IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16175-d1284847.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social and Economic Impact Assessment of Coal Power Phase-Down at the Provincial Level: An Entropy-Based TOPSIS Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Changhong Zhao

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Jiaxuan Chen

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Xiaowen Yang

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Jiahai Yuan

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
    Beijing Key Laboratory of New Energy and Low-Carbon Development, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

With the rollout of the carbon peak and neutrality targets, conventional coal-fired power plants will gradually be phased down in China’s power system in an orderly manner. The economic and social impact of the energy transition is a vital topic that requires scientific measurements and evaluation. In this paper, we establish a comprehensive approach to assess the impact of provincial coal power phase-down with 11 indicators covering dimensions of economy, society, and industry. An entropy-based Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approach is adopted to calculate entropy weight, relative closeness, and other evaluation benchmark data. Then, the influence degree in 30 provinces is ranked based on the assessment. The results show that there is a significant regional imbalance in the process of coal power phase-down, among which Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, and other coal base provinces are the most vulnerable regions bound by their huge raw coal production and coal industry employment. Although the coal power industry is less affected than the coal industry, it will face pressure from the optimization of coal power units, followed by the dual impact of taxation and employment issues. Finally, the potential impacts of coal power phase-down and policy implications are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Changhong Zhao & Jiaxuan Chen & Xiaowen Yang & Jiahai Yuan, 2023. "Social and Economic Impact Assessment of Coal Power Phase-Down at the Provincial Level: An Entropy-Based TOPSIS Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16175-:d:1284847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16175/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16175/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oei, Pao-Yu & Hermann, Hauke & Herpich, Philipp & Holtemöller, Oliver & Lünenbürger, Benjamin & Schult, Christoph, 2020. "Coal phase-out in Germany – Implications and policies for affected regions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. Heinrichs, Heidi Ursula & Markewitz, Peter, 2017. "Long-term impacts of a coal phase-out in Germany as part of a greenhouse gas mitigation strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 234-246.
    3. Jin, Yana & Andersson, Henrik & Zhang, Shiqiu, 2017. "China’s Cap on Coal and the Efficiency of Local Interventions: A Benefit-Cost Analysis of Phasing out Coal in Power Plants and in Households in Beijing 1," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 147-186, July.
    4. Paul J. Burke & Rohan Best & Frank Jotzo, 2019. "Closures of coal‐fired power stations in Australia: local unemployment effects," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(1), pages 142-165, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Kittel & Leonard Goeke & Claudia Kemfert & Pao-Yu Oei & Christian von Hirschhausen, 2020. "Scenarios for Coal-Exit in Germany—A Model-Based Analysis and Implications in the European Context," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Osorio, Sebastian & Pietzcker, Robert C. & Pahle, Michael & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2020. "How to deal with the risks of phasing out coal in Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. Anke, Carl-Philipp & Hobbie, Hannes & Schreiber, Steffi & Möst, Dominik, 2020. "Coal phase-outs and carbon prices: Interactions between EU emission trading and national carbon mitigation policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Mwampashi, Muthe Mathias & Nikitopoulos, Christina Sklibosios & Konstandatos, Otto & Rai, Alan, 2021. "Wind generation and the dynamics of electricity prices in Australia," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Bruns, Daniel & Thomsen, Stephan L., 2025. "The Impact of Germany's Coal Phase-Out on Local Property Values," VfS Annual Conference 2025 (Cologne): Revival of Industrial Policy 325450, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    6. Paul J. Burke, 2023. "On the way out: Government revenues from fossil fuels in Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(1), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Rivera, Nathaly M. & Loveridge, Scott, 2022. "Coal-to-gas fuel switching and its effects on housing prices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    8. Fortes, Patrícia & Simoes, Sofia G. & Gouveia, João Pedro & Seixas, Júlia, 2019. "Electricity, the silver bullet for the deep decarbonisation of the energy system? Cost-effectiveness analysis for Portugal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 292-303.
    9. Best, Rohan & Trück, Stefan, 2020. "Capital and policy impacts on Australian small-scale solar installations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. Marina Blohm, 2021. "An Enabling Framework to Support the Sustainable Energy Transition at the National Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Gillessen, B. & Heinrichs, H. & Hake, J.-F. & Allelein, H.-J., 2019. "Natural gas as a bridge to sustainability: Infrastructure expansion regarding energy security and system transition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Tan, Hao & Thurbon, Elizabeth & Kim, Sung-Young & Mathews, John A., 2021. "Overcoming incumbent resistance to the clean energy shift: How local governments act as change agents in coal power station closures in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Liu, Yanyan & Huang, Guohe & Chen, Jiapei & Zhang, Xiaoyue & Zheng, Xiaogui & Zhai, Mengyu, 2022. "Development of an optimization-aided small modular reactor siting model – A case study of Saskatchewan, Canada," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    14. Cormac Lynch & Yeliz Simsek & Jean-Francois Mercure & Panagiotis Fragkos & Julien Lefèvre & Thomas Le Gallic & Kostas Fragkiadakis & Leonidas Paroussos & Dimitris Fragkiadakis & Florian Leblanc & Femk, 2024. "Structural change and socio-economic disparities in a net zero transition," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 607-629, October.
    15. Gillich, Annika & Hufendiek, Kai & Klempp, Nikolai, 2020. "Extended policy mix in the power sector: How a coal phase-out redistributes costs and profits among power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    16. Weber, Juliane & Heinrichs, Heidi Ursula & Gillessen, Bastian & Schumann, Diana & Hörsch, Jonas & Brown, Tom & Witthaut, Dirk, 2019. "Counter-intuitive behaviour of energy system models under CO2 caps and prices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 22-30.
    17. Löffler, Konstantin & Burandt, Thorsten & Hainsch, Karlo & Oei, Pao-Yu & Seehaus, Frederik & Wejda, Felix, 2022. "Chances and barriers for Germany's low carbon transition - Quantifying uncertainties in key influential factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    18. He, Haonan & Chen, Wenze & Zhou, Qi, 2023. "Subsidy allocation strategies for power industry’s clean transition under Bayesian Nash equilibrium," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    19. Akerboom, Sanne & Botzen, Wouter & Buijze, Anoeska & Michels, Ank & van Rijswick, Marleen, 2020. "Meeting goals of sustainability policy: CO2 emission reduction, cost-effectiveness and societal acceptance. An analysis of the proposal to phase-out coal in the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    20. Bernhard-Johannes Jesse & Simon Morgenthaler & Bastian Gillessen & Simon Burges & Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs, 2020. "Potential for Optimization in European Power Plant Fleet Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16175-:d:1284847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.