IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3370-d1066244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost and Heat Integration Analysis for CO 2 Removal Using Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquid-ASPEN PLUS Modelling Study

Author

Listed:
  • Tooba Qureshi

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar)

  • Majeda Khraisheh

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar)

  • Fares Almomani

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar)

Abstract

The recent advancement in efficient and recoverable CO 2 capture solvents has been stimulated by the environmental harm resulting from the accumulation of greenhouse gases. Ionic liquids (ILs) and IL-based solvents have given rise to a novel method of CO 2 collection that is highly efficient, economical, and environmentally benign. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the implementation of this process on a wider scale, and it has limitations, including high solvent costs. This simulated study shows that [EMIM][NTF 2 ] can remove up to 99.4% of the CO 2 from industrial waste effluents using three distinct compositions. Following an economic study using a 20-year plant life estimate, with a plant capacity of 4000 kg/h (206.165 kmol/h) for the raw mixed stream flow (inlet) and a maximum CO 2 capacity of 38.1 kmol/h, it was determined that the process’s overall annualized cost was USD 2.1 million with operating expenses being USD 1.8 million. The Aspen Activated Energy Analysis’s recommendation of adding a heat exchanger, with a payback year of 0.0586 years, a 23.34 m 2 area, and potential energy cost savings of USD 340,182/Year was also implemented successfully. These findings propose a conceptual framework for the development of novel ionic liquids for CO 2 capture. It also demonstrates that sustainable [EMIM][Tf2N]-based absorption techniques for CO 2 capture have the potential to be an industrial technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Tooba Qureshi & Majeda Khraisheh & Fares Almomani, 2023. "Cost and Heat Integration Analysis for CO 2 Removal Using Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquid-ASPEN PLUS Modelling Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3370-:d:1066244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3370/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3370/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tajima, Hideo & Yamasaki, Akihiro & Kiyono, Fumio, 2004. "Energy consumption estimation for greenhouse gas separation processes by clathrate hydrate formation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 1713-1729.
    2. Mondal, Monoj Kumar & Balsora, Hemant Kumar & Varshney, Prachi, 2012. "Progress and trends in CO2 capture/separation technologies: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 431-441.
    3. Song, Chun Feng & Kitamura, Yutaka & Li, Shu Hong, 2012. "Evaluation of Stirling cooler system for cryogenic CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 491-501.
    4. Perevertaylenko, Olexander Yu. & Gariev, Andriy O. & Damartzis, Theodoros & Tovazhnyanskyy, Leonid L. & Kapustenko, Petro O. & Arsenyeva, Olga P., 2015. "Searches of cost effective ways for amine absorption unit design in CO2 post-combustion capture process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 105-112.
    5. Xie, Yujiao & Björkmalm, Johanna & Ma, Chunyan & Willquist, Karin & Yngvesson, Johan & Wallberg, Ola & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2018. "Techno-economic evaluation of biogas upgrading using ionic liquids in comparison with industrially used technology in Scandinavian anaerobic digestion plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 742-750.
    6. Miladi, Rihab & Frikha, Nader & Gabsi, Slimane, 2021. "Modeling and energy analysis of a solar thermal vacuum membrane distillation coupled with a liquid ring vacuum pump," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1395-1407.
    7. Salvia, Monica & Reckien, Diana & Pietrapertosa, Filomena & Eckersley, Peter & Spyridaki, Niki-Artemis & Krook-Riekkola, Anna & Olazabal, Marta & De Gregorio Hurtado, Sonia & Simoes, Sofia G. & Genele, 2021. "Will climate mitigation ambitions lead to carbon neutrality? An analysis of the local-level plans of 327 cities in the EU," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    8. Gang Xu & Feifei Liang & Yongping Yang & Yue Hu & Kai Zhang & Wenyi Liu, 2014. "An Improved CO 2 Separation and Purification System Based on Cryogenic Separation and Distillation Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Nejat, Payam & Jomehzadeh, Fatemeh & Taheri, Mohammad Mahdi & Gohari, Mohammad & Abd. Majid, Muhd Zaimi, 2015. "A global review of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO2 emitting countries)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 843-862.
    10. Ma, Chunyan & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis and performance comparison of aqueous deep eutectic solvent and other physical absorbents for biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 437-447.
    11. Xie, Yujiao & Zhang, Yingying & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2014. "Energy consumption analysis for CO2 separation using imidazolium-based ionic liquids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 325-335.
