IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5513-d1103083.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Conjoint Analysis Approach, Implications, and Mitigation Plans in Analyzing Students’ Preferences for Online Learning Delivery Types during the COVID-19 Pandemic for Engineering Students: A Case Study in the Philippines

Author

Listed:
  • Jenalyn Shigella G. Yandug

    (School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila 1002, Philippines)

  • Erika Mae D. Costales

    (School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila 1002, Philippines)

  • Ardvin Kester S. Ong

    (School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila 1002, Philippines)

Abstract

Traditional face-to-face classes were replaced with online learning when the COVID-19 pandemic happened. Students were unfamiliar with the virtual setup, as well as the technological challenges, which led to dissatisfaction and affected their academic performance. This research study surveyed 230 engineering students and applied conjoint analysis to analyze their preferences in online learning delivery. Using SPSS Statistics software, we revealed the top three attributes for delivery type: interaction, flexibility, and proctored exam. In addition, the most favored combination from the generated stimuli was a form of blended mode delivery. The synchronous meetings and asynchronous activities allowed students to manage their time efficiently. It could be deduced from the findings that students highly preferred the combination considering learner–instructor, live chats, real-time lecture meetings, and automatic availability, with a focus on synchronous online learning modes. Higher education institutions may reflect on the results of this study to reassess the online learning environment they implement among students. Incorporating a student’s learning style to determine the relationship between their preference for online learning delivery type will be helpful for further research through application and study extension. It is suggested that the perceptions of instructors and students enrolled under different learning modalities and their effectiveness should also be addressed. This is a recommendation for future research to consider. Especially near the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, traditional face-to-face learning was being implemented. Thus, future studies may want to consider an analysis of the behavioral intentions of students. On the other hand, analyses such as student behavioral intentions for the future applications of the different modalities and comparisons thereof may be conducted to enhance the implications for, policies of, and strategies of universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenalyn Shigella G. Yandug & Erika Mae D. Costales & Ardvin Kester S. Ong, 2023. "A Conjoint Analysis Approach, Implications, and Mitigation Plans in Analyzing Students’ Preferences for Online Learning Delivery Types during the COVID-19 Pandemic for Engineering Students: A Case Stu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5513-:d:1103083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5513/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5513/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih & Ahmed M. Hasanein & Ahmed E. Abu Elnasr, 2020. "Responses to COVID-19 in Higher Education: Social Media Usage for Sustaining Formal Academic Communication in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Józef Ober & Anna Kochmańska, 2022. "Remote Learning in Higher Education: Evidence from Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-35, November.
    3. Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Michael Nayat Young & John Francis T. Diaz & Thanatorn Chuenyindee & Poonyawat Kusonwattana & Nattakit Yuduang & Reny Nadlifatin & Anak Agung Ngurah Perwira , 2021. "Students’ Preference Analysis on Online Learning Attributes in Industrial Engineering Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Conjoint Analysis Approach for Sustainable Industrial Engineers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Kerr Lorenzo Picazo & Kim Aaron Salvador & Bobby Ardiansyah Miraja & Yoshiki B. Kurata & Thanatorn Chuenyindee & Reny Nadlifatin & Anak Agung Ngurah Perwira , 2021. "Gym-Goers Preference Analysis of Fitness Centers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Conjoint Analysis Approach for Business Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Mohamed Zine & Fouzi Harrou & Mohammed Terbeche & Mohammed Bellahcene & Abdelkader Dairi & Ying Sun, 2023. "E-Learning Readiness Assessment Using Machine Learning Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Rahiem, Maila D.H., 2021. "Remaining motivated despite the limitations: University students’ learning propensity during the COVID-19 pandemic," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Zhou Yan & Meng Na & Syed Shah Alam & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Ye Xiao Lu, 2022. "Teacher Competencies and School Improvement Specialist Coaching (SISC+) Programme in Malaysia as a Model for Improvement of Quality Education in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Hüseyin Uzunboylu & Gönül Akçamete & Nilgün Sarp & Mukaddes Demirok, 2022. "Primary Schoolteachers’ Opinions about Gifted Education Programmes in Distance Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Shafi AlDousari, 2023. "Capacities and Obstacles of Kuwait Medical Educational Sector in Transitioning Education System to Online Form: A Paradigm Shift," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(12), pages 1-88, February.
    7. Lorena Espina-Romero & Doile Ríos Parra & José Gregorio Noroño-Sánchez & Gloria Rojas-Cangahuala & Luz Emerita Cervera Cajo & Pedro Alfonso Velásquez-Tapullima, 2024. "Navigating Digital Transformation: Current Trends in Digital Competencies for Open Innovation in Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Mohamed A. Shabeeb & Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih & Ibrahim A. Elshaer, 2022. "Examining Learning Experience and Satisfaction of Accounting Students in Higher Education before and amid COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Fan Zhang & Jianbo Pang & Yanlong Guo & Yelin Zhu & Han Zhang, 2023. "A Study of Factors Influencing the Use of the DingTalk Online Lecture Platform in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Uthman Alturki & Ahmed Aldraiweesh, 2021. "Application of Learning Management System (LMS) during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Sustainable Acceptance Model of the Expansion Technology Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, October.
    11. S. Ong, Ardvin Kester & Prasetyo, Yogi Tri & Chuenyindee, Thanatorn & Young, Michael Nayat & Doma, Bonifacio T. & Caballes, Dennis G. & Centeno, Raffy S. & Morfe, Anthony S. & Bautista, Christine S., 2022. "Preference analysis on the online learning attributes among senior high school students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A conjoint analysis approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    12. Mansour A. Alyahya & Ibrahim A. Elshaer & Fathi Abunasser & Osama H. Mahmoud Hassan & Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih, 2022. "E-Learning Experience in Higher Education amid COVID-19: Does Gender Really Matter in A Gender-Segregated Culture?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-12, March.
    13. Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih & Amany E. Salem & Ahmed M. Hasanein & Ahmed E. Abu Elnasr, 2021. "Responses to COVID-19 in Higher Education: Students’ Learning Experience Using Microsoft Teams versus Social Network Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-12, September.
    14. Mostafa Aboulnour Salem & Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih, 2022. "ADIDAS: An Examined Approach for Enhancing Cognitive Load and Attitudes towards Synchronous Digital Learning Amid and Post COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Masouda A. Gurban & Abeer S. Almogren, 2022. "Students’ Actual Use of E-Learning in Higher Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    16. Nissim Avissar, 2023. "Emergency Remote Teaching and Social–Emotional Learning: Examining Gender Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Claudiu Coman & Laurențiu Gabriel Țîru & Luiza Meseșan-Schmitz & Carmen Stanciu & Maria Cristina Bularca, 2020. "Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Renzhong Peng & Qiqin Hu & Bochra Kouider, 2023. "Teachers’ Acceptance of Online Teaching and Emotional Labor in the EFL Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Aleksandra Kuzior & Dariusz Krawczyk & Kateryna Onopriienko & Yuriy Petrushenko & Iryna Onopriienko & Volodymyr Onopriienko, 2023. "Lifelong Learning as a Factor in the Country’s Competitiveness and Innovative Potential within the Framework of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-12, June.
    20. Sohee Kim & Sunghee Cho & Joo Yeun Kim & Dae-Jin Kim, 2023. "Statistical Assessment on Student Engagement in Asynchronous Online Learning Using the k -Means Clustering Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5513-:d:1103083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.