IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11373-d1199613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Innovation-Based Human Development Index Using PROMETHEE II: The Context of G8 Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Weam Tunsi

    (College of Business Administration, University of Business and Technology, Jeddah 21448, Saudi Arabia)

  • Hisham Alidrisi

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The current Human Development Index (HDI) has a promising potential to consider further dimensions, the technological dimensions in specific, in order to absorb various innovational aspects whenever human development is to be benchmarked among countries. Hence, the innovation-based HDI was developed herein using one of the well-known Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques: the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations II (PROMETHEE II) considering a mixture of technological criteria, including the Global Innovation Index (GII) itself. The G8 countries, as leading countries worldwide, were investigated in this regard in order to attain such a benchmarking attempt. The model was formulated using seven criteria selected from the World Bank (WB) Open Data (such as High-technology exports as a percentage of manufactured exports, Research and development (R&D) expenditure as a percentage of GDP, and Trademark applications, …, etc.) along with the GII, for the purpose of conducting an MCDM-based evaluation model for the G8 countries. The results of the developed index affirm that the ranking of the G8 countries has distinctly been changed as a consequence of considering technological and innovational aspects, compared to the original HDI (i.e., USA +4—from 5th to 1st; Canada −4, from 2nd to 6th). By utilizing MCDM methods (including PROMETHEE II), this paper also affirms that an infinite number of indexes can be developed in the future by employing a huge number of WB indicators with respect to various MCDM approaches. Hence, international communities are in need of setting up commonly accepted guidelines in order to facilitate having a unified prioritization (i.e., unified preference) regarding the potential criteria and/or indicators to be considered globally for better sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Weam Tunsi & Hisham Alidrisi, 2023. "The Innovation-Based Human Development Index Using PROMETHEE II: The Context of G8 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11373-:d:1199613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11373/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11373/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesco Burchi & Chiara Gnesi, 2016. "A Review of the Literature on Well-Being in Italy: A Human Development Perspective," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2-3), pages 170-192, August.
    2. Daniel A. Salas & Paulina Criollo & Angel D. Ramirez, 2021. "The Role of Higher Education Institutions in the Implementation of Circular Economy in Latin America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-27, August.
    3. Nazli Goker & E. Ertugrul Karsak & Mehtap Dursun, 2022. "An Integrated QFD and Common Weight DEA-Based Fuzzy MCDM Framework for Performance Ranking of Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 409-430, January.
    4. Michele Capriati, 2022. "Capabilities, Innovation and Economic Growth in EU Regions," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 373-399, July.
    5. Assa, Jacob, 2021. "Less is more: The implicit sustainability content of the human development index," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    6. Raquel Lourenço Carvalhal Monteiro & Valdecy Pereira & Helder Gomes Costa, 2018. "A Multicriteria Approach to the Human Development Index Classification," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(2), pages 417-438, April.
    7. Behzadian, Majid & Kazemzadeh, R.B. & Albadvi, A. & Aghdasi, M., 2010. "PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 198-215, January.
    8. Xiangfei Ma & Inna Gryshova & Viktoriia Khaustova & Olena Reshetnyak & Maryna Shcherbata & Denys Bobrovnyk & Mykyta Khaustov, 2022. "Assessment of the Impact of Scientific and Technical Activities on the Economic Growth of World Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-35, November.
    9. Onoda, Takao, 2009. "IEA policies--G8 recommendations and an afterwards," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 3823-3831, October.
    10. Doumpos, Michael & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2004. "A multicriteria classification approach based on pairwise comparisons," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 378-389, October.
    11. Opoku, Eric Evans Osei & Dogah, Kingsley E. & Aluko, Olufemi Adewale, 2022. "The contribution of human development towards environmental sustainability," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    12. Aleksandras Krylovas & Natalja Kosareva & Stanislav Dadelo, 2020. "European Countries Ranking and Clustering Solution by Children’s Physical Activity and Human Development Index Using Entropy-Based Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-22, October.
    13. José PINEDA, 2012. "Sustainability And Human Development: A Proposal For A Sustainability Adjusted Human Development Index," Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields, ASERS Publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 71-98.
