IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3526-d773254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socio-Economic Factors Influencing Agritourism Farm Stays and Their Safety during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Zawadka

    (Department of Tourism, Social Communication and Counselling, Institute of Economics and Finance, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Anna Jęczmyk

    (Department of Law and Enterprise Management in Agribusiness, Faculty of Economics, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznań, Poland)

  • Monika Małgorzata Wojcieszak-Zbierska

    (Department of Economics and Economic Policy in Agribusiness, Faculty of Economics, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznań, Poland)

  • Gniewko Niedbała

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-627 Poznań, Poland)

  • Jarosław Uglis

    (Department of Law and Enterprise Management in Agribusiness, Faculty of Economics, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznań, Poland)

  • Joanna Pietrzak-Zawadka

    (Institute of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)

Abstract

The article presents reasons for the choices and opinions of tourists regarding rest and its safety in agritourism farms in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. We used the diagnostic survey method. We distributed the questionnaire via the Internet on Facebook in thematic groups related to tourism. Facebook respondents were also asked to provide a link to the questionnaire to their tourism-active friends (snowball sampling). We conducted the survey in January 2021. Research has shown that well-educated and well-off residents of cities most often chose agritourism. The main reason for the choice is the possibility of rest in peace and quiet, natural values, and an attractive price. Notably, during the pandemic, an important reason for choosing agritourism was to convince tourists that the risk of coronavirus infection was relatively low. This is also evidenced by the fact that most of them visited an agritourism farm for the first time during the pandemic. The attractiveness of staying on an agritourism farm was assessed highly (almost all respondents expressed their willingness to take advantage of this form of leisure again). This is due to the high evaluation of the quality of services provided, the offer’s attractiveness, and price competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Zawadka & Anna Jęczmyk & Monika Małgorzata Wojcieszak-Zbierska & Gniewko Niedbała & Jarosław Uglis & Joanna Pietrzak-Zawadka, 2022. "Socio-Economic Factors Influencing Agritourism Farm Stays and Their Safety during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3526-:d:773254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3526/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3526/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chew, Elaine Yin Teng & Jahari, Siti Aqilah, 2014. "Destination image as a mediator between perceived risks and revisit intention: A case of post-disaster Japan," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 382-393.
    2. Moric Ilija, 2013. "Clusters as a Factor of Rural Tourism Competitiveness: Montenegro Experiences," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 4(2), pages 94-107, December.
    3. Zawadka, Jan, 2019. "Agritourism As A Way Of Spending Free Time Of Urban Families With Children," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2019(3).
    4. Dimitris Skuras & Anastasia Petrou & Gordon Clark, 2006. "Demand for rural tourism: the effects of quality and information," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 35(2), pages 183-192, September.
    5. Sieczko, Anna & Sieczko, Leszek, 2018. "Determinanty popytu usług agroturystycznych," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 18(33, Part ), June.
    6. Monika Małgorzata Wojcieszak-Zbierska & Anna Jęczmyk & Jan Zawadka & Jarosław Uglis, 2020. "Agritourism in the Era of the Coronavirus (COVID-19): A Rapid Assessment from Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Jan & Zawadka & Agata & Balinska & Piotr & Gabryjonczyk, 2021. "Agritourism as a Form of Free Time Activity Among Families with Kids in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 571-582.
    8. Rebecca Hill & John Loomis & Dawn Thilmany & Martha Sullins, 2014. "Economic Values of Agritourism to Visitors: A Multi-Destination Hurdle Travel Cost Model of Demand," Tourism Economics, , vol. 20(5), pages 1047-1065, October.
    9. Kalaitzandonakes, Maria & Ellison, Brenna & Guarino, Jessica & Endres, Renata & Endres, Bryan, 2020. "Pumpkin Patches during the Pandemic: How Agritourism Operations in Illinois are Coping with Covid-19," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 10(200), November.
    10. Michał Roman & Monika Roman & Piotr Prus, 2020. "Innovations in Agritourism: Evidence from a Region in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    11. Tong Wu & Shida Rastegari Henneberry & John N. Ng’ombe & Richard T. Melstrom, 2020. "Chinese Demand for Agritourism in Rural America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-11, April.
    12. Vicky Katsoni (ed.), 2015. "Cultural Tourism in a Digital Era," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-319-15859-4, December.
    13. Sofia Karampela & Alexis Andreopoulos & Alex Koutsouris, 2021. "“Agro”, “Agri”, or “Rural”: The Different Viewpoints of Tourism Research Combined with Sustainability and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, August.
