IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9224-d1165774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Adoption and Use of Smart Assistants in Residential Homes: The Matching Hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Nathanael Johnson

    (Communication and Cognition Lab, Brian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University, 100 North University Street, Beering Hall Room 2114, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

  • Torsten Reimer

    (Communication and Cognition Lab, Brian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University, 100 North University Street, Beering Hall Room 2114, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

Abstract

An increasing number of residential homes are equipped with smart assistants such as Cortana, Alexa, and Siri. Adoption rates and the frequency of the usage of smart assistants vary across users and residential homes. Building on the theory of uses and gratifications (UGT) and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2 (UTAUT2), the objective of this paper was to examine whether the intended use of a digital assistant would moderate the effects of performance expectancy and hedonic motivation on its adoption. Two experiments ( N = 345 and N = 351) tested the hypothesis that, for utilitarian purposes, devices with high performance appraisal are preferred, whereas for entertainment purposes, devices with high hedonic appraisal are preferred. The experiments manipulated the performance expectancy and hedonic motivation towards several digital assistants by varying how the assistants were introduced. Participants were asked which assistant they would choose for a variety of utilitarian and entertainment purposes. As expected, the experiments supported the proposed matching hypothesis, revealing that the devices that were high in performance appraisal were preferred for utilitarian tasks, whereas the devices high in hedonic appraisal were preferred for entertainment needs. These results suggest that a device’s introduction can change people’s perceptions of the device and subsequently their decision to use it.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathanael Johnson & Torsten Reimer, 2023. "The Adoption and Use of Smart Assistants in Residential Homes: The Matching Hypothesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9224-:d:1165774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9224/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9224/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Syed Sardar Muhammad & Bidit Lal Dey & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2018. "Analysis of Factors that Influence Customers’ Willingness to Leave Big Data Digital Footprints on Social Media: A Systematic Review of Literature," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 559-576, June.
    2. Joshua Olusegun Fayomi & Zainab Abdulqadir Sani, 2023. "Application and Challenges of Web 3.0 in Smart Cities," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, vol. 7(1), pages 31-42, March.
    3. Ray, Arghya & Dhir, Amandeep & Bala, Pradip Kumar & Kaur, Puneet, 2019. "Why do people use food delivery apps (FDA)? A uses and gratification theory perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 221-230.
    4. Phasiri Manutworakit & Kasem Choocharukul, 2022. "Factors Influencing Battery Electric Vehicle Adoption in Thailand—Expanding the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology’s Variables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    6. Abd-elmegeid Amin Ali & Mohamed Mashhour & Ahmed S. Salama & Rasha Shoitan & Hassan Shaban, 2023. "Development of an Intelligent Personal Assistant System Based on IoT for People with Disabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Nicole Koenig-Lewis & Morgan Marquet & Adrian Palmer & Anita Lifen Zhao, 2015. "Enjoyment and social influence: predicting mobile payment adoption," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 537-554, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Torsten Reimer & Jeonghyun Oh & Juan Pablo Loaiza-Ramírez & Hayden Barber, 2024. "Thermostat Anchors: Do Temperature Scale Characteristics Affect the Selection of Temperature Setpoints for Residential Homes?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Hayden Barber & Torsten Reimer & Damin Zhang & Julia Rayz, 2024. "Is Alexa Happy or Angry? Perceptions and Attributions of Emotional Displays of Smart Technologies in Residential Homes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivonne Angelica Castiblanco Jimenez & Laura Cristina Cepeda García & Maria Grazia Violante & Federica Marcolin & Enrico Vezzetti, 2020. "Commonly Used External TAM Variables in e-Learning, Agriculture and Virtual Reality Applications," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Salvador Angosto & Jerónimo García-Fernández & Moisés Grimaldi-Puyana, 2023. "A systematic review of intention to use fitness apps (2020–2023)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Robert Jeyakumar Nathan & Vijay Victor & Melanie Tan & Maria Fekete-Farkas, 0. "Tourists’ use of Airbnb app for visiting a historical city," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-26.
    4. Kapser, Sebastian & Abdelrahman, Mahmoud & Bernecker, Tobias, 2021. "Autonomous delivery vehicles to fight the spread of Covid-19 – How do men and women differ in their acceptance?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 183-198.
    5. Hailiang Wang & Jiaxin Zhang & Yan Luximon & Mingfu Qin & Ping Geng & Da Tao, 2022. "The Determinants of User Acceptance of Mobile Medical Platforms: An Investigation Integrating the TPB, TAM, and Patient-Centered Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Shelly Gupta & Sanjay Dhingra, 2022. "Modeling the key factors influencing the adoption of mobile financial services: an interpretive structural modeling approach," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 96-110, June.
    7. Lara Stocchi & Naser Pourazad & Nina Michaelidou & Arry Tanusondjaja & Paul Harrigan, 2022. "Marketing research on Mobile apps: past, present and future," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 195-225, March.
    8. Kuttimani Tamilmani & Nripendra P. Rana & Robin Nunkoo & Vishnupriya Raghavan & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2022. "Indian Travellers’ Adoption of Airbnb Platform," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 77-96, February.
    9. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & Sebastián Molinillo & Elena Higueras-Castillo, 2022. "Do biometric payment systems work during the COVID-19 pandemic? Insights from the Spanish users' viewpoint," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, December.
    10. Robert Jeyakumar Nathan & Vijay Victor & Melanie Tan & Maria Fekete-Farkas, 2020. "Tourists’ use of Airbnb app for visiting a historical city," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 217-242, June.
    11. de Luna, Iviane Ramos & Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Sánchez-Fernández, Juan & Muñoz-Leiva, Francisco, 2019. "Mobile payment is not all the same: The adoption of mobile payment systems depending on the technology applied," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 931-944.
    12. Maduku, Daniel K. & Thusi, Philile, 2023. "Understanding consumers' mobile shopping continuance intention: New perspectives from South Africa," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    13. Wong Foong Yee & Siew Imm Ng & Kaixin Seng & Xin-Jean Lim & Thanuja Rathakrishnan, 2022. "How does social media marketing enhance brand loyalty? Identifying mediators relevant to the cinema context," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(2), pages 114-130, June.
    14. Yeo, Sook Fern & Tan, Cheng Ling & Teo, Shen Long & Tan, Kim Hua, 2021. "The role of food apps servitization on repurchase intention: A study of FoodPanda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    15. Sabakun Naher Shetu & Md. Muzahidul Islam & Sadia Islam Promi, 2022. "An Empirical Investigation of the Continued Usage Intention of Digital Wallets: The Moderating Role of Perceived Technological Innovativeness," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Zaki Irfan Al Hafizh & Anas Hidayat, 2022. "The role of digital payment benefits toward switching consumer behavior in the case of OVO application," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(7), pages 23-34, October.
    17. Zhunzhun Liu & Shenglin Ben & Ruidong Zhang, 2019. "Factors affecting consumers’ mobile payment behavior: a meta-analysis," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 575-601, September.
    18. Schmidthuber, Lisa & Maresch, Daniela & Ginner, Michael, 2020. "Disruptive technologies and abundance in the service sector - toward a refined technology acceptance model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    19. Tandon, Anushree & Kaur, Puneet & Bhatt, Yogesh & Mäntymäki, Matti & Dhir, Amandeep, 2021. "Why do people purchase from food delivery apps? A consumer value perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    20. Teng Yu & Yajun Zhang & Ai Ping Teoh & Anchao Wang & Chengliang Wang, 2023. "Factors Influencing University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use Electric Car-Sharing Services in Guangzhou, China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9224-:d:1165774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.