IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2347-d752871.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing the Tension between Trust and Confidentiality in Mobile Supply Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Nassim Ghondaghsaz

    (Boysen-TU Dresden-Research Training Group, Technische Universität Dresden, 01187 Dresden, Germany
    Institute of Media and Communication Science, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany)

  • Zarina Chokparova

    (Boysen-TU Dresden-Research Training Group, Technische Universität Dresden, 01187 Dresden, Germany
    Process Control Systems and Process Systems Engineering Group, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany)

  • Sven Engesser

    (Institute of Media and Communication Science, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany)

  • Leon Urbas

    (Process Control Systems and Process Systems Engineering Group, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany)

Abstract

This research investigates the tension between trust and confidentiality in Mobile Supply Chains (MSCs), where a production asset that is owned by one of the partners is outsourced to another partner of the supply chain for the production of goods, chemicals, or pharmaceuticals. The novelty of the MSC concept is to be found in its innovative and sustainable approach to production and operation processes in supply chains. Implementation of the MSC model could, however, raise trust and confidentiality concerns. The interplay of trust and confidentiality, or preservation of information privacy, between partners plays a central role in the supply chains, particularly because they are genuinely dependent on each other. Qualitative data analysis was used, in which semi-structured interviews with the experts from the chemical and pharmaceutical industries in Germany were conducted to investigate the tension between trust and confidentiality, and important factors affecting it. The results of the study present four different integration scenarios, namely, the low-quality, conservative, grey-box, and innovation scenarios, which consider different levels of trust, confidentiality and information sharing. Subsequently, the tension between trust and confidentiality is analyzed within these scenarios, and three effective strategies which encourage partners to balance the tension between trust and confidentiality are proposed. The study indicates that the balance between trust and confidentiality can be maintained in some scenarios when critical factors such as transparency, trust negotiation, and a reward-sharing system are present.

