IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3565-d773820.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multi-Agent Model-Based Evolutionary Model of Port Service Value Network and Decision Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Zhou

    (School of Government, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China)

  • Shanshan Shi

    (School of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116000, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center for Transport Studies, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116000, China)

  • Shaohua Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China)

Abstract

The rise of value networks in the new economic era and the emergence of a common competitive advantage pose enormous challenges to the value-added approach of enterprises based on traditional value chains. Based on the customer-centered concept, the complementary effect of agents, and other competition characteristics of the value network, this paper constructs a multi-agent-based value network evolution model. The influencing mechanism of customer preference on the number of value network entities and overall income is discussed through simulation analysis. The research shows that the influence of customer preference on the evolution and steady-state of the overall value of the value network is not significant. Customer preference plays a decisive role in the number of service subjects and the evolution of attributes. In different situations, the influence of customer preference on the number of subjects is significantly different. This means that customer power preference in the value network of port services is much higher than other preferences. The research results provide a decision-making basis for enterprises to break through the shackles of traditional value-added concepts, actively seek value network optimization schemes, and achieve timely responses to customer preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Zhou & Shanshan Shi & Shaohua Wang, 2022. "A Multi-Agent Model-Based Evolutionary Model of Port Service Value Network and Decision Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3565-:d:773820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3565/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3565/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nishino, Nariaki & Okazaki, Miki & Akai, Kenju, 2018. "Effects of ability difference and strategy imitation on cooperation network formation: A study with game theoretic modeling and multi-agent simulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 145-156.
    2. Assiouras, Ioannis & Skourtis, George & Giannopoulos, Antonios & Buhalis, Dimitrios & Koniordos, Michalis, 2019. "Value co-creation and customer citizenship behavior," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Huang, Keke & Chen, Xiaofang & Yu, Zhaofei & Yang, Chunhua & Gui, Weihua, 2018. "Heterogeneous cooperative belief for social dilemma in multi-agent system," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 572-579.
    4. Jun Yang & Andong Guo & Xueming Li & Tai Huang, 2018. "Study of the Impact of a High-Speed Railway Opening on China’s Accessibility Pattern and Spatial Equality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Vik Pant & Eric Yu, 2018. "Modeling Simultaneous Cooperation and Competition Among Enterprises," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(1), pages 39-54, February.
    6. Talley, Wayne K., 2019. "Note: Determinants of Cargo Port Choices by Cargo Port Service Providers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 48-50.
    7. Katarzyna Pietrucha-Urbanik & Janusz R. Rak, 2020. "Consumers’ Perceptions of the Supply of Tap Water in Crisis Situations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Hulda G. Black & Andrew S. Gallan, 2015. "Transformative service networks: cocreated value as well-being," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(15-16), pages 826-845, November.
    9. Peppard, Joe & Rylander, Anna, 0. "From Value Chain to Value Network:: Insights for Mobile Operators," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 24(2-3), pages 128-141, April.
    10. Bagheri, Samaneh & Kusters, Rob J. & Trienekens, Jos J.M., 2019. "Customer knowledge transfer challenges in a co-creation value network: Toward a reference model," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 198-214.
    11. Frank M. A. Klingert & Matthias Meyer, 2018. "Comparing Prediction Market Mechanisms: An Experiment-Based and Micro Validated Multi-Agent Simulation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 21(1), pages 1-7.
