IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p12796-d1223895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proactive and Reactive Approaches towards Sustainable Practices in Manufacturing Companies: Emerging Economies Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Haleem Fazli

    (Department of Management Sciences, Shaheed Benazir Bhuutto University, Sheringal, Dir Upper 182300, Pakistan)

  • Sami Farooq

    (School of Management Sciences, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Topi 23640, Pakistan)

  • Cheng Yang

    (Department of Materials and Production, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark)

  • Brian Vejrum Wæhrens

    (Department of Materials and Production, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark)

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the two competing conceptual models driving the relationships of external pressure, sustainable practices, and sustainability performance. The understanding of such relationships is important in enabling manufacturers to strategically manage external pressure and engage in sustainable transition. Using a sample of 202 plants from the Sixth International Manufacturing Strategy Survey (IMSS-VI), this research tests two hypotheses: (1) the role of sustainable practices in mediating the relationship between external pressure and environmental and social performance, and (2) the role of external pressure in moderating the link between sustainable practices and environmental and social performance. These hypotheses are tested through the hierarchical regression analysis and bootstrapping method. The findings show the mediating role of sustainable practices in the relationship between external pressure and environmental performance, suggesting a reactive approach to environmentally oriented sustainable practices adoption. Furthermore, the results show the moderating role of external pressure on the relationship between sustainable practices and social performance, indicating that plants take a proactive approach to the adoption of socially oriented sustainable practices for improving social performance of the buying firms, whereas there is no moderating effect for environmental performance. Studies addressing the relationships between external pressure, sustainable practices, and sustainability performance in the context of emerging economies (China and India) are limited, so there is a need to address these relationships in this context for generalisation. Studies that address the sustainability outcomes consisting of both environmental and social performance of the reactive and proactive approaches to sustainability initiatives in emerging economies are lacking. This research adds to the literature by investigating the sustainability outcomes of reactive and proactive methods in two emerging countries, China and India. The distinction between reactive and proactive approaches has important implications for sustainability performance in the context of emerging economies, as the rapid growth of these economies raises a number of sustainability issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Haleem Fazli & Sami Farooq & Cheng Yang & Brian Vejrum Wæhrens, 2023. "Proactive and Reactive Approaches towards Sustainable Practices in Manufacturing Companies: Emerging Economies Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:12796-:d:1223895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/12796/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/12796/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Govindarajan, V. & Gupta, Anil K., 1985. "Linking control systems to business unit strategy: impact on performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 51-66, January.
    2. Paolo Perego & Frank Hartmann, 2009. "Aligning Performance Measurement Systems With Strategy: The Case of Environmental Strategy," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 45(4), pages 397-428, December.
    3. Xiao, Chengyong & Wang, Qian & van Donk, Dirk Pieter & van der Vaart, Taco, 2018. "When are stakeholder pressures effective? An extension of slack resources theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 138-149.
    4. Virginia Munro & Denni Arli & Sharyn Rundle-Thiele, 2018. "CSR engagement and values in a pre-emerging and emerging country context," International Journal of Emerging Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(5), pages 1251-1272, November.
    5. Shubham & Parikshit Charan & L.S. Murty, 2018. "Secondary stakeholder pressures and organizational adoption of sustainable operations practices: The mediating role of primary stakeholders," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 910-923, November.
    6. Sarkis, Joseph, 1998. "Evaluating environmentally conscious business practices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 159-174, May.
    7. Jan Anton van Zanten & Rob van Tulder, 2018. "Multinational enterprises and the Sustainable Development Goals: An institutional approach to corporate engagement," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(3), pages 208-233, December.
    8. Nuttaneeya Torugsa & Wayne O’Donohue & Rob Hecker, 2013. "Proactive CSR: An Empirical Analysis of the Role of its Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions on the Association between Capabilities and Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(2), pages 383-402, June.
    9. Hong, Paul & Jagani, Sandeep & Kim, Jinhwan & Youn, Sun Hee, 2019. "Managing sustainability orientation: An empirical investigation of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 71-81.
    10. Dash, Ganesh & Paul, Justin, 2021. "CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    11. Azadegan, Arash & Golara, Sina & Kach, Andrew & Mousavi, Nasim, 2018. "Corporate environmental investments: A cross-national study on managerial decision making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 47-64.
