IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p14677-d1256676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

System Design, Optimization and 2nd Law Analysis of a 100 MWe Double Reheat s-CO 2 Power Plant at Full Load and Part Loads

Author

Listed:
  • Sreekanth Manavalla

    (Electric Vehicle Incubation, Testing and Research Centre, Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai, Chennai 600127, India
    School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai, Chennai 600127, India)

  • Feroskhan M.

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai, Chennai 600127, India)

  • Joseph Daniel

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai, Chennai 600127, India)

  • Sivakumar Ramasamy

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai, Chennai 600127, India)

  • T. M. Yunus Khan

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Rahmath Ulla Baig

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Naif Almakayeel

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Bhanu Kiran Voddin Tirumalapur

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai, Chennai 600127, India)

Abstract

Super-critical Carbon dioxide (s-CO 2 ) power plants are considered to be efficient and environmentally friendly compared to the traditional Rankine cycle-based steam power plants and Brayton cycle-based gas turbine power plants. In this work, the system design of a coal-fired 100 MWe double reheat s-CO 2 power plant is presented. The system is also optimized for efficiency with turbine inlet pressures and the recompression ratio as the variables. The components needed, mass flow rates of various streams and their pressures at various locations in the system have been established. The plant has been studied based on 1st and 2nd laws at full load and at part loads of 80%, 60% and 40%. Operating parameters such as mass flow rate, pressure and temperature have considerably changed in comparison to full load operation. It was also observed that the 1st law efficiency is 53.96%, 53.93%, 52.63% and 50% while the 2nd law efficiency is 51.88%, 51.86%, 50.61% and 48.1% at 100%, 80%, 60% and 40% loads, respectively. The power plant demonstrated good performance even at part loads, especially at 80% load, while the performance deteriorated at lower loads. At full load, the highest amount of exergy destruction is found in the main heater (36.6%) and re-heaters (23.2% and 19.6%) followed by the high-temperature recuperator (5.7%) and cooler (4.1%). Similar trends were observed for the part load operation. It has been found that the recompression ratio should be kept high (>0.5) at lower loads in order to match the performance at higher loads. Combustion and heat exchange due to finite temperature differences are the main causes of exergy destruction, followed by pressure drop.

