IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p408-d1016041.html

Urban Forest Visit Motivation Scale: Development and Validation

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Lee

    (Master of Tourism (Tourism, Event, and Convention Management), Kyonggi University, Seoul 03746, Republic of Korea)

  • Dong-Han Kim

    (Department of Convention and Hotel Management, College of Economics and Business Administration, Hannam University, Daejeon 34430, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Due to the importance of the positive effects of urban forests on urban dwellers and the limitations of prior studies, which have mainly dealt with motivations involving rural or tourism-oriented forests, this study aims to develop a scale of visit motivation for an urban forest specifically as a way to deal with more diverse and specific motivations. The first step is to develop a draft version of the Urban Forest Visit Motivation Scale (UFVMS) through experts’ discussions of important factors from prior studies and the analysis of Big Data. Then, to confirm the reliability and validity of these items, 878 valid data of visitors of urban forests living in Seoul and Incheon were collected to conduct EFA and CFA to validate the final version of the scale. As a result of factor analysis, seven dimensions (Experience Activities, Healing and Rest, Health, Environmental Experience, Daily Leisure, Family, Eco-Friendly) with 24 items for the UFVMS were drawn after deleting 5 items that had a low standard regression weight on CFA or were unsuitable for the characteristics of a dimension. The results of this study are expected to provide academic and practical implications for urban forest visit motivation. In particular, unlike common purposes such as healing and health, the results indicate that the purpose of daily leisure-related activities is a notable factor of visiting urban forests, showing that there is also a high need for good-quality facilities such as food suppliers, toilets, and so on. This study will contribute to the academic development of research on UFVMS and the practical development for managers of urban forests in terms of planning a better management of the urban forest with a full understanding of visitors’ motivations. This improving management will contribute to the development of the social sustainability of urban citizens while giving various benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Lee & Dong-Han Kim, 2022. "Urban Forest Visit Motivation Scale: Development and Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:408-:d:1016041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/408/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/408/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katherine N. Irvine & Sara L. Warber & Patrick Devine-Wright & Kevin J. Gaston, 2013. "Understanding Urban Green Space as a Health Resource: A Qualitative Comparison of Visit Motivation and Derived Effects among Park Users in Sheffield, UK," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Riki Tesler & Pnina Plaut & Ronit Endvelt, 2018. "The Effects of an Urban Forest Health Intervention Program on Physical Activity, Substance Abuse, Psychosomatic Symptoms, and Life Satisfaction among Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Doo-San Kim & Byeong-Cheol Lee & Kwang-Hi Park, 2021. "Determination of Motivating Factors of Urban Forest Visitors through Latent Dirichlet Allocation Topic Modeling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Vujcic, Maja & Tomicevic-Dubljevic, Jelena, 2018. "Urban forest benefits to the younger population: The case study of the city of Belgrade, Serbia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 54-62.
    5. Gary Akehurst, 2009. "User generated content: the use of blogs for tourism organisations and tourism consumers," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 3(1), pages 51-61, March.
    6. Mingyu Zhang & Yuhuan Xia & Shuang Li & Wenbing Wu & Shuxiang Wang, 2019. "Crowd Logistics Platform’s Informative Support to Logistics Performance: Scale Development and Empirical Examination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nan Chao & Yu Zhou & Haifen Yang, 2024. "Digital Transformation of Rural Banks: Scale Development and Validation," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kwang-Hi Park, 2022. "Analysis of Urban Forest Healing Program Expected Values, Needs, and Preferred Components in Urban Forest Visitors with Diseases: A Pilot Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Galati, Antonino & Coticchio, Alessandro & Peiró-Signes, Ángel, 2023. "Identifying the factors affecting citizens' willingness to participate in urban forest governance: Evidence from the municipality of Palermo, Italy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    3. Zhang, Yingjie & Zhang, Tianzheng & Zeng, Yingxiang & Cheng, Baodong & Li, Hongxun, 2021. "Designating National Forest Cities in China: Does the policy improve the urban living environment?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    4. Kim, Kun & Park, Oun-joung & Yun, Seunghyun & Yun, Haejung, 2017. "What makes tourists feel negatively about tourism destinations? Application of hybrid text mining methodology to smart destination management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 362-369.
