IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11374-d1199630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Sustainability on Psychological Ownership in Services Based on Temporary Access

Author

Listed:
  • Leonardo M. Raimundo

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Porto, 4099-464 Porto, Portugal)

  • João F. Proença

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Porto, 4099-464 Porto, Portugal
    ADVANCE/CSG—Advanced Research in Management (Research Center in Management Integrated at the CSG—Research Center in Social Sciences and Management), ISEG-Lisbon School of Economics and Management, University of Lisbon, 1200-078 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

The search for solutions that address the issues related to sustainability and overconsumption seeks to create social and ecological value while also creating economic value for companies. The sharing economy has emerged as a viable solution. Nonetheless, it also has side effects that need to be addressed, namely, the loss of perceived ownership. This study seeks to respond to the question, “What is the role of sustainability in the relationship between psychological ownership and its antecedents?” By addressing it, the outcome of our research expands the literature on psychological ownership by employing variables related to sustainability (self-perception as a sustainable consumer, community, and personal connection to the sustainable positioning of the company) as moderators between psychological ownership and its precedent variables. Our paper contributes to knowledge of access-based services and consumer goods that have, until this moment, been limitedly investigated. Drawing upon prior research results about psychological ownership and variables related to sustainability, we employed a scenario-based self-report and evaluated the variables’ moderating effect on psychological ownership. We used SEM and smartPLS software. Our findings demonstrate the moderating effect of the (1) degree of intermediation of the platform, especially in the (2) low-intermediation scenario, and the (3) communal connection stemming from the sustainable position of the company. This paper contributes to the literature regarding intermediation and company positioning as variables with potential use in studies of psychological ownership, services, and, mainly, sustainability. Additionally, presents managers and marketeers the means to prevent the loss of perceived ownership while providing ways to leverage the sharing economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonardo M. Raimundo & João F. Proença, 2023. "The Influence of Sustainability on Psychological Ownership in Services Based on Temporary Access," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-35, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11374-:d:1199630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11374/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11374/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raminta Pranckutė, 2021. "Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-59, March.
    2. Jennifer Aaker & Kathleen D. Vohs & Cassie Mogilner, 2010. "Nonprofits Are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes Matter," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 224-237, August.
    3. Colleen P Kirk & Joann Peck & Scott D Swain & Darren DahlEditor & Jennifer ArgoAssociate Editor, 2018. "Property Lines in the Mind: Consumers’ Psychological Ownership and Their Territorial Responses," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 45(1), pages 148-168.
    4. Arnold Tukker, 2004. "Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 246-260, July.
    5. Paola Andrea Morales & Sheb True & R. Keith Tudor, 2020. "Insights, challenges and recommendations for research on sustainability in marketing," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 394-406, October.
    6. McCracken, Grant, 1986. "Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movement of the Cultural Meaning of Consumer Goods," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(1), pages 71-84, June.
    7. Aric Rindfleisch & James E. Burroughs & Nancy Wong, 2009. "The Safety of Objects: Materialism, Existential Insecurity, and Brand Connection," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(1), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Jui-Che Tu & Chi-Ling Hu, 2018. "A Study on the Factors Affecting Consumers’ Willingness to Accept Clothing Rentals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-30, November.
    9. Aaker, Jennifer & Vohs, Kathleen D. & Mogilner, Cassie, 2010. "Non-profits Are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes Matter," Research Papers 2047, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    10. Lim, Weng Marc, 2020. "The sharing economy: A marketing perspective," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 4-13.
    11. Prashant Kumar & Bhimrao Ghodeswar, 2015. "Green Marketing Mix: A Review of Literature and Direction for Future Research," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global, vol. 6(3), pages 42-59, July.
    12. Yoon Yong Hwang & Gin Young Jo & Min Jung Oh, 2020. "The Persuasive Effect of Competence and Warmth on Clothing Sustainable Consumption: The Moderating Role of Consumer Knowledge and Social Embeddedness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Daniel Borg & Oksana Mont & Heather Schoonover, 2020. "Consumer Acceptance and Value in Use-Oriented Product-Service Systems: Lessons from Swedish Consumer Goods Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Jack H. Townsend & Vlad C. Coroama, 2018. "Digital Acceleration of Sustainability Transition: The Paradox of Push Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Russell W. Belk, 2013. "Extended Self in a Digital World," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(3), pages 477-500.