    12. Matthias Ehrgott & Felix Reimann & Lutz Kaufmann & Craig Carter, 2011. "Social Sustainability in Selecting Emerging Economy Suppliers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 99-119, January.
    13. Baden, D.A. & Harwood, I.A. & Woodward, D.G., 2009. "The effect of buyer pressure on suppliers in SMEs to demonstrate CSR practices: An added incentive or counter productive?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 429-441, December.
    14. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & Ashutosh Patil, 2006. "Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1865-1883, December.
    15. Qinghua Zhu & Joseph Sarkis & Kee‐hung Lai & Yong Geng, 2008. "The role of organizational size in the adoption of green supply chain management practices in China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(6), pages 322-337, November.
    16. Julia Wolf, 2014. "The Relationship Between Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Stakeholder Pressure and Corporate Sustainability Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(3), pages 317-328, February.
    17. Fazli Haleem & Sami Farooq & Yang Cheng & Brian Vejrum Waehrens, 2022. "Sustainable Management Practices and Stakeholder Pressure: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fazli Haleem & Sami Farooq & Yang Cheng & Brian Vejrum Waehrens, 2022. "Sustainable Management Practices and Stakeholder Pressure: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Roy, Vivek & Silvestre, Bruno S. & Singh, Shubham, 2020. "Reactive and proactive pathways to sustainable apparel supply chains: Manufacturer's perspective on stakeholder salience and organizational learning toward responsible management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    3. Ran Tao & Jian Wu & Hong Zhao, 2023. "Do Corporate Customers Prefer Socially Responsible Suppliers? An Instrumental Stakeholder Theory Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 689-712, July.
    4. Luis E. Villegas & Andrés A. Acuña-Duarte & César A. Salazar, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Willingness to Eco-Innovate among Chilean Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Alamoudi, Hawazen & Shaikh, Aijaz A. & Alharthi, Majed & Dash, Ganesh, 2023. "With great power comes great responsibilities – Examining platform-based mechanisms and institutional trust in rideshare services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    6. Fahian Anisul Huq & Mark Stevenson, 2020. "Implementing Socially Sustainable Practices in Challenging Institutional Contexts: Building Theory from Seven Developing Country Supplier Cases," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 415-442, January.
    7. Sher Jahan Khan & Puneet Kaur & Fauzia Jabeen & Amandeep Dhir, 2021. "Green process innovation: Where we are and where we are going," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3273-3296, November.
    8. Donna Marshall & Lucy McCarthy & Marius Claudy & Paul McGrath, 2019. "Piggy in the Middle: How Direct Customer Power Affects First-Tier Suppliers’ Adoption of Socially Responsible Procurement Practices and Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(4), pages 1081-1102, February.
    9. Andrea Cardoni & Filippo Zanin & Giulio Corazza & Alessio Paradisi, 2020. "Knowledge Management and Performance Measurement Systems for SMEs’ Economic Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-27, March.
    10. Kai-Chong Thong & Wai-Peng Wong, 2018. "Pathways for Sustainable Supply Chain Performance—Evidence from a Developing Country, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, August.
    11. Woo, Donghyup & Suresh, Nallan C., 2022. "Voluntary agreements for sustainability, resource efficiency & firm performance under the supply chain cooperation policy in South Korea," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    12. Lartey, Theophilus A. & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Danso, Albert & Adomako, Samuel & Khan, Zaheer & Tarba, Shlomo Y., 2021. "Environmental sustainability practices and offshoring activities of multinational corporations across emerging and developed markets," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5).
    13. Jung Wan Lee & Young Min Kim & Young Ei Kim, 2018. "Antecedents of Adopting Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Green Practices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 397-409, March.
    14. Osama Meqdadi & Thomas Johnsen & Rhona Johnsen, 2012. "The Role of SME Suppliers in Implementing Sustainability," Post-Print hal-00824677, HAL.
    15. Szász, Levente & Csíki, Ottó & Rácz, Béla-Gergely, 2021. "Sustainability management in the global automotive industry: A theoretical model and survey study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    16. Jacob Hörisch & Matthew P. Johnson & Stefan Schaltegger, 2015. "Implementation of Sustainability Management and Company Size: A Knowledge‐Based View," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(8), pages 765-779, December.
    17. Shafiq, Asad & Ahmed, Muhammad Usman & Mahmoodi, Farzad, 2020. "Impact of supply chain analytics and customer pressure for ethical conduct on socially responsible practices and performance: An exploratory study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    18. Christoph Feichter & Isabella Grabner, 2020. "Empirische Forschung zu Management Control – Ein Überblick und neue Trends [Empirical Management Control Reserach—An Overview and Future Directions]," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 149-181, June.
    19. Amin Vafadarnikjoo & Hadi Badri Ahmadi & Benjamin Thomas Hazen & James J. H. Liou, 2020. "Understanding Interdependencies among Social Sustainability Evaluation Criteria in an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Ganesh Dash & Syed Akmal & Prashant Mehta & Debarun Chakraborty, 2022. "COVID-19 and E-Learning Adoption in Higher Education: A Multi-Group Analysis and Recommendation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:12796-:d:1223895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.