IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2900-d762486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterization of Emissions in Fab Labs: An Additive Manufacturing Environment Issue

Author

Listed:
  • Shirin Khaki

    (Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, G-SCOP, 38000 Grenoble, France)

  • Maud Rio

    (Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, G-SCOP, 38000 Grenoble, France)

  • Philippe Marin

    (Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, G-SCOP, 38000 Grenoble, France)

Abstract

The emergence of additive manufacturing (AM) technologies, such as 3D printing and laser cutting, has created opportunities for new design practices covering a wide range of fields and a diversity of learning and teaching settings. The potential health impact of particulate matter and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from AM technologies is, therefore, a growing concern for makers. The research behind this paper addresses this issue by applying an indoor air quality assessment protocol in an educational fabrication laboratory. The paper presents the evaluation of the particle emission rate of different AM technologies. Real-time monitoring of multiple three-dimensional Polylactic Acid (PLA), Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) and Thermoplastic Elastomers (TPE) printers and Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) laser cutters was performed in different usage scenarios. Non-contact electrical detectors and off-line gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) were used to detect VOCs. The results show that the emitted particle surface area concentrations vary between 294 and 406.2 μm 2 /cm 3 for three-dimensional printers, and between 55.06 and 92.3 μm 2 /cm 3 for laser cutters. The experiments demonstrate that the emission concentrations were highly dependent on the filtration systems in place. The highest quantities of VOCs emitted included Cyclohexene and Benzyl Alcohol for PLA, ABS and TPE 3D printers, and formic acid and Xylene for PMMA laser cutters. The experiment concludes that signature emissions are detectable for a given material type and an AM technology pair. A suitable mitigation strategy can be specified for each signature detected. Finally, this paper outlines some guidelines for improving indoor air quality in such specific environments. The data provided, as well as the proposed indoor air quality protocol, can be used as a baseline for future studies, and thus help to determine whether the proposed strategies can enhance operator and bystander safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Shirin Khaki & Maud Rio & Philippe Marin, 2022. "Characterization of Emissions in Fab Labs: An Additive Manufacturing Environment Issue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2900-:d:762486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2900/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2900/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luís Mendes & Anneli Kangas & Kirsi Kukko & Bjarke Mølgaard & Arto Säämänen & Tomi Kanerva & Iñigo Flores Ituarte & Marika Huhtiniemi & Helene Stockmann-Juvala & Jouni Partanen & Kaarle Hämeri & Konst, 2017. "Characterization of Emissions from a Desktop 3D Printer," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(S1), pages 94-106, November.
    2. Parham Azimi & Torkan Fazli & Brent Stephens, 2017. "Predicting Concentrations of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds Resulting from Desktop 3D Printer Operation and the Impact of Potential Control Strategies," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(S1), pages 107-119, November.
    3. Martin Baumers & Joost R. Duflou & William Flanagan & Timothy G. Gutowski & Karel Kellens & Reid Lifset, 2017. "Charting the Environmental Dimensions of Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(S1), pages 9-14, November.
    4. Attaran, Mohsen, 2017. "The rise of 3-D printing: The advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 677-688.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asma Mecheter & Faris Tarlochan, 2023. "Fused Filament Fabrication Three-Dimensional Printing: Assessing the Influence of Geometric Complexity and Process Parameters on Energy and the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Noura Al-Mazrouei & Ali H. Al-Marzouqi & Waleed Ahmed, 2022. "Characterization and Sustainability Potential of Recycling 3D-Printed Nylon Composite Wastes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Panagiotis Karayannis & Stratos Saliakas & Ioannis Kokkinopoulos & Spyridon Damilos & Elias P. Koumoulos & Eleni Gkartzou & Julio Gomez & Constantinos Charitidis, 2022. "Facilitating Safe FFF 3D Printing: A Prototype Material Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Florinda Matos & Radu Godina & Celeste Jacinto & Helena Carvalho & Inês Ribeiro & Paulo Peças, 2019. "Additive Manufacturing: Exploring the Social Changes and Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Na Liu & Pui-Sze Chow & Hongshan Zhao, 2020. "Challenges and critical successful factors for apparel mass customization operations: recent development and case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 531-563, August.
