IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4645-d1088614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How the Distribution of Photon Delivery Impacts Crops in Indoor Plant Environments: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Rachael Warner

    (Department of Bioresource Engineering, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada)

  • Bo-Sen Wu

    (Department of Bioresource Engineering, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada)

  • Sarah MacPherson

    (Department of Bioresource Engineering, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada)

  • Mark Lefsrud

    (Department of Bioresource Engineering, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada)

Abstract

Indoor plant production allows for increased controllability over plant growth, particularly with the employment of specific lighting regimes. This article reviews research investigating the influence of various light regimes that provide crops with the same light spectrum and daily light integral (DLI), yet with different lighting schedules and intensities. The structure of these light regimes includes changing photoperiod duration and light intensity, cyclic lighting schedules (increased number of light/dark cycles over 24 h, same total illuminated time and intensity), and intermittent and fluctuating lighting (with intervals ranging from 60 s to 60 min). The most common crops investigated were leafy greens, although some fruiting, ornamental, and model crop Arabidopsis are included. Under constant DLI, extending photoperiod and reducing light intensity generally increased the total amount of biomass accumulation and increased light interception. Increases in the number of shortened light/dark cycles contributed to decreased yield, leaf area, and photosynthetic rate, compared to the more standard single light/dark cycle. Intermittent and fluctuating lighting regimes generally reduced biomass accumulation and light interception. These results indicate that the total amount of light delivered to crops is important, but how that light is delivered can influence crop growth. This review will be useful for growers and researchers when designing lighting systems and regimes to produce horticultural crops in indoor plant environment systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachael Warner & Bo-Sen Wu & Sarah MacPherson & Mark Lefsrud, 2023. "How the Distribution of Photon Delivery Impacts Crops in Indoor Plant Environments: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4645-:d:1088614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4645/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4645/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dafni Despoina Avgoustaki & George Xydis, 2020. "Plant factories in the water-food-energy Nexus era: a systematic bibliographical review," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(2), pages 253-268, April.
    2. Ivan Paucek & Elisa Appolloni & Giuseppina Pennisi & Stefania Quaini & Giorgio Gianquinto & Francesco Orsini, 2020. "LED Lighting Systems for Horticulture: Business Growth and Global Distribution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Vu Phong Lam & Jaeyun Choi & Jongseok Park, 2021. "Enhancing Growth and Glucosinolate Accumulation in Watercress ( Nasturtium officinale L.) by Regulating Light Intensity and Photoperiod in Plant Factories," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-9, July.
    4. James Eaves & Stephen Eaves, 2018. "Comparing the Profitability of a Greenhouse to a Vertical Farm in Quebec," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 66(1), pages 43-54, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dafni Despoina Avgoustaki & George Xydis, 2020. "Indoor Vertical Farming in the Urban Nexus Context: Business Growth and Resource Savings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Michael Martin & Elvira Molin, 2019. "Environmental Assessment of an Urban Vertical Hydroponic Farming System in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Shazia Kousar & Farhan Ahmed & Amber Pervaiz & Štefan Bojnec, 2021. "Food Insecurity, Population Growth, Urbanization and Water Availability: The Role of Government Stability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Michael Martin & Sofia Poulikidou & Elvira Molin, 2019. "Exploring the Environmental Performance of Urban Symbiosis for Vertical Hydroponic Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-18, November.
    5. Caixia Ivy Gan & Ruth Soukoutou & Denise Maria Conroy, 2022. "Sustainability Framing of Controlled Environment Agriculture and Consumer Perceptions: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Jing-Li Fan & Qian Wang & Xian Zhang, 2021. "A bibliometric analysis of the water-energy-food nexus based on the SCIE and SSCI database of the Web of Science," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 1-26, February.
    7. Rao Kuang & Nangui Fan & Weifeng Zhang & Song Gan & Xiaomin Zhou & Heyi Huang & Yijun Shen, 2022. "Feasibility Analysis of Creating Light Environment for Growing Containers with Marine Renewable Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Francis J. Baumont de Oliveira & Scott Ferson & Ronald A. D. Dyer & Jens M. H. Thomas & Paul D. Myers & Nicholas G. Gray, 2022. "How High Is High Enough? Assessing Financial Risk for Vertical Farms Using Imprecise Probability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-29, May.
    9. Hyeog-In Kwon & Bo-Hyun Baek & Yong-Su Jeon, 2021. "A Study of the Business Model Development of Human Centric Lighting: Based on Eco-Science Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Esther Sanyé-Mengual & Francesco Orsini & Giorgio Gianquinto, 2018. "Revisiting the Sustainability Concept of Urban Food Production from a Stakeholders’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Michael Graham Parkes & Rebekah O’Rourke & Tiago Domingos & Ricardo F. M. Teixeira, 2023. "An Experimental Portuguese Social-Enterprise Project in Urban Agriculture: A Case Study on the Influence of the Interaction of Stakeholder Roles on Sustainable Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    12. George Xydis, 2022. "The Importance of Wind Resource Assessment in Plant Factories’ Siting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-3, July.
    13. Zhang, Zitian & Rod, Michael & Hosseinian, Farah, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review on Sustainable Industrial Vertical Farming Using Film Farming Technology," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1).
    14. Dongdong Jia & Wenzhong Guo & Lichun Wang & Wengang Zheng & Guohua Gao, 2024. "Design and Experiment of Automatic Transport System for Planting Plate in Plant Factory," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, March.
    15. Sandhya Adhikari & Gresha Suwal & Binita Suwal & Nisha Bashyal & Roshma Pandey, 2021. "Plant Breeding Approaches For Combating Impact Of Climate Change In Agriculture Production: A Review," Tropical Agroecosystems (TAEC), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 1-5, January.
    16. Filippos Bantis & Athanasios Koukounaras, 2023. "Impact of Light on Horticultural Crops," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-4, April.
    17. Ernesto Olvera-Gonzalez & Nivia Escalante-Garcia & Deland Myers & Peter Ampim & Eric Obeng & Daniel Alaniz-Lumbreras & Victor Castaño, 2021. "Pulsed LED-Lighting as an Alternative Energy Savings Technique for Vertical Farms and Plant Factories," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4645-:d:1088614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.