    5. Jiacong Wu & Yu Wang & Ru Zhang & Jing Cai, 2018. "An Approach to Discovering Product/Service Improvement Priorities: Using Dynamic Importance-Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-26, October.
    6. Amal Ponathil & Aasish Bhanu & Kalyan Piratla & Vivek Sharma & Kapil Chalil Madathil, 2024. "Investigation of the factors influencing the online consumer’s choice of a service provider for home improvement," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2519-2546, December.
    7. Adamantia Pateli & Naoum Mylonas & Aggeliki Spyrou, 2020. "Organizational Adoption of Social Media in the Hospitality Industry: An Integrated Approach Based on DIT and TOE Frameworks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Laura Lorente Bayona & Aurora Ruiz Rua, 2019. "The importance of online payment on Travel and Tourism incomes - A Cross-Country Panel Data Study," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 20, pages 199-222, January.
    9. repec:osf:osfxxx:ygq4t_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Wang, Saerom & Kirillova, Ksenia & Lehto, Xinran, 2017. "Reconciling unsatisfying tourism experiences: Message type effectiveness and the role of counterfactual thinking," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 233-243.
    11. Hanna Weimann & Jonas Björk & Carita Håkansson, 2019. "Experiences of the Urban Green Local Environment as a Factor for Well-Being among Adults: An Exploratory Qualitative Study in Southern Sweden," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-14, July.
    12. Ai, Hongshan & Zhou, Zhengqing, 2023. "Green growth: The impact of urban forest construction on economic growth in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Mariana Marques Lima & Emerson Wagner Mainardes & Ricardo Gouveia Rodrigues, 2020. "Tourist expectations and perception of service providers: a Brazilian perspective," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 14(1), pages 131-166, March.
    14. Sanaz Memari & Mahdieh Pazhouhanfar & Patrik Grahn, 2021. "Perceived Sensory Dimensions of Green Areas: An Experimental Study on Stress Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, May.
    15. Tseng, Chi & Wu, Bihu & Morrison, Alastair M. & Zhang, Jingru & Chen, Ying-chen, 2015. "Travel blogs on China as a destination image formation agent: A qualitative analysis using Leximancer," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 347-358.
    16. Jonathan P. Reeves & Conor H. D. John & Kevin A. Wood & Phoebe R. Maund, 2021. "A Qualitative Analysis of UK Wetland Visitor Centres as a Health Resource," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-25, August.
    17. Haifeng Li & Wenbo Chen & Wei He, 2015. "Planning of Green Space Ecological Network in Urban Areas: An Example of Nanchang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Nicoleta Andreea Neacsu & Anca Madar & Adrian Micu, 2015. "Marketing Strategies In The Rural Tourism From Romania," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 566-579.
    19. Orit Shapiro & Rachel Nissanholtz Gannot & Gizell Green & Avi Zigdon & Moti Zwilling & Ariela Giladi & Lilach Ben-Meir & Marques Adilson & Sharon Barak & Yossi Harel-Fisch & Riki Tesler, 2022. "Risk Behaviors, Family Support, and Emotional Health among Adolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Israel," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-13, March.
    20. DongHee Kim & SooCheong Shawn Jang, 2019. "The psychological and motivational aspects of restaurant experience sharing behavior on social networking sites," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(1), pages 25-49, March.
    21. Cheng Chai & Yao Song & Zhenzhen Qin, 2021. "A Thousand Words Express a Common Idea? Understanding International Tourists’ Reviews of Mt. Huangshan, China, through a Deep Learning Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:408-:d:1016041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.