    14. Li, Junxiong & Nguyen, Thi Hong Hai & Coca-Stefaniak, J. Andres, 2021. "Coronavirus impacts on post-pandemic planned travel behaviours," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    15. Gil Arroyo, Claudia & Barbieri, Carla & Rozier Rich, Samantha, 2013. "Defining agritourism: A comparative study of stakeholders' perceptions in Missouri and North Carolina," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 39-47.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yung-Lun Liu & Jui-Te Chiang & Pen-Fa Ko, 2023. "The benefits of tourism for rural community development," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaowen Jin & Hao Wu & Jing Zhang & Guangming He, 2021. "Agritourism Development in the USA: The Strategy of the State of Michigan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Monika Małgorzata Wojcieszak-Zbierska & Anna Jęczmyk & Jan Zawadka & Jarosław Uglis, 2020. "Agritourism in the Era of the Coronavirus (COVID-19): A Rapid Assessment from Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Gabriela Popescu & Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tiberiu Iancu & Ioan Brad & Elena Peț & Tabita Adamov & Ramona Ciolac, 2022. "Sustainability through Rural Tourism in Moieciu Area-Development Analysis and Future Proposals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, April.
    4. repec:thr:techub:10034:y:2022:i:1:p:483-502 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Michał Roman & Piotr Grudzień, 2021. "The Essence of Agritourism and Its Profitability during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    6. Jones, Thomas E. & Yang, Yang & Yamamoto, Kiyotatsu, 2017. "Assessing the recreational value of world heritage site inscription: A longitudinal travel cost analysis of Mount Fuji climbers," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 67-78.
    7. Chee Hua Chin & May Chiun Lo & Zaidi bin Razak & Pooria Pasbakhsh & Abang Azlan Mohamad, 2020. "Resources Confirmation for Tourism Destinations Marketing Efforts Using PLS-MGA: The Moderating Impact of Semirural and Rural Tourism Destination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Kumar Bhatta & Yasuo Ohe, 2020. "A Review of Quantitative Studies in Agritourism: The Implications for Developing Countries," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Kenneth T. Benignos & Kristin Iris G. Estores, 2022. "Viability of an Integrated Farm as an Agritourism Site in Toboso, Negros Occidental inthe New Normal," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 34(1), pages 483-502, August.
    10. Brune, Sara & Knollenberg, Whitney & Vilá, Olivia, 2023. "Agritourism resilience during the COVID-19 crisis," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    11. Sofia Karampela & George Papapanos & Thanasis Kizos, 2019. "Perceptions of Agritourism and Cooperation: Comparisons between an Island and a Mountain Region in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, January.
    12. Dora Isabel Rodrigues Ferreira & José-Manuel Sánchez-Martín, 2022. "Agricultural Landscapes as a Basis for Promoting Agritourism in Cross-Border Iberian Regions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-35, May.
    13. NaHyun Lee & Bong-Seok Kim, 2023. "Differences of Host Country-Destination Image Assessment for International Students According to Risk Perception in COVID-19 Tourism," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    14. Elbek Togaymurodov & Michał Roman & Piotr Prus, 2023. "Opportunities and Directions of Development of Agritourism: Evidence from Samarkand Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, January.
    15. Alieh Abadi & Mehdi Khakzand, 2022. "Extracting the qualitative dimensions of agritourism for the sustainable development of Charqoli village in Iran: the promotion of vernacular entrepreneurship and environment-oriented preservation per," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12609-12671, November.
    16. Stylos, Nikolaos & Vassiliadis, Chris A. & Bellou, Victoria & Andronikidis, Andreas, 2016. "Destination images, holistic images and personal normative beliefs: Predictors of intention to revisit a destination," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 40-60.
    17. Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tiberiu Iancu & Gabriela Popescu & Tabita Adamov & Ramona Ciolac, 2023. "The Impact of Agritourism Activity on the Rural Environment: Findings from an Authentic Agritourist Area—Bukovina, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Zaitul Zaitul & Novianti Neva & Ilona Desi, 2022. "Village-Based Tourism Performance: Tourist Satisfaction and Revisit Intention," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 29(2), pages 36-43, June.
    19. Miroslav Rončák & Petr Scholz & Ivica Linderová, 2021. "Safety Concerns and Travel Behavior of Generation Z: Case Study from the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Mirosław Biczkowski & Aleksandra Jezierska-Thöle & Roman Rudnicki, 2021. "The Impact of RDP Measures on the Diversification of Agriculture and Rural Development—Seeking Additional Livelihoods: The Case of Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, March.
    21. Zulgani Zulgani & Junaidi Junaidi & Dwi Hastuti & Ernan Rustiadi & Andrea Emma Pravitasari & Fadwa Rhogib Asfahani, 2023. "Understanding the Emergence of Rural Agrotourism: A Study of Influential Factors in Jambi Province, Indonesia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-26, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3526-:d:773254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.