    12. Werner Hoffmann & Dovev Lavie & Jeffrey J. Reuer & Andrew Shipilov, 2018. "The interplay of competition and cooperation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(12), pages 3033-3052, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan Buczek & Dorota Bobrecka-Jamro & Marta Jańczak-Pieniążek, 2022. "Photosynthesis, Yield and Quality of Soybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merr.) under Different Soil-Tillage Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claude Paraponaris, 2017. "Plateformes numériques, conception ouverte et emploi," Post-Print halshs-01614430, HAL.
    2. Fragidis, Garyfallos & Kotzaivazoglou, Iordanis, 2022. "Goal modelling for strategic dependency analysis in destination management," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 8(2), pages 3-15.
    3. Ehrenhard, Michel & Kijl, Bjorn & Nieuwenhuis, Lambert, 2014. "Market adoption barriers of multi-stakeholder technology: Smart homes for the aging population," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 306-315.
    4. Józef Ober & Janusz Karwot, 2021. "Tap Water Quality: Seasonal User Surveys in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Wu, Yu’e & Zhang, Zhipeng & Yang, Guoli & Liu, Haixin & Zhang, Qingfeng, 2022. "Evolution of cooperation driven by diversity on a double-layer square lattice," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    6. Laya, Andrés & Sundquist, Mårten & Markendahl, Jan, 2015. "Motivation, Regulation And Actor Constellations - Experiences From A Multidisciplinary Research Project On Health And Wellbeing As Part Of The Internet Of Things," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127160, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    7. Baoliang Hu & Wei Huang & Shuai Yan & Guang Liu & Tao Zhang, 2020. "Business Model Design and Customer Loyalty: The Mediating Role of Customer Citizenship Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Huang, Keke & Liu, Yishun & Zhang, Yichi & Yang, Chunhua & Wang, Zhen, 2018. "Understanding cooperative behavior of agents with heterogeneous perceptions in dynamic networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 509(C), pages 234-240.
    9. Talley, Wayne K. & Ng, ManWo, 2022. "Cargo port choice equilibrium: The case of shipping lines and cargo port service providers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    10. Marcelo Royo-Vela & Jonathan Cuevas Lizama, 2022. "Creating Shared Value: Exploration in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Rather, Raouf Ahmad & Raisinghani, Manju & Gligor, David & Parrey, Shakir Hussain & Russo, Ivan & Bozkurt, Sıddık, 2023. "Examining tourist citizenship behaviors through affective, cognitive, behavioral engagement and reputation: Symmetrical and asymmetrical approaches," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    12. Abdelmoety, Ziad Hassan & Aboul-Dahab, Sameh & Agag, Gomaa, 2022. "A cross cultural investigation of retailers commitment to CSR and customer citizenship behaviour: The role of ethical standard and value relevance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    13. Shimei Jiang & Yimei Hu & Ziyuan Wang, 2019. "Core Firm Based View on the Mechanism of Constructing an Enterprise Innovation Ecosystem: A Case Study of Haier Group," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, June.
    14. Steffen Runge & Christian Schwens & Matthias Schulz, 2022. "The invention performance implications of coopetition: How technological, geographical, and product market overlaps shape learning and competitive tension in R&D alliances," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 266-294, February.
    15. Sanghoon Lee & Wonjoon Kim, 2017. "The knowledge network dynamics in a mobile ecosystem: a patent citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(2), pages 717-742, May.
    16. Valtteri Kaartemo & Helena Känsäkoski, 2018. "Information and Knowledge Processes in Health Care Value Co-Creation and Co-Destruction," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(4), pages 21582440188, December.
    17. Patrick Lynch & Jamie Power & Richard Hickey & Thomas Messervey, 2017. "Business model strategies: Flexibility trade in emerging low voltage distribution networks," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 4(3), pages 380-391, March.
    18. Frédéric Le Roy & Sea Matilda Bez & Johanna Gast, 2021. "Unpacking the management of Oligo-coopetition strategies in the absence of a moderating third party," Post-Print hal-03349671, HAL.
    19. Takey, Silvia Mayumi & Carvalho, Marly M., 2016. "Fuzzy front end of systemic innovations: A conceptual framework based on a systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 97-109.
    20. Yuewei Wang & Cong Lu & Hang Chen & Yuyan Zhao, 2022. "Evaluation and Spatial Characteristics of Cooperation among Tourist Attractions Based on a Geographic Information System: A Case Study of The Yangtze River Delta Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3565-:d:773820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.