    12. Lynnette A. Blanchard & Dan Hancu & Eric J. Beckman & Joan F. Brennecke, 1999. "Green processing using ionic liquids and CO2," Nature, Nature, vol. 399(6731), pages 28-29, May.
    13. Henrik Von Storch & Sonja Becker-Hardt & Christian Sattler, 2018. "(Solar) Mixed Reforming of Methane: Potential and Limits in Utilizing CO 2 as Feedstock for Syngas Production—A Thermodynamic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Liu, Yinan & Zhao, Qing & He, Junnan & Zhao, Li, 2017. "Carbon pump: Fundamental theory and applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1131-1143.
    2. Edyta Słupek & Patrycja Makoś & Jacek Gębicki, 2020. "Theoretical and Economic Evaluation of Low-Cost Deep Eutectic Solvents for Effective Biogas Upgrading to Bio-Methane," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Wang, Honglin & Ma, Chunyan & Yang, Zhuhong & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2020. "Improving high-pressure water scrubbing through process integration and solvent selection for biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    4. Ma, Chunyan & Xie, Yujiao & Ji, Xiaoyan & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua, 2018. "Modeling, simulation and evaluation of biogas upgrading using aqueous choline chloride/urea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1269-1283.
    5. Xie, Yujiao & Björkmalm, Johanna & Ma, Chunyan & Willquist, Karin & Yngvesson, Johan & Wallberg, Ola & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2018. "Techno-economic evaluation of biogas upgrading using ionic liquids in comparison with industrially used technology in Scandinavian anaerobic digestion plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 742-750.
    6. Chen, Yifeng & Song, Shuailong & Li, Ning & Wu, Jian & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2022. "Developing hybrid 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide/titanium dioxide/water absorbent for CO2 separation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    7. Ma, Chunyan & Wang, Nan & Ye, Nannan & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2021. "CO2 capture using ionic liquid-based hybrid solvents from experiment to process evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    8. Chen, Yifeng & Sun, Yunhao & Yang, Zhuhong & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2020. "CO2 separation using a hybrid choline-2-pyrrolidine-carboxylic acid/polyethylene glycol/water absorbent," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    9. Song, Chunfeng & Kitamura, Yutaka & Li, Shuhong, 2014. "Energy analysis of the cryogenic CO2 capture process based on Stirling coolers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 580-589.
    10. Ma, Chunyan & Liu, Chang & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis and performance comparison of aqueous deep eutectic solvent and other physical absorbents for biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 437-447.
    11. Xie, Yujiao & Zhang, Yingying & Lu, Xiaohua & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2014. "Energy consumption analysis for CO2 separation using imidazolium-based ionic liquids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 325-335.
    12. Babu, Ponnivalavan & Linga, Praveen & Kumar, Rajnish & Englezos, Peter, 2015. "A review of the hydrate based gas separation (HBGS) process for carbon dioxide pre-combustion capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 261-279.
    13. Song, Chunfeng & Liu, Qingling & Ji, Na & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Jun & Li, Yang & Kitamura, Yutaka, 2017. "Reducing the energy consumption of membrane-cryogenic hybrid CO2 capture by process optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 29-39.
    14. Aghaie, Mahsa & Rezaei, Nima & Zendehboudi, Sohrab, 2018. "A systematic review on CO2 capture with ionic liquids: Current status and future prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 502-525.
    15. Theo, Wai Lip & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Hashim, Haslenda & Mustaffa, Azizul Azri & Ho, Wai Shin, 2016. "Review of pre-combustion capture and ionic liquid in carbon capture and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1633-1663.
    16. Kobayashi, Makoto & Akiho, Hiroyuki & Nakao, Yoshinobu, 2015. "Performance evaluation of porous sodium aluminate sorbent for halide removal process in oxy-fuel IGCC power generation plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 320-327.
    17. Andrew Chapman & Timothy Fraser & Melanie Dennis, 2019. "Investigating Ties between Energy Policy and Social Equity Research: A Citation Network Analysis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    19. Cai, Benan & Long, Chengjun & Du, Qiaochen & Zhang, Wenchao & Hou, Yandong & Wang, Haijun & Cai, Weihua, 2023. "Analysis of a spray flash desalination system driven by low-grade waste heat with different intermittencies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    20. Remi-Erempagamo Tariyemienyo Meindinyo & Thor Martin Svartaas, 2016. "Gas Hydrate Growth Kinetics: A Parametric Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-29, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3370-:d:1066244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.