IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16419-d1290699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Assessment of Green Business Environments Using the Environmental–Economic Index: The Case of China

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng-Wen Lee

    (Department of International Business, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan)

  • Chin-Chuan Wang

    (Ph.D. Program in Business, College of Business, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan)

  • Hui-Hsin Hsu

    (Ph.D. Program in Business, College of Business, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan)

  • Peiyi Kong

    (School of Economics and Management, Xiamen Nanyang University, Xiamen 361012, China)

Abstract

The quality of a country’s business environment speaks volumes about its government’s capacity and competitiveness. Unfortunately, the current system only evaluates countries and cities, overlooking the business environments of individual provinces. To address this issue, this study utilizes a green and sustainable development approach to evaluate the business environments of 30 provinces/municipalities in China. By incorporating ecological and environmental protection and sustainable development indicators, a novel green business environment index is constructed and analyzed to determine its impact on macroeconomic sustainable development and micro-enterprise operation. Taking into account the business environment index established by the World Bank and other organizations, this evaluation system adds ecological and environmental indicators specific to each province/municipality in China from the year 2011 to 2020. The result is a provincial green business environment evaluation index system consisting of 5 primary indicators and 30 secondary indicators. Principal component analysis (PCA) is then applied to rank the green business environment for each province/municipality. Furthermore, the overall green business environment of the Eastern region is superior to that of the Central and Western regions, highlighting the uneven development of the business environment in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng-Wen Lee & Chin-Chuan Wang & Hui-Hsin Hsu & Peiyi Kong, 2023. "The Assessment of Green Business Environments Using the Environmental–Economic Index: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16419-:d:1290699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16419/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16419/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Paul Elhorst, 2014. "Dynamic Spatial Panels: Models, Methods and Inferences," SpringerBriefs in Regional Science, in: Spatial Econometrics, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 95-119, Springer.
    2. James P. LeSage & R. Kelley Pace, 2018. "Spatial econometric Monte Carlo studies: raising the bar," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 17-34, August.
    3. Agnieszka Ma³kowska & Ma³gorzata Uhruska, 2022. "Factors affecting SMEs growth: the case of the real estate valuation service industry," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(1), pages 79-108, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Xinye & Li, Fanghua & Song, Shunfeng & Yu, Yihua, 2013. "Central government's infrastructure investment across Chinese regions: A dynamic spatial panel data approach," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 264-276.
    2. Wang, Xiong & Wang, Xiao & Ren, Xiaohang & Wen, Fenghua, 2022. "Can digital financial inclusion affect CO2 emissions of China at the prefecture level? Evidence from a spatial econometric approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    3. Karl Geisler & Mark Nichols, 2016. "Riverboat casino gambling impacts on employment and income in host and surrounding counties," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 56(1), pages 101-123, January.
    4. Oumarou Zallé & Idrissa M. Ouédraogo, 2021. "Spillover effects of corruption and democracy on territorial attractiveness of foreign direct investment in sub‐Saharan Africa," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 33(4), pages 756-769, December.
    5. Mengjie Tian & Mingyong Hong & Ji Wang, 2023. "Land resources, market-oriented reform and high-quality agricultural development," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4165-4197, December.
    6. Atems, Bebonchu, 2015. "Another look at tax policy and state economic growth: The long-run and short-run of it," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 64-67.
    7. Ana León-Gómez & José Manuel Santos-Jaén & Daniel Ruiz-Palomo & Mercedes Palacios-Manzano, 2022. "Disentangling the impact of ICT adoption on SMEs performance: the mediating roles of corporate social responsibility and innovation," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(3), pages 831-866, September.
    8. Yongfu Huang & M. G. Quibria, 2013. "Green Growth: Theory and Evidence," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2013-056, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    9. Chen, Xi, 2017. "Do Skewed Sex Ratios Among Children Promote Parental Smoking? Longitudinal Evidence from Rural China," GLO Discussion Paper Series 159, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    10. Gao, Kang & Yuan, Yijun, 2022. "Government intervention, spillover effect and urban innovation performance: Empirical evidence from national innovative city pilot policy in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Gibson, John & Datt, Gaurav & Murgai, Rinku & Ravallion, Martin, 2017. "For India’s Rural Poor, Growing Towns Matter More Than Growing Cities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 413-429.
    12. Sven Wardenburg & Thomas Brenner, 2021. "Analysing the spatio-temporal diffusion of economic change - advanced statistical approach and exemplary application," Working Papers on Innovation and Space 2021-01, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    13. Takafumi Kato, 2020. "Likelihood-based strategies for estimating unknown parameters and predicting missing data in the simultaneous autoregressive model," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 143-176, January.
    14. Ghazala Aziz & Zouheir Mighri, 2022. "Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Forestry in China: A Spatial Panel Data Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-40, October.
    15. Tamás Krisztin & Philipp Piribauer, 2021. "A Bayesian spatial autoregressive logit model with an empirical application to European regional FDI flows," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 231-257, July.
    16. Chao Li & John Gibson & Geua Boe-Gibson, 2022. "Rising immigration and falling native-born home ownership: a spatial econometric analysis for New Zealand," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(3), pages 318-325, September.
    17. Guilherme Resende & Alexandre Carvalho & Patrícia Sakowski & Túlio Cravo, 2016. "Evaluating multiple spatial dimensions of economic growth in Brazil using spatial panel data models," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 56(1), pages 1-31, January.
    18. Anupam Nanda & Jia-Huey Yeh, 2016. "Reflected Glory Versus Repulsive Envy: How Do the Smiths Feel About the House of the Joneses?," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 30(3), pages 317-341, September.
    19. Zheng, Xinye & Yu, Yihua & Wang, Jing & Deng, Huihui, 2013. "Identifying the determinants and spatial nexus of provincial carbon intensity in China: A dynamic spatial panel approach," MPRA Paper 56088, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Shahnazi, Rouhollah & Dehghan Shabani, Zahra, 2021. "The effects of renewable energy, spatial spillover of CO2 emissions and economic freedom on CO2 emissions in the EU," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 293-307.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16419-:d:1290699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.