Suggested Citation

  • Nassim Ghondaghsaz & Zarina Chokparova & Sven Engesser & Leon Urbas, 2022. "Managing the Tension between Trust and Confidentiality in Mobile Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2347-:d:752871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2347/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2347/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lode Li & Hongtao Zhang, 2008. "Confidentiality and Information Sharing in Supply Chain Coordination," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(8), pages 1467-1481, August.
    2. Tian Li & Shilu Tong & Hongtao Zhang, 2014. "Transparency of Information Acquisition in a Supply Chain," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 412-424, July.
    3. Frank J van Rijnsoever, 2017. "(I Can’t Get No) Saturation: A simulation and guidelines for sample sizes in qualitative research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Khakhar, Priyan & Rammal, Hussain Gulzar, 2013. "Culture and business networks: International business negotiations with Arab managers," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 578-590.
    5. Muhammad Nawaz Tunio & Mushtaque Ali Jariko & Tom Børsen & Sadia Shaikh & Tania Mushtaque & Mohsen Brahmi, 2021. "How Entrepreneurship Sustains Barriers in the Entrepreneurial Process—A Lesson from a Developing Nation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Wang, Yonggui & Wang, Na & Jiang, Ling & Yang, Zhilin & Cui, Victor, 2016. "Managing relationships with power advantage buyers: The role of supplier initiated bonding tactics in long-term buyer–supplier collaborations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5587-5596.
    7. Krzysztof Opolski & Piotr Modzelewski & Agata Kocia, 2019. "Interorganizational Trust and Effectiveness Perception in a Collaborative Service Delivery Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-27, September.
    8. Ali, Mohammad M. & Babai, Mohamed Zied & Boylan, John E. & Syntetos, A.A., 2017. "Supply chain forecasting when information is not shared," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 984-994.
    9. Becker, Tristan & Lier, Stefan & Werners, Brigitte, 2019. "Value of modular production concepts in future chemical industry production networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 957-970.
    10. Armbruster, D. & de Beer, C. & Freitag, M. & Jagalski, T. & Ringhofer, C., 2006. "Autonomous control of production networks using a pheromone approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 363(1), pages 104-114.
    11. Shahmoradi-Moghadam, Hani & Schönberger, Jörn, 2021. "Joint optimization of production and routing master planning in mobile supply chains," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    12. Huiqun Yuan & Hongbin Qiu & Ya Bi & Sheng-Hung Chang & Anthony Lam, 2020. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Analysis of coordination mechanism of supply chain management information system from the perspective of block chain," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 681-703, December.
    13. Goworek, Helen & Oxborrow, L. & Claxton, S. & McLaren, A. & Cooper, T. & Hill, H., 2020. "Managing sustainability in the fashion business: Challenges in product development for clothing longevity in the UK," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 629-641.
    14. Fawcett, Stanley E. & Jones, Stephen L. & Fawcett, Amydee M., 2012. "Supply chain trust: The catalyst for collaborative innovation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 163-178.
    15. Allman, Andrew & Zhang, Qi, 2020. "Dynamic location of modular manufacturing facilities with relocation of individual modules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 494-507.
    16. Brett Massimino & John V. Gray & Kenneth K. Boyer, 2017. "The Effects of Agglomeration and National Property Rights on Digital Confidentiality Performance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(1), pages 162-179, January.
    17. Stephen Fox, 2019. "Moveable Production Systems for Sustainable Development and Trade: Limitations, Opportunities and Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, September.
    18. Asunur Cezar & Huseyin Cavusoglu & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2014. "Outsourcing Information Security: Contracting Issues and Security Implications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 638-657, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eduardo Alarcon-Gerbier & Zarina Chokparova & Nassim Ghondaghsaz & Wanqi Zhao & Hani Shahmoradi-Moghadam & Uwe Aßmann & Orçun Oruç, 2022. "Software-Defined Mobile Supply Chains: Rebalancing Resilience and Efficiency in Production Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Jialu Li & Meiying Yang & Wei Xing & Xuan Zhao, 2018. "Information Acquisition Behavior: An Evolutionary Game Theory Perspective," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 434-455, June.
    3. Xiaowei Zhu, 2017. "Outsourcing management under various demand Information Sharing scenarios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 449-467, October.
    4. Ariane Kayser & Florian Sahling, 2023. "Relocatable modular capacities in risk aware strategic supply network planning under demand uncertainty," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 1-35, March.
    5. Bharadwaj Kadiyala & Özalp Özer & Alain Bensoussan, 2020. "A Mechanism Design Approach to Vendor Managed Inventory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(6), pages 2628-2652, June.
    6. Avinadav, Tal & Levy, Priel, 2022. "Value of information in a mobile app supply chain under hidden or known information superiority," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    7. Weili Xue & Jiaojiao Zuo & Xiaolin Xu, 2017. "Analysis of market competition and information asymmetry on selling strategies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 395-421, October.
    8. Lu, Jizhou & Feng, Gengzhong & Shum, Stephen & Lai, Kin Keung, 2021. "On the value of information sharing in the presence of information errors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 1139-1152.
    9. Guan, Xu & Huang, Song & Chen, Ying-Ju, 2022. "Acquisition transparency and induced supplier encroachment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. Wang, Jiao & Liu, Zhibing & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2019. "On the interaction between asymmetric demand signal and forecast accuracy information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 857-874.
    11. Jialu Li & Meiying Yang & Xuan Zhao, 2019. "Quantifying and mitigating inefficiency in information acquisition under competition," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(4), pages 985-1007, December.
    12. Liu, Hao & Jiang, Wei & Feng, Gengzhong & Chin, Kwai-Sang, 2020. "Information leakage and supply chain contracts," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Wu, Junjian & Wang, Haiyan & Shang, Jennifer, 2019. "Multi-sourcing and information sharing under competition and supply uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 658-671.
    14. Silva, Allyson & Aloise, Daniel & Coelho, Leandro C. & Rocha, Caroline, 2021. "Heuristics for the dynamic facility location problem with modular capacities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 435-452.
    15. Tatyana Chernonog, 2021. "Strategic information sharing in online retailing under a consignment contract with revenue sharing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 621-641, May.
    16. Malik, Sheraz Alam & Hingley, Martin K., 2021. "Consumer demand information as a re-balancing tool for power asymmetry between food retailers and suppliers," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 23(2), July.
    17. Kembro, Joakim & Näslund, Dag & Olhager, Jan, 2017. "Information sharing across multiple supply chain tiers: A Delphi study on antecedents," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 77-86.
    18. Kai-Lung Hui & Ping Fan Ke & Yuxi Yao & Wei T. Yue, 2019. "Bilateral Liability-Based Contracts in Information Security Outsourcing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 411-429, June.
    19. Judit Oláh & Attila Bai & György Karmazin & Péter Balogh & József Popp, 2017. "The Role Played by Trust and Its Effect on the Competiveness of Logistics Service Providers in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Shaikha Khalfan, 2024. "Wasta in business management: a critical review of recent developments and future trends in the tourism sector," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2347-:d:752871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.