IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13801-d1240961.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Revenue Generated via Composting and Recycling of Wastes Produced in the Greenhouse Tomato Supply Chain on Reducing Income Inequality: A Case Study of Türkiye

Author

Listed:
  • Hatice Türkten

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun 55139, Turkey)

Abstract

Investigating the potential impacts of composting and recycling wastes on income distribution is crucial to promote a fairer and more sustainable fresh tomato supply chain (FTSC). Therefore, this study aims to explore the potential of generating extra income from recycling of tomatoes waste generated along the FTSC, and to analyze the impact of that extra income on reducing income inequality among the FTSC actors. Data were collected from 136 greenhouse tomato producers, 60 wholesalers, 18 exporters, 120 domestic retailers, 22 overseas retailers, and 3 recycling facilities in Türkiye. Marketing cost, absolute marketing margin, relative marketing margin and net profit margin were used to economically analyze the FTSCs. Research results showed that the net profit share of the producers decreased with the increasing number of intermediaries. Additionally, revenue generated from composting and recycling of product loss and wastes increased the welfare of greenhouse producers more than the other supply chain actors. When taking into account the revenue generated from composting and recycling of wastes, the net profit of the producers increased by 9.85% at first FTSC, while it increased by 8.29% and 9.21% in the second and third FTSCs, respectively, compared to the prevailing conditions. The retailers were benefitted more from the extra revenue generated via composting and recycling of wastes compared to the wholesalers and exporters. However, the income gain of the domestic retailers and wholesalers from recycling was more when compared to the overseas ones. Close cooperation between producers, wholesalers, exporters, retailers, and recycling facilities is essential for the effective implementation of waste recycling initiatives. Organizing training and education programs focused on waste management can increase the extra income that producers and active intermediaries in FTSCs can generate from composting and recycling of tomato wastes. Offering financial incentives, grants, or subsidies can encourage producers and other actors within the supply chain to adopt waste recycling practices. Continuous research and innovation are crucial in identifying and developing new technologies, processes, and strategies to minimize food loss and waste. Introducing fair-trade practices may help to balance the income distribution among FTSC actors.

