IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p5654-d1105589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic Literature Review on Robust Optimization in Solving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Problems during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Diah Chaerani

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang KM 21, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Adibah Shuib

    (Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam 40450, Malaysia)

  • Tomy Perdana

    (Department of Agricultural Social Economic, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang KM 21, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Athaya Zahrani Irmansyah

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung Sumedang KM 21, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

Abstract

Handling uncertainty is important in decision making, especially for SDGs problems. Robust Optimization (RO) is an applied optimization method that can be employed to handle optimization under uncertain data. With SDGs problems, many uncertain data have been considered in decision making. With RO, the data uncertainties are assumed to lay within a compact, convex continuous set. There are three special sets that can be used to represent the data, i.e., box, ellipsoidal, or polyhedral uncertainty sets. These special sets lead the SDGs problems to a computationally tractable optimization model, such that the global optimal solution is attained. However, literature reviews on the application of RO in SDGs decision-making is sparse, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic period. This paper examines the following topics: (1) the purposes of studies of RO and SDGs during the COVID-19 pandemic, (2) the state-of-the-art in RO-SDGs to determine the research objectives, and (3) the SDGs type of problems that have been modeled using RO. A systematic literature review is conducted in this paper, wherein discussion is based on a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) flowchart. To this end, the database reference searching conducted on the Scopus, Science Direct, and SAGE databases, is completed using the help RStudio software. The analysis was carried out on two datasets, assisted by the output visualization using RStudio software with the “bibliometrix” package, and using the ‘biblioshiny()’ command to create a link to the “shiny web interface”. In this paper, the research gap on application of RO to SDGs problems is analyzed in order to identify the research objectives, methods, and specific RO-SDGs problems. As a result, the application of RO to SDGs problems is rare; this finding provides a motivation to conduct a further study of RO and SDGs during the COVID-19 pandemic. An expansion is presented using the key phrase “Operations Research and Optimization Modeling”, or “OROM”. SDGs in Indonesia may be referenced as an example of the capacity building available through RO/OROM.

