IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8857-d1160403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Signs of Use Present a Barrier to Reusable Packaging Systems for Takeaway Food

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Collis

    (Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2DB, UK)

  • Weston Baxter

    (Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2DB, UK)

  • Harriet M. Baird

    (Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 2LT, UK)

  • Keelan Meade

    (Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 2LT, UK)

  • Thomas L. Webb

    (Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 2LT, UK)

Abstract

Single-use packaging is one of the biggest contributors to plastic waste, and reuse has been identified as a key strategy to reduce such waste. However, reusable containers typically become worn, which may influence how consumers think and feel about reuse. The present research explored whether and how evaluations of a takeaway food service changed depending on the appearance of a reusable container. Two studies were conducted (using opportunity sampling) to (i) investigate the effects that signs of use have on people’s perceptions of reusable packaging systems using quantitative methods (Study 1) and (ii) understand the rationale underpinning these evaluations using qualitative methods (Study 2). Study 1 involved an online questionnaire where participants ( n = 292) were shown images of reusable bowls for takeaway food with various levels of staining and asked to evaluate the container and the restaurant serving the food using rating scales. Study 2 involved in-person interviews where participants ( n = 22) were given the opportunity to inspect either a clean bowl or a stained bowl and then were asked questions about the bowls. Signs of previous use seemed to undermine people’s willingness to reuse containers in the future and were associated with more negative evaluations of the packaging, product, and restaurant serving the food. These findings provide insights into the factors that affect people’s willingness to engage with reusable packaging systems, and we use these findings to suggest behavioural and design interventions that might mitigate negative evaluations and encourage reuse.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Collis & Weston Baxter & Harriet M. Baird & Keelan Meade & Thomas L. Webb, 2023. "Signs of Use Present a Barrier to Reusable Packaging Systems for Takeaway Food," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8857-:d:1160403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8857/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8857/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabrizio Di Muro & Theodore J. Noseworthy, 2013. "Money Isn't Everything, but It Helps If It Doesn't Look Used: How the Physical Appearance of Money Influences Spending," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(6), pages 1330-1342.
    2. Weston Baxter & Marco Aurisicchio & Peter Childs, 2017. "Contaminated Interaction: Another Barrier to Circular Material Flows," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(3), pages 507-516, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meghann Matthews & Thomas L. Webb, 2023. "Understanding Consumer’s Willingness to Engage with Digital Reuse Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Sophie L. Pott & Harriet M. Baird & Saima Eman & Anda-Bianca Ciocirlan & Katie Foster & Georgia Green & Magdalena Grobien & Thomas L. Webb, 2024. "Does Providing Information about Cleaning Increase People’s Willingness to (Re)Use Bowls That Show Signs of Previous Use?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Graziela Darla Araujo Galvão & Steve Evans & Paulo Sergio Scoleze Ferrer & Marly Monteiro de Carvalho, 2022. "Circular business model: Breaking down barriers towards sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1504-1524, May.
    2. Reinol Josef Compañero & Andreas Feldmann & Peter Samuelsson & Anders Tilliander & Pär Göran Jönsson & Rutger Gyllenram, 2023. "Appraising the value of compositional information and its implications to scrap-based production of steel," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 36(3), pages 463-480, September.
    3. Żaneta Muranko & Catriona Tassell & Anouk Zeeuw van der Laan & Marco Aurisicchio, 2021. "Characterisation and Environmental Value Proposition of Reuse Models for Fast-Moving Consumer Goods: Reusable Packaging and Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-35, March.
    4. Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica & Stangherlin, Isadora Do Carmo, 2021. "Upcycled by-product use in agri-food systems from a consumer perspective: A review of what we know, and what is missing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Hervé Corvellec & Alison F. Stowell & Nils Johansson, 2022. "Critiques of the circular economy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 421-432, April.
    6. Florian Lüdeke‐Freund & Stefan Gold & Nancy M. P. Bocken, 2019. "A Review and Typology of Circular Economy Business Model Patterns," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 36-61, February.
    7. Erik G. Hansen & Ferdinand Revellio, 2020. "Circular value creation architectures: Make, ally, buy, or laissez‐faire," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(6), pages 1250-1273, December.
    8. Christopher Kennedy & Reid Lifset, 2018. "Winners of the 2017 Graedel Prizes: The Journal of Industrial Ecology Best Paper Prizes," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 997-999, October.
    9. Paul Rogers, 2021. "Rented But MINE! Application of Psychological Ownership Theory to Access-Based Consumption and the Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    10. Nicole Koschate-Fischer & Katharina Wüllner, 2017. "New developments in behavioral pricing research," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(6), pages 809-875, August.
    11. Cristina Calvo-Porral & Jean-Pierre Lévy-Mangin, 2020. "The Circular Economy Business Model: Examining Consumers’ Acceptance of Recycled Goods," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Li, Yi & Pandelaere, Mario, 2021. "The denomination–spending matching effect," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 338-349.
    13. Marjolaine Bezançon & Denis Guiot & Emmanuelle Le Nagard, 2019. "Le rôle de la contagion physique négative dans l'achat d'un produit d'occasion vendu en ligne," Post-Print halshs-01957512, HAL.
    14. Erik G. Hansen & Julia C. Schmitt, 2021. "Orchestrating cradle‐to‐cradle innovation across the value chain: Overcoming barriers through innovation communities, collaboration mechanisms, and intermediation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(3), pages 627-647, June.
    15. Wang, Lili & Kim, Sara & Zhou, Xinyue, 2023. "Money in a “Safe” place: Money anthropomorphism increases saving behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 88-108.
    16. Elena Dieckmann & Leila Sheldrick & Mike Tennant & Rupert Myers & Christopher Cheeseman, 2020. "Analysis of Barriers to Transitioning from a Linear to a Circular Economy for End of Life Materials: A Case Study for Waste Feathers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, February.
    17. Lucy Chamberlin & Casper Boks, 2018. "Marketing Approaches for a Circular Economy: Using Design Frameworks to Interpret Online Communications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-27, June.
    18. Ardelet, Caroline & Fleck, Nathalie & Grobert, Julien, 2022. "When a clean scent soothes the soul: Developing a positive attitude toward sharing service space with strangers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    19. Thomas Wastling & Fiona Charnley & Mariale Moreno, 2018. "Design for Circular Behaviour: Considering Users in a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, May.
    20. Juana Camacho-Otero & Casper Boks & Ida Nilstad Pettersen, 2018. "Consumption in the Circular Economy: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8857-:d:1160403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.