Suggested Citation

  • Hatice Türkten, 2023. "Impact of Revenue Generated via Composting and Recycling of Wastes Produced in the Greenhouse Tomato Supply Chain on Reducing Income Inequality: A Case Study of Türkiye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-12, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13801-:d:1240961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13801/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13801/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Traub, Lulama Ndibongo & Jayne, T.S., 2008. "The effects of price deregulation on maize marketing margins in South Africa," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 224-236, June.
    2. Murthy, D. Sreenivasa & Gajanana, T.M. & Sudha, M. & Dakshinamoorthy, V., 2007. "Marketing Losses and Their Impact on Marketing Margins: A Case Study of Banana in Karnataka," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 20(1).
    3. Chaboud, Géraldine & Moustier, Paule, 2021. "The role of diverse distribution channels in reducing food loss and waste: The case of the Cali tomato supply chain in Colombia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Yi-Tui Chen, 2016. "A Cost Analysis of Food Waste Composting in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Aishwarya Mohan & Ramesh Krishnan & Kaur Arshinder & John Vandore & Usha Ramanathan, 2023. "Management of Postharvest Losses and Wastages in the Indian Tomato Supply Chain—A Temperature-Controlled Storage Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Luca Secondi & Ludovica Principato & Luca Ruini & Matteo Guidi, 2019. "Reusing Food Waste in Food Manufacturing Companies: The Case of the Tomato-Sauce Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen-Tien Tsai, 2020. "Turning Food Waste into Value-Added Resources: Current Status and Regulatory Promotion in Taiwan," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-11, April.
    2. Felipe Maciel Cardoso & Carlos Gracia-Lázaro & Frederic Moisan & Sanjeev Goyal & Angel Sánchez & Yamir Moreno, 2020. "Effect of Network Topology and Node Centrality on Trading," Post-Print hal-03188212, HAL.
    3. Li, Kai & Long, Cheryl & Wan, Wei, 2019. "Public interest or regulatory capture: Theory and evidence from China’s airfare deregulation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 343-365.
    4. Deng, Wenyueyang & Zhang, Zenglian & Guo, Borui, 2024. "Firm-level carbon risk awareness and Green transformation: A research on the motivation and consequences from government regulation and regional development perspective," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Clara Cicatiello & Luca Secondi & Ludovica Principato, 2019. "Investigating Consumers’ Perception of Discounted Suboptimal Products at Retail Stores," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-10, July.
    6. Luo, Na & Olsen, Tava & Liu, Yanping & Zhang, Abraham, 2022. "Reducing food loss and waste in supply chain operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    7. Patrícia Guarnieri & Raiane C. C. de Aguiar & Karim M. Thomé & Eluiza Alberto de Morais Watanabe, 2021. "The Role of Logistics in Food Waste Reduction in Wholesalers and Small Retailers of Fruits and Vegetables: A Multiple Case Study," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Principato, Ludovica & Secondi, Luca & Cicatiello, Clara & Mattia, Giovanni, 2022. "Caring more about food: The unexpected positive effect of the Covid-19 lockdown on household food management and waste," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    9. Muhammed Cuhadar & Hakan Adanacıoglu & Naciye Oruc & Humeyra Sahin, 2019. "Comparison of Farmers’ Markets and District Markets in Terms of Marketing Efficiency: The Case of Seferihisar District in Izmir Province," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 7(3), pages 176-196, September.
    10. Kai Li & Cheryl Long & Wei Wan, 2019. "Public Interest or Regulatory Capture: Theory and Evidence from China’s Airfare Deregulation," Working Papers 2019-01, Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics (WISE), Xiamen University.
    11. Dithmer, Jan & Abdulai, Awudu, 2017. "Does trade openness contribute to food security? A dynamic panel analysis," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 218-230.
    12. Unknown, 2010. "Smallholder Marketing Behavior and Urban Consumption Patterns in Eastern and Southern Africa," Food Security Collaborative Policy Briefs 62155, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    13. Ludovica Principato & Alessio Leo & Giovanni Mattia & Carlo Alberto Pratesi, 2021. "The next step in sustainable dining: the restaurant food waste map for the management of food waste," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2021(3), pages 189-207, September.
    14. Jean Pierre Doussoulin, 2019. "A paradigm of the circular economy: the end of cheap nature?," Post-Print hal-02542701, HAL.
    15. John Baffes & Varun Kshirsagar & Donald Mitchell, 2019. "What Drives Local Food Prices? Evidence from the Tanzanian Maize Market," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 33(1), pages 160-184.
    16. Tschirley, David L. & Jayne, Thomas S., 2008. "Food Crises and Food Markets: Implications for Emergency Response in Southern Africa," Food Security International Development Working Papers 54559, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    17. Nour El Houda Chaher & Mehrez Chakchouk & Nils Engler & Abdallah Nassour & Michael Nelles & Moktar Hamdi, 2020. "Optimization of Food Waste and Biochar In-Vessel Co-Composting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    18. Núñez, Héctor M. & Otero, Jesús & Trujillo-Barrera, Andrés, 2023. "Wholesale price rigidities and exchange rate pass-through: Evidence from daily data of agricultural products," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    19. Steven J. R. Underhill & Yuchan Zhou & Shukrullah Sherzad & Lila Singh-Peterson & Semua Militini Tagoai, 2017. "Horticultural postharvest loss in municipal fruit and vegetable markets in Samoa," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(6), pages 1373-1383, December.
    20. Mabiso, Athur & Weatherspoon, Dave D., 2008. "Fuel and Food Tradeoffs: A Preliminary Analysis of South African Food Consumption Patterns," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6126, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13801-:d:1240961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.