fan & Bei Li & Weifeng Zhang & John R. Porter & Fusuo Zhang, 2021. "Evaluation of Sustainability of Irrigated Crops in Arid Regions, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Šiaudinis, Gintaras & Jasinskas, Algirdas & Šarauskis, Egidijus & Steponavičius, Dainius & Karčauskienė, Danutė & Liaudanskienė, Inga, 2015. "The assessment of Virginia mallow (Sida hermaphrodita Rusby) and cup plant (Silphium perfoliatum L.) productivity, physico–mechanical properties and energy expenses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 606-612.
    19. Manzone, Marco, 2015. "Energy consumption and CO2 analysis of different types of chippers used in wood biomass plantations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 686-692.
    20. Townsend, Toby J. & Ramsden, Stephen J. & Wilson, Paul, 2016. "Analysing reduced tillage practices within a bio-economic modelling framework," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 91-102.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7193-:d:1133091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.