IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p3102-d765780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Success Factors for Concrete Recycling in Construction Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulmalek K. Badraddin

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Kuantan 26600, Malaysia)

  • Afiqah R. Radzi

    (Faculty of Built Environment, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Saud Almutairi

    (Unaizah College of Engineering, Qassim University, Buraydah 51431, Saudi Arabia)

  • Rahimi A. Rahman

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Kuantan 26600, Malaysia
    General Educational Development, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1230, Bangladesh)

Abstract

This study explores the success factors of concrete recycling in construction projects, using Malaysia as a case study. The objectives include (1) identifying the critical success factors for concrete recycling in construction projects, (2) comparing the critical success factors between large enterprises (LEs) and small–medium enterprises (SMEs), and (3) developing constructs that group the critical success factors. First, a list of success factors was identified through semi-structured interviews with fifteen construction industry professionals and a systematic literature review of journal articles. This list was then incorporated into a questionnaire and disseminated to industry professionals. Eighty-nine valid responses were collected and analyzed using mean score ranking, normalization, agreement analysis, and factor analysis techniques. The analyses showed ten critical success factors for concrete recycling. The critical success factors include the availability of uniform standards for concrete recycling, adequate awareness among project stakeholders on concrete recycling, appropriate construction waste management plans, government policies to support concrete recycling, good marketing strategy for concrete recycling, good communication among employees, applications for recycled concrete in sub-industries, provisions in work method statements on concrete recycling, positive legislation toward concrete recycling, and availability of concrete recycling infrastructure. However, the percentage of agreement between SMEs and LEs for the ten critical success factors was only 22%. In other words, there is no consensus on criticality across organizational sizes. Finally, the critical success factors can be categorized into two interrelated groups: external and internal. This study contributes to the literature by analyzing the necessary success factors for concrete recycling. The study findings allow researchers and practitioners to develop strategies to promote concrete recycling.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulmalek K. Badraddin & Afiqah R. Radzi & Saud Almutairi & Rahimi A. Rahman, 2022. "Critical Success Factors for Concrete Recycling in Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:3102-:d:765780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/3102/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/3102/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chakkrit Luangcharoenrat & Singh Intrachooto & Vachara Peansupap & Wandee Sutthinarakorn, 2019. "Factors Influencing Construction Waste Generation in Building Construction: Thailand’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, July.
    2. David L. Olson & Desheng Dash Wu, 2015. "Enterprise Risk Management," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT, chapter 1, pages 3-12, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Pedro Nuñez-Cacho & Jaroslaw Górecki & Valentín Molina-Moreno & Francisco A. Corpas-Iglesias, 2018. "What Gets Measured, Gets Done: Development of a Circular Economy Measurement Scale for Building Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Tam, Vivian W.Y. & Tam, C.M., 2006. "A review on the viable technology for construction waste recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 209-221.
    5. Mehmet Nurettin Uğural & Heyecan Giritli & Mariusz Urbański, 2020. "Determinants of the Turnover Intention of Construction Professionals: A Mediation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-12, January.
    6. James Wilkins, 2011. "Construction workers’ perceptions of health and safety training programmes," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(10), pages 1017-1026.
    7. Gangolells, Marta & Casals, Miquel & Forcada, Núria & Macarulla, Marcel, 2014. "Analysis of the implementation of effective waste management practices in construction projects and sites," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 99-111.
    8. M. M. M. Teo & M. Loosemore, 2001. "A theory of waste behaviour in the construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(7), pages 741-751.
    9. Henry Kaiser, 1974. "An index of factorial simplicity," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(1), pages 31-36, March.
