IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6622-d1122993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Wind Power Project Risk Management Based on Structural Equation and Catastrophe Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Suyan Zhao

    (School of Management, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
    Natural Resource Asset Capital Research Center, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China)

  • Xiaopai Su

    (School of Urban Geology and Engineering, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China)

  • Jiahui Li

    (School of Urban Geology and Engineering, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China)

  • Guibin Suo

    (School of Management, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
    Natural Resource Asset Capital Research Center, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China)

  • Xiaoxuan Meng

    (School of Urban Geology and Engineering, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China)

Abstract

Wind power projects are a crucial step towards achieving the objectives of “carbon neutrality” and “carbon peak” because they can improve the energy crisis and contribute towards environmental pollution reduction. However, the risks of wind power projects cannot be ignored, and the success of the design phase can affect the risks and benefits of wind power projects throughout their life cycle. This paper first proposes causality hypotheses for four types of risk factors in wind power projects: policy, economy, technology, and construction. It constructs a structural equation model for wind power project risk factors and then tests and modifies the model. Then, based on the latent variables of policy, economy, technology, and construction, and the relevant explicit variables, the risk index evaluation system of the wind power project design phase is constructed. The risk assessment catastrophe model of wind power projects is further established, and it is used to evaluate the risk of the K wind power project in the design phase. The risk assessment can identify the overall risk and main risk sources in wind power projects in the design phase and provide countermeasures for effectively controlling risks in wind power projects in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Suyan Zhao & Xiaopai Su & Jiahui Li & Guibin Suo & Xiaoxuan Meng, 2023. "Research on Wind Power Project Risk Management Based on Structural Equation and Catastrophe Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6622-:d:1122993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6622/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6622/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baode Li & Jing Li & Jing Lu, 2019. "Research on the Coupled Risk of Key Nodes in Maritime Transport Based on Improved Catastrophe Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Yu Chen & Guobao Song & Fenglin Yang & Shushen Zhang & Yun Zhang & Zhenyu Liu, 2012. "Risk Assessment and Hierarchical Risk Management of Enterprises in Chemical Industrial Parks Based on Catastrophe Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Anahita A. Jami & Philip R. Walsh, 2016. "Wind Power Deployment: The Role of Public Participation in the Decision-Making Process in Ontario, Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Gatzert, Nadine & Kosub, Thomas, 2016. "Risks and risk management of renewable energy projects: The case of onshore and offshore wind parks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 982-998.
    5. Zhang, Jie & Chowdhury, Souma & Messac, Achille & Castillo, Luciano, 2012. "A Response Surface-Based Cost Model for Wind Farm Design," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 538-550.
    6. Rabbani, Rabab & Zeeshan, Muhammad, 2022. "Impact of policy changes on financial viability of wind power plants in Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 789-806.
    7. Wu, Yunna & Zhang, Ting, 2021. "Risk assessment of offshore wave-wind-solar-compressed air energy storage power plant through fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    8. Jui-Sheng Chou & Pin-Chao Liao & Chung-Da Yeh, 2021. "Risk Analysis and Management of Construction and Operations in Offshore Wind Power Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Han Peng & Songyin Li & Linjian Shangguan & Yisa Fan & Hai Zhang, 2023. "Analysis of Wind Turbine Equipment Failure and Intelligent Operation and Maintenance Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-35, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qinghua Mao & Mengxin Guo & Jian Lv & Jinjin Chen & Pengzhen Xie & Meng Li, 2022. "A Risk Assessment Framework of Hybrid Offshore Wind–Solar PV Power Plants under a Probabilistic Linguistic Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, April.
    2. Tautz-Weinert, Jannis & Yürüşen, Nurseda Y. & Melero, Julio J. & Watson, Simon J., 2019. "Sensitivity study of a wind farm maintenance decision - A performance and revenue analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 93-105.
    3. Huan Guo & Haoyuan Kang & Yujie Xu & Mingzhi Zhao & Yilin Zhu & Hualiang Zhang & Haisheng Chen, 2023. "Review of Coupling Methods of Compressed Air Energy Storage Systems and Renewable Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Haghi, Ehsan & Raahemifar, Kaamran & Fowler, Michael, 2018. "Investigating the effect of renewable energy incentives and hydrogen storage on advantages of stakeholders in a microgrid," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 206-222.
    5. Marcin Rabe & Dalia Streimikiene & Yuriy Bilan, 2019. "The Concept of Risk and Possibilities of Application of Mathematical Methods in Supporting Decision Making for Sustainable Energy Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Rubio-Domingo, G. & Linares, P., 2021. "The future investment costs of offshore wind: An estimation based on auction results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    7. Igliński, Bartłomiej & Iglińska, Anna & Koziński, Grzegorz & Skrzatek, Mateusz & Buczkowski, Roman, 2016. "Wind energy in Poland – History, current state, surveys, Renewable Energy Sources Act, SWOT analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 19-33.
    8. Yan Lu & Xuan Liu & Yan Zhang & Zhiqiao Yang & Yunna Wu, 2023. "Investment Efficiency Assessment Model for Pumped Storage Power Plants Considering Grid Operation Demand under Fuzzy Environment: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Russo, Marianna & Bertsch, Valentin, 2020. "A looming revolution: Implications of self-generation for the risk exposure of retailers," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    10. Feng, Ju & Shen, Wen Zhong, 2017. "Design optimization of offshore wind farms with multiple types of wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1283-1297.
    11. Mosquera-López, Stephania & Uribe, Jorge M., 2022. "Pricing the risk due to weather conditions in small variable renewable energy projects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    12. Xie, Shuyi & Huang, Zimeng & Wu, Gang & Luo, Jinheng & Li, Lifeng & Ma, Weifeng & Wang, Bohong, 2024. "Combining precursor and Cloud Leaky noisy-OR logic gate Bayesian network for dynamic probability analysis of major accidents in the oil depots," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    13. Ilbahar, Esra & Kahraman, Cengiz & Cebi, Selcuk, 2022. "Risk assessment of renewable energy investments: A modified failure mode and effect analysis based on prospect theory and intuitionistic fuzzy AHP," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    14. Sarah Hafner & Olivia James & Aled Jones, 2019. "A Scoping Review of Barriers to Investment in Climate Change Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Hubert Gąsiński & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Dariusz Soboń & Sebastian Zupok, 2023. "Review of Selected Aspects of Wind Energy Market Development in Poland and Lithuania in the Face of Current Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Shahnazi, Rouhollah & Alimohammadlou, Moslem, 2022. "Investigating risks in renewable energy in oil-producing countries through multi-criteria decision-making methods based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets: A case study of Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 1009-1027.
    17. Ioannou, Anastasia & Angus, Andrew & Brennan, Feargal, 2018. "A lifecycle techno-economic model of offshore wind energy for different entry and exit instances," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 406-424.
    18. Colla, Martin & Ioannou, Anastasia & Falcone, Gioia, 2020. "Critical review of competitiveness indicators for energy projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    19. Yi Liang & Yingying Fan & Yongfang Peng & Haigang An, 2022. "Smart Grid Project Benefit Evaluation Based on a Hybrid Intelligent Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Bohan Wang & Zhiwei Sun & Yuanyuan Zhao & Zhiyan Li & Bohai Zhang & Jiken Xu & Peng Qian & Dahai Zhang, 2024. "The Energy Conversion and Coupling Technologies of Hybrid Wind–Wave Power Generation Systems: A Technological Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-24, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6622-:d:1122993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.