IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p7905-d1144902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Construction of Critical Factors for Successfully Introducing Chatbots into Mental Health Services in the Army: Using a Hybrid MCDM Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ming-Ching Hsu

    (Department of Education, University of Taipei, Taipei 100234, Taiwan
    Military Common Curriculum Center, National Defense University, Taoyuan 334301, Taiwan)

Abstract

Previous research has shown that although military personnel are at high risk of developing mental disorders because of the excessive stress caused by their work, they also display low levels of intention to seek assistance because of the military culture. This, in turn, creates exorbitant costs for their respective countries. With the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI)-related digital technologies, chatbots have been successfully applied to mental health services. Although the introduction of chatbots into the military to assist with mental health services is not common, it may become a future trend. This study aims to construct the critical factors for introducing chatbots into mental health services in the military, the relationships between the effects, and a weighting system, to ensure that the introduction of chatbots complies with sustainable practices. This includes four stages. In the initial stage, in accordance with the AI-readiness framework, in combination with the findings of previous research and specialist recommendations, preliminary indicators and items were developed. In the second stage, Fuzzy Delphi was used to confirm each dimension and indicator. In the third stage, using DEMATEL, an influential-network-relation map (INRM) of dimensions and indicators was created. In the fourth stage, using DANP, the relationships between the effects of the indicators and the weighting system were established. The findings of this study indicated that: (1) the key to success includes four dimensions and twenty-one indicators; (2) there is an interdependent relationship between the four dimensions and twenty-one indicators, and they influence each other; and (3) the four dimensions are technologies, goals, boundaries, and activities, in order of importance. Finally, specific suggestions are put forward to provide references for future practical applications and research, drawing on the results of this research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ming-Ching Hsu, 2023. "The Construction of Critical Factors for Successfully Introducing Chatbots into Mental Health Services in the Army: Using a Hybrid MCDM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7905-:d:1144902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7905/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7905/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davenport, Thomas H., 2018. "The AI Advantage: How to Put the Artificial Intelligence Revolution to Work," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262039176, December.
    2. Kuan-Wei Huang & Jen-Hung Huang & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2016. "New Hybrid Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Model for Improving Competence Sets: Enhancing a Company’s Core Competitiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Dominik Siemon & Rangina Ahmad & Henrik Harms & Triparna de Vreede, 2022. "Requirements and Solution Approaches to Personality-Adaptive Conversational Agents in Mental Health Care," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Seal, K.H. & Metzler, T.J. & Gima, K.S. & Bertenthal, D. & Maguen, S. & Marmar, C.R., 2009. "Trends and risk factors for mental health diagnoses among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans using department of Veterans Affairs Health Care, 2002-2008," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(9), pages 1651-1658.
    5. Iuan-Yuan Lu & Tsuanq Kuo & Ting-Syuan Lin & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Shan-Lin Huang, 2016. "Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Develop Effective Sustainable Development Strategies for Enhancing Competitive Advantages: Case of the TFT-LCD Industry in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-31, July.
    6. Hong Chen & Ling Li & Yong Chen, 2021. "Explore success factors that impact artificial intelligence adoption on telecom industry in China," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 36-68, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Srđan Dimić & Dragan Pamučar & Srđan Ljubojević & Boban Đorović, 2016. "Strategic Transport Management Models—The Case Study of an Oil Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-27, September.
    2. Bo-Wei Zhu & Jia-Rui Zhang & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Shan-Lin Huang & Lei Xiong, 2017. "Public Open Space Development for Elderly People by Using the DANP-V Model to Establish Continuous Improvement Strategies towards a Sustainable and Healthy Aging Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Yupeng Liu & Yutao Yang & Yue Liu & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2019. "Improving Sustainable Mobile Health Care Promotion: A Novel Hybrid MCDM Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-29, January.
    4. Vicent Penadés-Plà & Tatiana García-Segura & José V. Martí & Víctor Yepes, 2016. "A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods Applied to the Sustainable Bridge Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Shrutika Mishra & A. R. Tripathi, 2021. "AI business model: an integrative business approach," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Kuang-Hua Hu & Wei Jianguo & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2017. "Risk Factor Assessment Improvement for China’s Cloud Computing Auditing Using a New Hybrid MADM Model," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(03), pages 737-777, May.
    7. Randall Nedegaard & Jana Zwilling, 2017. "Promoting Military Cultural Competence among Civilian Care Providers: Learning through Program Development," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, February.
    8. Kuang-Hua Hu & Fu-Hsiang Chen & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2016. "Evaluating the Improvement of Sustainability of Sports Industry Policy Based on MADM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Eneja Sila & Klemen Širok, 2018. "The Importance of Employee Satisfaction: A Case Study of a Transportation and Logistics Service Company," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 13(2), pages 111-136.
    10. Mehran Farzadmehr & Valentin Carlan & Thierry Vanelslander, 2023. "Contemporary challenges and AI solutions in port operations: applying Gale–Shapley algorithm to find best matches," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-44, December.
    11. Eryarsoy, Enes & Kilic, Huseyin Selcuk & Zaim, Selim & Doszhanova, Marzhan, 2022. "Assessing IoT challenges in supply chain: A comparative study before and during- COVID-19 using interval valued neutrosophic analytical hierarchy process," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 108-123.
    12. Shuo Tian & Hangeng Zhao & Xiaobo Xu & Rongchao Mu & Qiang Ma, 2022. "Knowledge chain integration of design structure matrix‐based project team: An integration model," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 462-473, May.
    13. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Güleryüz, Sezin, 2016. "An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 435-448.
    14. Chi-Yo Huang & Pei-Han Chung & Joseph Z. Shyu & Yao-Hua Ho & Chao-Hsin Wu & Ming-Che Lee & Ming-Jenn Wu, 2018. "Evaluation and Selection of Materials for Particulate Matter MEMS Sensors by Using Hybrid MCDM Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-35, September.
    15. Nicholas J. Beutell & Marianne M. O’Hare & Joy A. Schneer & Jeffrey W. Alstete, 2017. "Coping with Fear of and Exposure to Terrorism among Expatriates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, July.
    16. Jing Yi Yong & Mohd Yusoff Yusliza & Thurasamy Ramayah & Bruno Michel Roman Pais Seles, 2022. "Testing the stakeholder pressure, relative advantage, top management commitment and green human resource management linkage," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1283-1299, September.
    17. Amy H. I. Lee & He-Yau Kang & You-Jyun Liou, 2017. "A Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Photovoltaic Solar Plant Location Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Jian Wang & Jin-Chun Huang & Shan-Lin Huang & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Ting Zhu, 2021. "Improvement Path for Resource-Constrained Cities Identified Using an Environmental Co-Governance Assessment Framework Based on BWM-mV Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-30, May.
    19. Iuan-Yuan Lu & Tsuanq Kuo & Ting-Syuan Lin & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Shan-Lin Huang, 2016. "Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Develop Effective Sustainable Development Strategies for Enhancing Competitive Advantages: Case of the TFT-LCD Industry in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-31, July.
    20. Shu-Kung Hu & James J. H. Liou & Ming-Tsang Lu & Yen-Ching Chuang & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2018. "Improving NFC Technology Promotion for Creating the Sustainable Education Environment by Using a Hybrid Modified MADM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7905-:d:1144902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.