Suggested Citation

  • Diah Chaerani & Adibah Shuib & Tomy Perdana & Athaya Zahrani Irmansyah, 2023. "Systematic Literature Review on Robust Optimization in Solving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Problems during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5654-:d:1105589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5654/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5654/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marta Abelha & Sandra Fernandes & Diana Mesquita & Filipa Seabra & Ana Teresa Ferreira-Oliveira, 2020. "Graduate Employability and Competence Development in Higher Education—A Systematic Literature Review Using PRISMA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    3. Ahteshamul Haq & Umar Muhammad Modibbo & Aquil Ahmed & Irfan Ali, 2022. "Mathematical modeling of sustainable development goals of India agenda 2030: a Neutrosophic programming approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11991-12018, October.
    4. Nikola Panic & Emanuele Leoncini & Giulio de Belvis & Walter Ricciardi & Stefania Boccia, 2013. "Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-7, December.
    5. Ömer Özgür Tort & Özalp Vayvay & Emine Çobanoğlu, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Sustainable Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-38, January.
    6. M. Hashem Pesaran & Yongcheol Shin & Richard J. Smith, 2001. "Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 289-326.
    7. Vineet Paliwal & Shalini Chandra & Suneel Sharma, 2020. "Blockchain Technology for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review and a Classification Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-39, September.
    8. Gabrel, Virginie & Murat, Cécile & Thiele, Aurélie, 2014. "Recent advances in robust optimization: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 471-483.
    9. Gorissen, Bram L. & Yanıkoğlu, İhsan & den Hertog, Dick, 2015. "A practical guide to robust optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 124-137.
    10. Luis Francisco López-Castro & Elyn L. Solano-Charris, 2021. "Integrating Resilience and Sustainability Criteria in the Supply Chain Network Design. A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, September.
    11. Gokhan Ozkaya & Ceren Erdin, 2020. "Evaluation of Sustainable Forest and Air Quality Management and the Current Situation in Europe through Operation Research Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Irfan Ali & Umar Muhammad Modibbo & Jahangir Chauhan & Maryam Meraj, 2021. "An integrated multi-objective optimization modelling for sustainable development goals of India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 3811-3831, March.
    13. Amjath-Babu, T.S. & Sharma, Bikash & Brouwer, Roy & Rasul, Golam & Wahid, Shahriar M. & Neupane, Nilhari & Bhattarai, Utsav & Sieber, Stefan, 2019. "Integrated modelling of the impacts of hydropower projects on the water-food-energy nexus in a transboundary Himalayan river basin," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 494-503.
    14. Guillaume Lafortune & Grayson Fuller & Guido Schmidt-Traub & Christian Kroll, 2020. "How Is Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals Measured? Comparing Four Approaches for the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    15. Moyer, Jonathan D. & Hedden, Steve, 2020. "Are we on the right path to achieve the sustainable development goals?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    16. Christian Kroll & Anne Warchold & Prajal Pradhan, 2019. "Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Are we successful in turning trade-offs into synergies?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarhadi, Hassan & Naoum-Sawaya, Joe & Verma, Manish, 2020. "A robust optimization approach to locating and stockpiling marine oil-spill response facilities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Chassein, André & Goerigk, Marc, 2018. "Compromise solutions for robust combinatorial optimization with variable-sized uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 544-555.
    3. Francisco García-Lillo & Eduardo Sánchez-García & Bartolomé Marco-Lajara & Pedro Seva-Larrosa, 2023. "Renewable Energies and Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Antonio G. Martín & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero & Josefa Mula, 2020. "Master production schedule using robust optimization approaches in an automobile second-tier supplier," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 143-166, March.
    5. Shunichi Ohmori, 2021. "A Predictive Prescription Using Minimum Volume k -Nearest Neighbor Enclosing Ellipsoid and Robust Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Talan, Amogh & Rao, Amar & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Apostu, Simona-Andreea & Abbas, Shujaat, 2023. "Transition towards clean energy consumption in G7: Can financial sector, ICT and democracy help?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Jiang, Sheng-Long & Peng, Gongzhuang & Bogle, I. David L. & Zheng, Zhong, 2022. "Two-stage robust optimization approach for flexible oxygen distribution under uncertainty in integrated iron and steel plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    8. Viktoryia Buhayenko & Dick den Hertog, 2017. "Adjustable Robust Optimisation approach to optimise discounts for multi-period supply chain coordination under demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(22), pages 6801-6823, November.
    9. Mariia Kostetckaia & Markus Hametner, 2022. "How Sustainable Development Goals interlinkages influence European Union countries’ progress towards the 2030 Agenda," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 916-926, October.
    10. Christoph Buchheim & Jannis Kurtz, 2018. "Robust combinatorial optimization under convex and discrete cost uncertainty," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(3), pages 211-238, September.
    11. Immanuel M. Bomze & Michael Kahr & Markus Leitner, 2021. "Trust Your Data or Not—StQP Remains StQP: Community Detection via Robust Standard Quadratic Optimization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 301-316, February.
    12. Yang, Muer & Wang, Xinfang (Jocelyn) & Xu, Nuo, 2015. "A robust voting machine allocation model to reduce extreme waiting," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PB), pages 230-237.
    13. Carvalho, Andréa Nunes & Oliveira, Fabricio & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe, 2016. "Tactical capacity planning in a real-world ETO industry case: A robust optimization approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 158-171.
    14. Shin, Youngchul & Lee, Sangyoon & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2021. "Robust multiperiod inventory model with a new type of buy one get one promotion: “My Own Refrigerator”," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    15. Bakker, Hannah & Dunke, Fabian & Nickel, Stefan, 2020. "A structuring review on multi-stage optimization under uncertainty: Aligning concepts from theory and practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    16. Annette M. C. Ficker & Frits C. R. Spieksma & Gerhard J. Woeginger, 2018. "Robust balanced optimization," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(3), pages 239-266, September.
    17. Yanıkoğlu, İhsan & Gorissen, Bram L. & den Hertog, Dick, 2019. "A survey of adjustable robust optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 799-813.
    18. Gustavo Souto dos Santos Diz & Silvio Hamacher & Fabricio Oliveira, 2019. "A robust optimization model for the maritime inventory routing problem," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 675-701, September.
    19. Fang, Yi-Ping & Zio, Enrico, 2019. "An adaptive robust framework for the optimization of the resilience of interdependent infrastructures under natural hazards," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 1119-1136.
    20. Curcio, Eduardo & Amorim, Pedro & Zhang, Qi & Almada-Lobo, Bernardo, 2018. "Adaptation and approximate strategies for solving the lot-sizing and scheduling problem under multistage demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 81-96.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5654-:d:1105589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.