    10. David L Olson & Desheng Dash Wu, 2015. "Enterprise Risk Management," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 9378, February.
    11. Abdulmalek K. Badraddin & Rahimi A. Rahman & Saud Almutairi & Muneera Esa, 2021. "Main Challenges to Concrete Recycling in Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mazen M. Omer & Rahimi A. Rahman & Saud Almutairi, 2022. "Strategies for Enhancing Construction Waste Recycling: A Usability Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdulmalek K. Badraddin & Rahimi A. Rahman & Saud Almutairi & Muneera Esa, 2021. "Main Challenges to Concrete Recycling in Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Muhammad Asad ur Rehman Naseer & Muhammad Ashfaq & Sarfraz Hassan & Azhar Abbas & Amar Razzaq & Mubashir Mehdi & Anoma Ariyawardana & Mumtaz Anwar, 2019. "Critical Issues at the Upstream Level in Sustainable Supply Chain Management of Agri-Food Industries: Evidence from Pakistan’s Citrus Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Li, Yongjian & Zhen, Xueping & Qi, Xiangtong & Cai, Gangshu (George), 2016. "Penalty and financial assistance in a supply chain with supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 167-181.
    4. Kamil J. Mizgier & Joseph M. Pasia & Srinivas Talluri, 2017. "Multiobjective capital allocation for supplier development under risk," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(18), pages 5243-5258, September.
    5. Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela & Nawrocki, Tomasz L., 2019. "Holistic fuzzy evaluation of operational risk in polish mining enterprises in a long-term and sectoral research perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Sadeghi, Razieh, 2019. "Pricing strategies in the competitive reverse supply chains with traditional and e-channels: A game theoretic approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 48-60.
    7. Udawatta, Nilupa & Zuo, Jian & Chiveralls, Keri & Zillante, George, 2015. "Improving waste management in construction projects: An Australian study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 73-83.
    8. Esa, Mohd Reza & Halog, Anthony & Rigamonti, Lucia, 2017. "Strategies for minimizing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 219-229.
    9. Caraiman Adrian-Cosmin & Mates Dorel, 2020. "Risk management in corporate governance," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 182-201, July.
    10. Heni Fitriani & Saheed Ajayi & Sunkuk Kim, 2022. "Analysis of the Underlying Causes of Waste Generation in Indonesia’s Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Levente Bakos & Dănuț Dumitru Dumitrașcu, 2021. "Decentralized Enterprise Risk Management Issues under Rapidly Changing Environments," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Junwei Zheng & Guangdong Wu, 2018. "Work-Family Conflict, Perceived Organizational Support and Professional Commitment: A Mediation Mechanism for Chinese Project Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, February.
    13. Bingsheng Liu & Meiqing Fu & Shuibo Zhang & Bin Xue & Qi Zhou & Shiruo Zhang, 2018. "An interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic group decision-making model based on the Choquet integral operator," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 407-424, January.
    14. Wang, Jiayuan & Li, Zhengdao & Tam, Vivian W.Y., 2014. "Critical factors in effective construction waste minimization at the design stage: A Shenzhen case study, China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-7.
    15. Sisimonda Kinya Mwanja, 2021. "Effect of operational and market risk exposures on financial performance of DT-Saccos in Kenya," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(5), pages 107-118, July.
    16. Jiming Cao & Cong Liu & Yubin Zhou & Kaifeng Duan, 2020. "Work-to-Family Conflict, Job Burnout, and Project Success among Construction Professionals: The Moderating Role of Affective Commitment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-22, April.
    17. Ivanov, Dmitry & Pavlov, Alexander & Dolgui, Alexandre & Pavlov, Dmitry & Sokolov, Boris, 2016. "Disruption-driven supply chain (re)-planning and performance impact assessment with consideration of pro-active and recovery policies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 7-24.
    18. Seda Tan & Gulden Gumusburun Ayalp & Muhammed Zubeyr Tel & Merve Serter & Yusuf Berkay Metinal, 2022. "Modeling the Critical Success Factors for BIM Implementation in Developing Countries: Sampling the Turkish AEC Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, August.
    19. Koen W. de Bock, 2017. "The best of two worlds: Balancing model strength and comprehensibility in business failure prediction using spline-rule ensembles," Post-Print hal-01588059, HAL.
    20. Chih-Yang Tsai, 2017. "The impact of cost structure on supply chain cash flow risk," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(22), pages 6624-6637, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:3102-:d:765780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.