IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4303-d1083164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Meta-Synthesis Review of Occupant Comfort Assessment in Buildings (2002–2022)

Author

Listed:
  • Amir Faraji

    (Construction Project Management Department, Faculty of Architecture, KHATAM University, Tehran 1991633357, Iran
    School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Maria Rashidi

    (School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Fatemeh Rezaei

    (Faculty of Architecture, KHATAM University, Tehran 1991633357, Iran)

  • Payam Rahnamayiezekavat

    (School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

Abstract

Occupant comfort in buildings is one of the most crucial considerations in designing a building. Accordingly, there is a growing interest in this area. Aspects of comfort include thermal comfort, visual comfort, acoustic comfort, and indoor air quality (IAQ) satisfaction. The objective of this state-of-the-art review was to provide a comprehensive, explicit, and up-to-date literature review on occupant comfort in buildings, since this issue has a great impact on the lifestyle, health, and productivity of occupants. A meta-synthesis method was also used for an analytical-interpretive review of previous studies. In this research, scientific research studies related to the subject of indoor occupant comfort in the period 2002–2022 were reviewed. Previous reviews have often covered the fundamental concepts and principles related to indoor occupant comfort. Although innumerable studies have focused on thermal comfort, other aspects of occupant comfort have not been considered. The review is analyzed and discussed in reference to type of study, case study geographical locations and climate zones, case study building types, decision-making models, assessment criteria, data-collection tools, and data analysis strategies. Finally, future research recommendations are presented. Through the review, we find that the comfort models used in research are mostly based on comfort perception votes collected from experimental studies, which may not reflect the preferences of users well. In addition, only the influence of environmental factors on the models has been investigated, and other personal factors have been ignored. This study presents a useful guide for researchers to determine their outlines for future research in this field.

