IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14328-d1249921.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Factors Impact Visitors’ Intentions to Use Location-Based AR Games? An Empirical Study from Chinese Cultural Heritage Sites

Author

Listed:
  • Jiahui Guo

    (Department of Smart Experience Design, Graduate School of Techno Design, Kookmin University, Seoul 02707, Republic of Korea)

  • Younghwan Pan

    (Department of Smart Experience Design, Graduate School of Techno Design, Kookmin University, Seoul 02707, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Location-based AR games have been discussed as a promising means of providing visitors with meaningful experiences at cultural heritage sites, with great potential to enhance users’ positive emotions and well-being. This research created a conceptual model to empirically evaluate the impact of location-based AR games on the experiential intentions of cultural heritage sites based on the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. The model was empirically validated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and tested using structural equation modeling (SEM) on 260 visitors who had played location-based AR games at several Chinese cultural heritage sites. The results suggested that visitors’ positive emotions (fulfillment, enjoyment, and self-existence) in location-based AR games positively impact the intention to use location-based AR games. Further, this study demonstrated that competence, relatedness, immersion, presence, interaction existence, emotional existence, and social existence significantly impact tourists’ positive emotional experience. The findings of this study help to complement the application of positive-affect expansion and building theory to the field of cultural heritage research while providing practical insights into the experience of cultural heritage sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiahui Guo & Younghwan Pan, 2023. "What Factors Impact Visitors’ Intentions to Use Location-Based AR Games? An Empirical Study from Chinese Cultural Heritage Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14328-:d:1249921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14328/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14328/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xinlu Wen & Marios Sotiriadis & Shiwei Shen, 2023. "Determining the Key Drivers for the Acceptance and Usage of AR and VR in Cultural Heritage Monuments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Lamberto Zollo & Riccardo Rialti & Anna Marrucci & Cristiano Ciappei, 2022. "How do museums foster loyalty in tech-savvy visitors? The role of social media and digital experience," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(18), pages 2991-3008, September.
    3. Jung, Timothy & Chung, Namho & Leue, M. Claudia, 2015. "The determinants of recommendations to use augmented reality technologies: The case of a Korean theme park," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 75-86.
    4. Mariapina Trunfio & Salvatore Campana, 2020. "A visitors’ experience model for mixed reality in the museum," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(9), pages 1053-1058, May.
    5. Mariapina Trunfio & Salvatore Campana & Adele Magnelli, 2020. "Measuring the impact of functional and experiential mixed reality elements on a museum visit," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(16), pages 1990-2008, August.
    6. Ana M. Domínguez-Quintero & M.Rosario González-Rodríguez & Brendan Paddison, 2020. "The mediating role of experience quality on authenticity and satisfaction in the context of cultural-heritage tourism," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 248-260, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junwei Chen & Xiaohong Wu & Ivan Ka Wai Lai, 2023. "A Systematic Literature Review of Virtual Technology in Hospitality and Tourism (2013–2022)," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    2. Russell B. Williams & Natasa Slak-Valek, 2019. "Pokémon GO is serious leisure that increases the touristic engagement, physical activity and sense of happiness of players," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 515-533, December.
    3. Sebastian Molinillo & Francisco Rejón-Guardia & Rafael Anaya-Sánchez, 2023. "Exploring the antecedents of customers’ willingness to use service robots in restaurants," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(1), pages 167-193, March.
    4. Elena Bonel & Mauro Capestro & Eleonora Di Maria, 2023. "How COVID-19 impacted cultural consumption: an explorative analysis of Gen Z’s digital museum experiences," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2023(2), pages 135-160, June.
    5. Dacko, Scott G., 2017. "Enabling smart retail settings via mobile augmented reality shopping apps," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 243-256.
    6. Siqi Emily Lu & Brent Moyle & Sacha Reid & Elaine Yang & Biqiang Liu, 2023. "Technology and museum visitor experiences: a four stage model of evolution," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 151-174, June.
    7. Holdack, Eric & Lurie-Stoyanov, Katja & Fromme, Harro Fabian, 2022. "The role of perceived enjoyment and perceived informativeness in assessing the acceptance of AR wearables," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    8. Fan, Xiaojun & Chai, Zeli & Deng, Nianqi & Dong, Xuebing, 2020. "Adoption of augmented reality in online retailing and consumers’ product attitude: A cognitive perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    9. Wang, Xia & Li, Xiang (Robert) & Zhen, Feng & Zhang, JinHe, 2016. "How smart is your tourist attraction?: Measuring tourist preferences of smart tourism attractions via a FCEM-AHP and IPA approach," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 309-320.
    10. Seung Jae Lee, 0. "A review of audio guides in the era of smart tourism," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-11.
    11. Whang, Jeong Bin & Song, Ji Hee & Choi, Boreum & Lee, Jong-Ho, 2021. "The effect of Augmented Reality on purchase intention of beauty products: The roles of consumers’ control," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 275-284.
    12. Koen Arts & Maiara Thaisa Oliveira Rabelo & Daniela Maimoni De Figueiredo & Georgina Maffey & Antonio Augusto Rossotto Ioris & Pierre Girard, 2018. "Online and Offline Representations of Biocultural Diversity: A Political Ecology Perspective on Nature-Based Tourism and Indigenous Communities in the Brazilian Pantanal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Nancyprabha Pushparaj & V. J. Sivakumar & Manoraj Natarajan & A. Bhuvaneskumar, 2023. "Two decades of DeLone and Mclean IS success model: a scientometrics analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 2469-2491, June.
    14. Filomena Izzo, 2017. "Technological Innovation and Management Skills: Case Study of the Museo Archeologico di Napoli," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(8), pages 44-51, August.
    15. Francesca De Canio & Elisa Martinelli & Margherita Peruzzini & Sara Cavallaro, 2022. "Experiencing a Food Production Site Using Wearable Devices: The Indirect Impact of Immersion and Presence in VR Tours," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Choon Ching Ng & Chandrashekar Ramasamy, 2018. "Augmented Reality Marketing in Malaysia—Future Scenarios," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Timothy Jung & M. Claudia tom Dieck & Hyunae Lee & Namho Chung, 2020. "Relationships among Beliefs, Attitudes, Time Resources, Subjective Norms, and Intentions to Use Wearable Augmented Reality in Art Galleries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Jiamin Liu & Eusebio Chiahsin Leou & Chaozhan Chen & Xi Li, 2023. "Can Trust Bring Satisfaction to the Festival Under Pandemic?," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.
    19. Pam Lee & William Cannon Hunter & Namho Chung, 2020. "Smart Tourism City: Developments and Transformations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
    20. Seung Jae Lee, 2017. "A review of audio guides in the era of smart tourism," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 705-715, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14328-:d:1249921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.