    14. Pineda, Jose, 2012. "Sustainability and human development: a proposal for a sustainability adjusted HDI (SHDI)," MPRA Paper 39656, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Ignazio Visco, 2020. "Economic growth and productivity: Italy and the role of knowledge," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 73(294), pages 205-224.
    16. repec:srs:journl:tpref:v:3:y:2012:i:2:p:71-98 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. S. N. Bobylev & S. V. Solovyeva, 2017. "Sustainable development goals for the future of Russia," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 259-265, May.
    18. Fábio de Oliveira Paula & Jorge Ferreira da Silva, 2021. "R&D spending and patents: levers of national development," Innovation & Management Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 175-191, May.
    19. Maksim Belitski & Rosa Caiazza & Yuliya Rodionova, 2020. "Investment in training and skills for innovation in entrepreneurial start-ups and incumbents: evidence from the United Kingdom," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 617-640, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Comim, Flavio & Hirai, Tadashi, 2022. "Sustainability and Human Development Indicators: A Poset Analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    2. Yongfu Huang & Muhammad G. Quibria, 2015. "The global partnership for sustainable development," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 0(3-4), pages 157-174, August.
    3. Doumpos, Michael & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2011. "Preference disaggregation and statistical learning for multicriteria decision support: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(3), pages 203-214, March.
    4. Anna Martyka & Dorota Jopek & Izabela Skrzypczak, 2022. "Analysis of the Sustainable Development Index in the Communes of the Podkarpackie Voivodeship: A Polish Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    5. Sue Ling Lai & Du-Nin Chen, 2020. "A Research on the Relationship between Environmental Sustainability Management and Human Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Jingjing He & Yongfu Huang & Finn Tarp, 2014. "Has the Clean Development Mechanism assisted sustainable development?," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 38(4), pages 248-260, November.
    7. Yongfu Huang & Muhammad G. Quibria, 2015. "The global partnership for sustainable development," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 39(3-4), pages 157-174, August.
    8. Bilbao-Terol, Amelia & Arenas-Parra, Mar & Cañal-Fernández, Verónica & Antomil-Ibias, José, 2014. "Using TOPSIS for assessing the sustainability of government bond funds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-17.
    9. Ya-Ju Chang & Laura Schneider & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2015. "Assessing Child Development: A Critical Review and the Sustainable Child Development Index (SCDI)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Assa, Jacob, 2021. "Less is more: The implicit sustainability content of the human development index," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    11. Herrero, Carmen & Pineda, José & Villar, Antonio & Zambrano, Eduardo, 2020. "Tracking progress towards accessible, green and efficient energy: The Inclusive Green Energy index," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    12. Tsuen-Ho Hsu & Ling-Zhong Lin, 2014. "Using Fuzzy Preference Method for Group Package Tour Based on the Risk Perception," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 299-323, March.
    13. Fu-Ling Cai & Xiuwu Liao & Kan-Liang Wang, 2012. "An interactive sorting approach based on the assignment examples of multiple decision makers with different priorities," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 87-108, August.
    14. Ya-Ju Chang & Annekatrin Lehmann & Lisa Winter & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2018. "Application Options of the Sustainable Child Development Index (SCDI)—Assessing the Status of Sustainable Development and Establishing Social Impact Pathways," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, July.
    15. Chrysovalantis Gaganis & Panagiota Papadimitri & Menelaos Tasiou, 2021. "A multicriteria decision support tool for modelling bank credit ratings," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 306(1), pages 27-56, November.
    16. Carmen Herrero & Jose' Pineda & Antonio Villar & Eduardo Zambrano, 2020. "The Inclusive Green Energy index of progress," Working Papers 2003, California Polytechnic State University, Department of Economics.
    17. Marwa Hannouf & Getachew Assefa, 2018. "A Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment-Based Decision-Analysis Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, October.
    18. Corrente, Salvatore & Figueira, José Rui & Greco, Salvatore, 2014. "The SMAA-PROMETHEE method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 514-522.
    19. Doumpos, M. & Marinakis, Y. & Marinaki, M. & Zopounidis, C., 2009. "An evolutionary approach to construction of outranking models for multicriteria classification: The case of the ELECTRE TRI method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 496-505, December.
    20. Zhang, Tianyu & Dong, Peiwu & Zeng, Yongchao & Ju, Yanbing, 2022. "Analyzing the diffusion of competitive smart wearable devices: An agent-based multi-dimensional relative agreement model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 90-105.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11373-:d:1199613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.