Suggested Citation

  • Amir Faraji & Maria Rashidi & Fatemeh Rezaei & Payam Rahnamayiezekavat, 2023. "A Meta-Synthesis Review of Occupant Comfort Assessment in Buildings (2002–2022)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-36, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4303-:d:1083164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4303/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4303/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sukjoon Oh & Suwon Song, 2021. "Detailed Analysis of Thermal Comfort and Indoor Air Quality Using Real-Time Multiple Environmental Monitoring Data for a Childcare Center," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Ebrahimi-Moghadam, Amir & Ildarabadi, Paria & Aliakbari, Karim & Fadaee, Faramarz, 2020. "Sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization of energy consumption and thermal comfort by using interior light shelves in residential buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 736-755.
    3. Isabel Montiel & Asunción M. Mayoral & Jose Navarro Pedreño & Silvia Maiques, 2019. "Acoustic Comfort in Learning Spaces: Moving Towards Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Ma, Nan & Aviv, Dorit & Guo, Hongshan & Braham, William W., 2021. "Measuring the right factors: A review of variables and models for thermal comfort and indoor air quality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    5. Djongyang, Noël & Tchinda, René & Njomo, Donatien, 2010. "Thermal comfort: A review paper," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2626-2640, December.
    6. Yang, Shiyu & Wan, Man Pun & Chen, Wanyu & Ng, Bing Feng & Dubey, Swapnil, 2020. "Model predictive control with adaptive machine-learning-based model for building energy efficiency and comfort optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    7. Nundy, Srijita & Ghosh, Aritra, 2020. "Thermal and visual comfort analysis of adaptive vacuum integrated switchable suspended particle device window for temperate climate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1361-1372.
    8. Wang, Ran & Lu, Shilei & Feng, Wei, 2020. "A three-stage optimization methodology for envelope design of passive house considering energy demand, thermal comfort and cost," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    9. Carlucci, Salvatore & Causone, Francesco & De Rosa, Francesco & Pagliano, Lorenzo, 2015. "A review of indices for assessing visual comfort with a view to their use in optimization processes to support building integrated design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1016-1033.
    10. Ilaria Ballarini & Giovanna De Luca & Argun Paragamyan & Anna Pellegrino & Vincenzo Corrado, 2019. "Transformation of an Office Building into a Nearly Zero Energy Building (nZEB): Implications for Thermal and Visual Comfort and Energy Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Guofeng Ma & Xuhui Pan, 2021. "Research on a Visual Comfort Model Based on Individual Preference in China through Machine Learning Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-23, July.
    12. Steemers, Koen, 1994. "Daylighting design: Enhancing energy efficiency and visual quality," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 5(5), pages 950-958.
    13. Leonidas Bourikas & Stephanie Gauthier & Nicholas Khor Song En & Peiyao Xiong, 2021. "Effect of Thermal, Acoustic and Air Quality Perception Interactions on the Comfort and Satisfaction of People in Office Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Chen, Xiao & Wang, Qian & Srebric, Jelena, 2016. "Occupant feedback based model predictive control for thermal comfort and energy optimization: A chamber experimental evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 341-351.
    15. Zomorodian, Zahra S. & Tahsildoost, Mohammad, 2019. "Assessing the effectiveness of dynamic metrics in predicting daylight availability and visual comfort in classrooms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 669-680.
    16. Dietz, Annelore & Vera, Sergio & Bustamante, Waldo & Flamant, Gilles, 2020. "Multi-objective optimization to balance thermal comfort and energy use in a mining camp located in the Andes Mountains at high altitude," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    17. Yonggang Zhang & Yongwei Zhong & Yingda Gong & Lirong Zheng, 2018. "The Optimization of Visual Comfort and Energy Consumption Induced by Natural Light Based on PSO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Zhang, Sheng & Cheng, Yong & Fang, Zhaosong & Huan, Chao & Lin, Zhang, 2017. "Optimization of room air temperature in stratum-ventilated rooms for both thermal comfort and energy saving," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 420-431.
    19. Kim, Jimin & Hong, Taehoon & Jeong, Jaemin & Koo, Choongwan & Jeong, Kwangbok, 2016. "An optimization model for selecting the optimal green systems by considering the thermal comfort and energy consumption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 682-695.
    20. Ochoa, Carlos E. & Aries, Myriam B.C. & van Loenen, Evert J. & Hensen, Jan L.M., 2012. "Considerations on design optimization criteria for windows providing low energy consumption and high visual comfort," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 238-245.
    21. Michael, A. & Gregoriou, S. & Kalogirou, S.A., 2018. "Environmental assessment of an integrated adaptive system for the improvement of indoor visual comfort of existing buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 620-633.
    22. Korkas, Christos D. & Baldi, Simone & Michailidis, Iakovos & Kosmatopoulos, Elias B., 2016. "Occupancy-based demand response and thermal comfort optimization in microgrids with renewable energy sources and energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 93-104.
    23. Mukhtar, A. & Ng, K.C. & Yusoff, M.Z., 2018. "Design optimization for ventilation shafts of naturally-ventilated underground shelters for improvement of ventilation rate and thermal comfort," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 183-198.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vassiliades, Constantinos & Michael, Aimilios & Savvides, Andreas & Kalogirou, Soteris, 2018. "Improvement of passive behaviour of existing buildings through the integration of active solar energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1178-1192.
    2. Pilechiha, Peiman & Mahdavinejad, Mohammadjavad & Pour Rahimian, Farzad & Carnemolla, Phillippa & Seyedzadeh, Saleh, 2020. "Multi-objective optimisation framework for designing office windows: quality of view, daylight and energy efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    3. Zhang, Sheng & Cheng, Yong & Fang, Zhaosong & Huan, Chao & Lin, Zhang, 2017. "Optimization of room air temperature in stratum-ventilated rooms for both thermal comfort and energy saving," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 420-431.
    4. Wang, Wei & Hong, Tianzhen & Li, Nan & Wang, Ryan Qi & Chen, Jiayu, 2019. "Linking energy-cyber-physical systems with occupancy prediction and interpretation through WiFi probe-based ensemble classification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 55-69.
    5. Roberta Moschetti & Shabnam Homaei & Ellika Taveres-Cachat & Steinar Grynning, 2022. "Assessing Responsive Building Envelope Designs through Robustness-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Zero-Emission Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    6. Lee, Minjung & Ham, Jeonggyun & Lee, Jeong-Won & Cho, Honghyun, 2023. "Analysis of thermal comfort, energy consumption, and CO2 reduction of indoor space according to the type of local heating under winter rest conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    7. Azar, Elie & Nikolopoulou, Christina & Papadopoulos, Sokratis, 2016. "Integrating and optimizing metrics of sustainable building performance using human-focused agent-based modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 926-937.
    8. Jie Li & Qichao Ban & Xueming (Jimmy) Chen & Jiawei Yao, 2019. "Glazing Sizing in Large Atrium Buildings: A Perspective of Balancing Daylight Quantity and Visual Comfort," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Haider Latif & Samira Rahnama & Alessandro Maccarini & Goran Hultmark & Peter V. Nielsen & Alireza Afshari, 2022. "Precision Ventilation in an Open-Plan Office: A New Application of Active Chilled Beam (ACB) with a JetCone Feature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Omar al-Ani & Sanjoy Das & Hongyu Wu, 2023. "Imitation Learning with Deep Attentive Tabular Neural Networks for Environmental Prediction and Control in Smart Home," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Abhinandana Boodi & Karim Beddiar & Malek Benamour & Yassine Amirat & Mohamed Benbouzid, 2018. "Intelligent Systems for Building Energy and Occupant Comfort Optimization: A State of the Art Review and Recommendations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, September.
    12. Balali, Amirhossein & Yunusa-Kaltungo, Akilu & Edwards, Rodger, 2023. "A systematic review of passive energy consumption optimisation strategy selection for buildings through multiple criteria decision-making techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    13. Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Ayodele, T.R. & Akinola, O.A., 2017. "User satisfaction-induced demand side load management in residential buildings with user budget constraint," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 352-366.
    14. Zhang, Sheng & Lin, Zhang, 2020. "Standard effective temperature based adaptive-rational thermal comfort model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    15. Wu, Bingjie & Cai, Wenjian & Chen, Haoran, 2021. "A model-based multi-objective optimization of energy consumption and thermal comfort for active chilled beam systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    16. Nematchoua, Modeste Kameni & Tchinda, René & Orosa, José A., 2014. "Thermal comfort and energy consumption in modern versus traditional buildings in Cameroon: A questionnaire-based statistical study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 687-699.
    17. Wu, Yujie & Kämpf, Jérôme H. & Scartezzini, Jean-Louis, 2019. "Automated ‘Eye-sight’ Venetian blinds based on an embedded photometric device with real-time daylighting computing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Yang, Shiyu & Wan, Man Pun & Ng, Bing Feng & Dubey, Swapnil & Henze, Gregor P. & Chen, Wanyu & Baskaran, Krishnamoorthy, 2021. "Model predictive control for integrated control of air-conditioning and mechanical ventilation, lighting and shading systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    19. Paulína Šujanová & Monika Rychtáriková & Tiago Sotto Mayor & Affan Hyder, 2019. "A Healthy, Energy-Efficient and Comfortable Indoor Environment, a Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-37, April.
    20. Xie, Xing & Chen, Xing-ni & Xu, Bin & Pei, Gang, 2022. "Investigation of occupied/unoccupied period on thermal comfort in Guangzhou: Challenges and opportunities of public buildings with high window-wall ratio," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4303-:d:1083164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.