    16. Belk, Russell W, 1988. "Possessions and the Extended Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 139-168, September.
    17. Fleura Bardhi & Giana M. Eckhardt, 2012. "Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(4), pages 881-898.
    18. Liad Weiss & Gita V. Johar, 2013. "Egocentric Categorization and Product Judgment: Seeing Your Traits in What You Own (and Their Opposite in What You Don't)," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(1), pages 185-201.
    19. Noah J. Goldstein & Robert B. Cialdini & Vladas Griskevicius, 2008. "A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(3), pages 472-482, March.
    20. Belk, Russell, 2014. "You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1595-1600.
    21. Michael G. Luchs & Minu Kumar, 2017. "“Yes, but this Other One Looks Better/Works Better”: How do Consumers Respond to Trade-offs Between Sustainability and Other Valued Attributes?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 567-584, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiyoung Hwang, 2019. "Managing the innovation legitimacy of the sharing economy," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Sands, Sean & Ferraro, Carla & Campbell, Colin & Kietzmann, Jan & Andonopoulos, Vasiliki Vicki, 2020. "Who shares? Profiling consumers in the sharing economy," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 22-33.
    3. Paul Rogers, 2021. "Rented But MINE! Application of Psychological Ownership Theory to Access-Based Consumption and the Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    4. Anna Irena Szymańska, 2021. "The Importance of the Sharing Economy in Improving the Quality of Life and Social Integration of Local Communities on the Example of Virtual Groups," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Sabrina V. Helm & Victoria Ligon & Tony Stovall & Silvia Riper, 2018. "Consumer interpretations of digital ownership in the book market," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(2), pages 177-189, May.
    6. Bernritter, Stefan F. & Verlegh, Peeter W.J. & Smit, Edith G., 2016. "Why Nonprofits Are Easier to Endorse on Social Media: The Roles of Warmth and Brand Symbolism," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 27-42.
    7. Fritze, Martin P. & Benkenstein, Martin & Belk, Russell & Peck, Joann & Wirtz, Jochen & Claus, and Bart, 2021. "Commentaries on the Sharing Economy: Advancing New Perspectives," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 5(1), pages 3-19.
    8. Loussaïef, Leïla & Ulrich, Isabelle & Damay, Coralie, 2019. "How does access to luxury fashion challenge self-identity? Exploring women's practices of joint and non-ownership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 263-272.
    9. Sinclair, Gary & Tinson, Julie, 2017. "Psychological ownership and music streaming consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-9.
    10. Giovanna Magnani & Beatrice Re, 2020. "Lived experiences about car sharing in young adults: Emerging paradoxes," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2020(2), pages 207-229, September.
    11. Lindsay McCoy & Yuan-Ting Wang & Ting Chi, 2021. "Why Is Collaborative Apparel Consumption Gaining Popularity? An Empirical Study of US Gen Z Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Wei, Xiaoyong & Lo, Chris.K.Y. & Jung, Sojin & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "From co-consumption to co-production: A systematic review and research synthesis of collaborative consumption practices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 282-294.
    13. Fetscherin, Marc & Heinrich, Daniel, 2015. "Consumer brand relationships research: A bibliometric citation meta-analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 380-390.
    14. Giovanna Magnani & Beatrice Re, 0. "Lived experiences about car sharing in young adults: Emerging paradoxes," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    15. Geena Billows & Lisa McNeill, 2018. "Consumer Attitude and Behavioral Intention toward Collaborative Consumption of Shared Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, November.
    16. Leah Warfield Smith & Randall Lee Rose & Alex R. Zablah & Heath McCullough & Mohammad “Mike” Saljoughian, 2023. "Examining post-purchase consumer responses to product automation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 530-550, May.
    17. Lutz, Christoph & Newlands, Gemma, 2018. "Consumer segmentation within the sharing economy: The case of Airbnb," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 187-196.
    18. Catherine E. Cherry & Nick F. Pidgeon, 2018. "Why Is Ownership an Issue? Exploring Factors That Determine Public Acceptance of Product-Service Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    19. Mauro Capestro & Greta Chiavegato, 2023. "Il consumo dei beni di lusso nel contesto della sharing economy: un caso di studio italiano," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(1), pages 53-70.
    20. Kang, Jingoo & Kang, Minwook, 2022. "Durable goods as commitment devices under quasi-hyperbolic discounting," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11374-:d:1199630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.