Suggested Citation

  • Sreekanth Manavalla & Feroskhan M. & Joseph Daniel & Sivakumar Ramasamy & T. M. Yunus Khan & Rahmath Ulla Baig & Naif Almakayeel & Bhanu Kiran Voddin Tirumalapur, 2023. "System Design, Optimization and 2nd Law Analysis of a 100 MWe Double Reheat s-CO 2 Power Plant at Full Load and Part Loads," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14677-:d:1256676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14677/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14677/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Furlan, Claudia & Mortarino, Cinzia, 2018. "Forecasting the impact of renewable energies in competition with non-renewable sources," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1879-1886.
    2. Yin, Chungen & Yan, Jinyue, 2016. "Oxy-fuel combustion of pulverized fuels: Combustion fundamentals and modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 742-762.
    3. Xingyan, Bian & Wang, Xuan & Wang, Rui & Cai, Jinwen & Tian, Hua & Shu, Gequn, 2022. "Optimal selection of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle layouts based on part-load performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    4. Bai, Wengang & Li, Hongzhi & Zhang, Lei & Zhang, Yifan & Yang, Yu & Zhang, Chun & Yao, Mingyu, 2021. "Energy and exergy analyses of an improved recompression supercritical CO2 cycle for coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Fan, Gang & Du, Yang & Li, Hang & Dai, Yiping, 2021. "Off-design behavior investigation of the combined supercritical CO2 and organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Yue & Zhan, Jun & Jia, Boqing & Chen, Ranjing & Si, Fengqi, 2023. "Optimum design of bivariate operation strategy for a supercritical/ transcritical CO2 hybrid waste heat recovery system driven by gas turbine exhaust," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    2. Zhang, Xin & Chen, Zhichao & Hou, Jian & Liu, Zheng & Zeng, Lingyan & Li, Zhengqi, 2022. "Evaluation of wide-range coal combustion performance of a novel down-fired combustion technology based on gas–solid two-phase flow characteristics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    3. Ma, Ning & Meng, Fugui & Hong, Wenpeng & Li, Haoran & Niu, Xiaojuan, 2023. "Thermodynamic assessment of the dry-cooling supercritical Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar power tower plant enabled by CO2-propane mixture," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 649-663.
    4. Bai, Wengang & Li, Hongzhi & Zhang, Xuwei & Qiao, Yongqiang & Zhang, Chun & Gao, Wei & Yao, Mingyu, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of CO2–SF6 mixture working fluid supercritical Brayton cycle used for solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    5. Díez, Luis I. & García-Mariaca, Alexander & Canalís, Paula & Llera, Eva, 2023. "Oxy-combustion characteristics of torrefied biomass and blends under O2/N2, O2/CO2 and O2/CO2/H2O atmospheres," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    6. Li, Shiyuan & Xu, Mingxin & Jia, Lufei & Tan, Li & Lu, Qinggang, 2016. "Influence of operating parameters on N2O emission in O2/CO2 combustion with high oxygen concentration in circulating fluidized bed," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 197-209.
    7. Mansir, Ibrahim B. & Ben-Mansour, Rached & Habib, Mohamed A., 2018. "Oxy-fuel combustion in a two-pass oxygen transport reactor for fire tube boiler application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 828-840.
    8. Lupiáñez, Carlos & Carmen Mayoral, M. & Díez, Luis I. & Pueyo, Eloy & Espatolero, Sergio & Manuel Andrés, J., 2016. "The role of limestone during fluidized bed oxy-combustion of coal and biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 670-680.
    9. Li, Zhi & Wang, Lei & Jiang, Ruicheng & Wang, Bingzheng & Yu, Xiaonan & Huang, Rui & Yu, Xiaoli, 2022. "Experimental investigations on dynamic performance of organic Rankine cycle integrated with latent thermal energy storage under transient engine conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    10. Ramadan, Islam A. & Ibrahim, Abdelmaged H. & Abou-Arab, Tharwat W. & Rashwan, Sherif S. & Nemitallah, Medhat A. & Habib, Mohamed A., 2016. "Effects of oxidizer flexibility and bluff-body blockage ratio on flammability limits of diffusion flames," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 19-28.
    11. Zhou, Dequn & Wu, Changsong & Wang, Qunwei & Zha, Donglan, 2019. "Response of scale and leverage of thermal power enterprises to renewable power enterprises in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Muhammad Ikram, 2021. "Models for Predicting Non-Renewable Energy Competing with Renewable Source for Sustainable Energy Development: Case of Asia and Oceania Region," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 133-160, December.
    13. Gu, Tianbao & Yin, Chungen & Ma, Wenchao & Chen, Guanyi, 2019. "Municipal solid waste incineration in a packed bed: A comprehensive modeling study with experimental validation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 127-139.
    14. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Tola, Vittorio & Cau, Giorgio, 2017. "Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for CO2-free power generation from coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 426-439.
    15. Wu, Pengzhi & Liu, Changchun & Wen, Hu & Luo, Zhenmin & Fan, Shixing & Mi, Wansheng, 2023. "Experimental investigation of jet impingement during accidental release of liquid CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    16. Cheng, Kunlin & Li, Jiahui & Yu, Jianchi & Fu, Chuanjie & Qin, Jiang & Jing, Wuxing, 2023. "Novel thermoelectric generator enhanced supercritical carbon dioxide closed-Brayton-cycle power generation systems: Performance comparison and configuration optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    17. Dingchen Wu & Mingshan Wei & Ran Tian & Siyu Zheng & Jundi He, 2022. "A Review of Flow and Heat Transfer Characteristics of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide under Cooling Conditions in Energy and Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-28, November.
    18. Xu, Mingxin & Li, Shiyuan & Wu, Yinghai & Jia, Lufei & Lu, Qinggang, 2017. "The characteristics of recycled NO reduction over char during oxy-fuel fluidized bed combustion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 553-562.
    19. Zabrodiec, D. & Massmeyer, A. & Hees, J. & Hatzfeld, O. & Kneer, R., 2021. "Flow pattern and behavior of 40 kWth pulverized torrefied biomass flames under atmospheric and oxy-fuel conditions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    20. Modlinski, Norbert & Hardy, Tomasz, 2017. "Development of high-temperature corrosion risk monitoring system in pulverized coal boilers based on reducing conditions identification and CFD simulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1124-1137.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14677-:d:1256676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.