    4. Jaya Priyadarshini & Rajesh Kr Singh & Ruchi Mishra & Surajit Bag, 2022. "Investigating the interaction of factors for implementing additive manufacturing to build an antifragile supply chain: TISM-MICMAC approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 567-588, June.
    5. Watanabe, Chihiro & Akhtar, Waleed & Tou, Yuji & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2021. "Amazon's New Supra-Omnichannel: Realizing Growing Seamless Switching for Apparel During COVID-19," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Shivam Gupta & Sachin Modgil & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Serena Strazzullo, 2022. "Additive Manufacturing and Green Information Systems as Technological Capabilities for Firm Performance," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 515-534, December.
    7. Tullio de Rubeis & Annamaria Ciccozzi & Letizia Giusti & Dario Ambrosini, 2022. "The 3D Printing Potential for Heat Flow Optimization: Influence of Block Geometries on Heat Transfer Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Florian Lüdeke‐Freund & Stefan Gold & Nancy M. P. Bocken, 2019. "A Review and Typology of Circular Economy Business Model Patterns," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 36-61, February.
    9. Konstantinos Kalkanis & Kyriaki Kiskira & Panagiotis Papageorgas & Stavros D. Kaminaris & Dimitrios Piromalis & George Banis & Dimitrios Mpelesis & Athanasios Batagiannis, 2023. "Advanced Manufacturing Design of an Emergency Mechanical Ventilator via 3D Printing—Effective Crisis Response," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.
    10. Radu Godina & Inês Ribeiro & Florinda Matos & Bruna T. Ferreira & Helena Carvalho & Paulo Peças, 2020. "Impact Assessment of Additive Manufacturing on Sustainable Business Models in Industry 4.0 Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    11. Sarka Bernatikova & Ales Dudacek & Radka Prichystalova & Vit Klecka & Lucie Kocurkova, 2021. "Characterization of Ultrafine Particles and VOCs Emitted from a 3D Printer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, January.
    12. Robert B. Handfield & James Aitken & Neil Turner & Tillmann Boehme & Cecil Bozarth, 2022. "Assessing Adoption Factors for Additive Manufacturing: Insights from Case Studies," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-22, June.
    13. Khadija Ajmal & Nallan C. Suresh & Charles X. Wang, 2021. "Disruptive Technologies and Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Review and Cross-Case Analysis," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 1-77, December.
    14. Antonio Sartal & Josep Llach & Fernando León-Mateos, 2022. "“Do technologies really affect that much? exploring the potential of several industry 4.0 technologies in today’s lean manufacturing shop floors”," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 6075-6106, November.
    15. Lesmana, Luthfan Adhy & Aziz, Muhammad, 2023. "Adoption of triply periodic minimal surface structure for effective metal hydride-based hydrogen storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    16. Cui, Weiwei & Yang, Yiran & Di, Lei, 2023. "Modeling and optimization for static-dynamic routing of a vehicle with additive manufacturing equipment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    17. Sebastian Larsen & Paul A. Hooper, 2022. "Deep semi-supervised learning of dynamics for anomaly detection in laser powder bed fusion," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 457-471, February.
    18. Alma van Oudheusden & Julieta Bolaños Arriola & Jeremy Faludi & Bas Flipsen & Ruud Balkenende, 2023. "3D Printing for Repair: An Approach for Enhancing Repair," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-33, March.
    19. Matthias M. Meyer & Andreas H. Glas & Michael Eßig, 2021. "Systematic review of sourcing and 3D printing: make-or-buy decisions in industrial buyer–supplier relationships," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(4), pages 723-752, October.
    20. Davide Castellani & Fabio Lamperti & Katiuscia Lavoratori, 2022. "Measuring adoption of industry 4.0 technologies via international trade data: insights from European countries," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(1), pages 51-93, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2900-:d:762486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.