IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11071-d1194709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Redefining Food Sources: Exploring the Disconnect between Goat Farming and Its Perceived Sustainability—A Case Study in Chitima, Mozambique

Author

Listed:
  • Martín del Valle M

    (Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agronomy and Forest Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile
    Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Systems, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK)

  • Roberto Hernández

    (Department of Environmental Sciences and Renewable Natural Resources, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8820808, Chile)

  • Lisa Boden

    (Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Systems, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK)

  • José Luis Riveros

    (Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agronomy and Forest Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the disconnect between goat farming and its perception as a food source and determine if this is related to the way farmers value goats. We conducted a questionnaire of 1 open and 15 closed questions among ( n = 23) goat producers in Bairro Boroma, Province of Tete, Mozambique, and six in-depth interviews with stakeholders of the local goat meat trading chain. The results show that goats have an economic value more than a nutritional value, meaning they preferred trading them instead of allocating them for their own consumption. Conformation and size characteristics were more relevant when buying/selling an animal. All goat producers sold live animals in their household’s backyard, at an average price of USD 19.3 ± 4.6/per animal with an average weight of 20.23 ± 3.41 kg. Finally, goat producers preferred to increase their number of goats rather than cattle due to the ease of husbandry, amount of meat obtained from the carcass and reduced risk of meat spoilage post-slaughter because of their smaller size. The latter is essential within an environment lacking access to drinkable water and electric energy to support cold chain management in meat storage.

Suggested Citation

  • Martín del Valle M & Roberto Hernández & Lisa Boden & José Luis Riveros, 2023. "Redefining Food Sources: Exploring the Disconnect between Goat Farming and Its Perceived Sustainability—A Case Study in Chitima, Mozambique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-9, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11071-:d:1194709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11071/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11071/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jared Diamond, 2002. "Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication," Nature, Nature, vol. 418(6898), pages 700-707, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Serge Svizzero & Clem Tisdell, 2014. "Theories About the Commencement of Agriculture in Prehistoric Societies: A Critical Evaluation," Rivista di storia economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 255-280.
    2. GianCarlo Moschini, 2008. "Biotechnology and the development of food markets: retrospect and prospects," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 35(3), pages 331-355, September.
    3. repec:idb:brikps:64718 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Mathieu Gautier & Denis Laloë & Katayoun Moazami-Goudarzi, 2010. "Insights into the Genetic History of French Cattle from Dense SNP Data on 47 Worldwide Breeds," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-11, September.
    5. Muhly, Tyler B. & Musiani, Marco, 2009. "Livestock depredation by wolves and the ranching economy in the Northwestern U.S," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(8-9), pages 2439-2450, June.
    6. Liverani, Marco & Waage, Jeff & Barnett, Tony & Pfeiffer, Dirk U. & Rushton, Jonathan & Rudge, James W. & Loevinsohn, Michael E. & Scoones, Ian & Smith, Richard D. & Cooper, Ben S. & White, Lisa J. & , 2013. "Understanding and managing zoonotic risk in the new livestock industries," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 50665, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Jordan Palli & Michele Baliva & Franco Biondi & Lucio Calcagnile & Domenico Cerbino & Marisa D’Elia & Rosario Muleo & Aldo Schettino & Gianluca Quarta & Nicola Sassone & Francesco Solano & Pietro Zien, 2023. "The Longevity of Fruit Trees in Basilicata (Southern Italy): Implications for Agricultural Biodiversity Conservation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Nunn, Nathan, 2014. "Historical Development," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 7, pages 347-402, Elsevier.
    9. Vahabi,Mehrdad, 2019. "The Political Economy of Predation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107591370.
    10. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & OC Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2020. "Marketing’s theoretical and conceptual value proposition: opportunities to address marketing’s influence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 151-167, December.
    11. Seyed Morteza Vaghar Seyedin & Amir Zeidi & Elham Chamanehpour & Mohammad Hassan Fathi Nasri & Einar Vargas-Bello-Pérez, 2022. "Methane Emission: Strategies to Reduce Global Warming in Relation to Animal Husbandry Units with Emphasis on Ruminants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Ying Bai & James Kai-sing Kung, 2022. "Surname distance and technology diffusion: the case of the adoption of maize in late imperial China," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 569-607, December.
    13. Simone Mozzachiodi & Kristoffer Krogerus & Brian Gibson & Alain Nicolas & Gianni Liti, 2022. "Unlocking the functional potential of polyploid yeasts," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Robert M. Chiles & Amy J. Fitzgerald, 2018. "Why is meat so important in Western history and culture? A genealogical critique of biophysical and political-economic explanations," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 35(1), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Hueting, Roefie & Reijnders, Lucas, 2004. "Broad sustainability contra sustainability: the proper construction of sustainability indicators," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3-4), pages 249-260, October.
    16. Margherita Bottero & Björn Wallace, 2013. "Is There a Long-Term Effect of Africa's Slave Trades?," Quaderni di storia economica (Economic History Working Papers) 30, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    17. Sizhe Yang & Xiaoru Sun & Li Jin & Menghan Zhang, 2024. "Inferring language dispersal patterns with velocity field estimation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Delis, Manthos D. & Dioikitopoulos, Evangelos V. & Ongena, Steven, 2023. "Population diversity and financial risk-taking," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    19. Jan Beck & Andrea Sieber, 2010. "Is the Spatial Distribution of Mankind's Most Basic Economic Traits Determined by Climate and Soil Alone?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-10, May.
    20. Iannotti, Lora & Cunningham, Kenda & Ruel, Marie, 2009. "Improving diet quality and micronutrient nutrition: Homestead food production in Bangladesh," IFPRI discussion papers 928, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    21. Bertrand Valiorgue & Emilie Bourlier-Bargues & Kevin Metz, 2020. "Varieties and externalities of biosocial organizations in the Anthropocene, a boundary-work perspective," Post-Print hal-03041014, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11071-:d:1194709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.