IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16945-d1006511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Production from Cattle Manure within a Life Cycle Assessment Framework: Statistical Optimization of Co-Digestion, Pretreatment, and Thermal Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Alonso Albalate-Ramírez

    (Departamento de Ingenieria Quimica, Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Av. Universidad S/N, Cd. Universitaria, San Nicolas de los Garza 64451, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
    Centro de Investigacion en Biotecnologia y Nanotecnologia, Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Parque de Investigacion e Innovacion Tecnologica, km 10 Highway to the International Airport Mariano Escobedo, Apodaca 66629, Nuevo Leon, Mexico)

  • Mónica María Alcalá-Rodríguez

    (Departamento de Ingenieria Quimica, Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Av. Universidad S/N, Cd. Universitaria, San Nicolas de los Garza 64451, Nuevo Leon, Mexico)

  • Luis Ramiro Miramontes-Martínez

    (Departamento de Ingenieria Quimica, Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Av. Universidad S/N, Cd. Universitaria, San Nicolas de los Garza 64451, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
    Centro de Investigacion en Biotecnologia y Nanotecnologia, Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Parque de Investigacion e Innovacion Tecnologica, km 10 Highway to the International Airport Mariano Escobedo, Apodaca 66629, Nuevo Leon, Mexico)

  • Alejandro Padilla-Rivera

    (School of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Alejandro Estrada-Baltazar

    (Departamento de Ingenieria Quimica, Instituto Tecnologico de Celaya, Av. Tecnologico y A. Garcia Cubas S/N, Celaya 38010, Guanajuato, Mexico)

  • Brenda Nelly López-Hernández

    (Departamento de Ingenieria Quimica, Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Av. Universidad S/N, Cd. Universitaria, San Nicolas de los Garza 64451, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
    Centro de Investigacion en Biotecnologia y Nanotecnologia, Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Parque de Investigacion e Innovacion Tecnologica, km 10 Highway to the International Airport Mariano Escobedo, Apodaca 66629, Nuevo Leon, Mexico)

  • Pasiano Rivas-García

    (Departamento de Ingenieria Quimica, Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Av. Universidad S/N, Cd. Universitaria, San Nicolas de los Garza 64451, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
    Centro de Investigacion en Biotecnologia y Nanotecnologia, Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Parque de Investigacion e Innovacion Tecnologica, km 10 Highway to the International Airport Mariano Escobedo, Apodaca 66629, Nuevo Leon, Mexico)

Abstract

Waste to energy processes from anaerobic digestion (WtE-AD) from cattle manure (CM) have low CH 4 yields due to CM’s structural composition. The search for alternatives to increase the energy yields of these processes must consider the optimization of operating parameters within a framework of mitigating the environmental footprint. The goal of this paper is to provide a statistical optimization strategy based on experimental designs to improve CH 4 yields and reduce the environmental profile of CM valorization through a WtE-AD process. Biochemical methane potential tests were conducted to determine the energetic and environmental effects that alkaline pretreatments, different AD temperatures, and co-digestion formulations with fruit and vegetable waste (FVW) have on the WtE-AD process from CM. The evaluation was conducted following a life cycle assessment approach through energy balances. The results indicate that the highest CH 4 yield (384.3 mL CH 4 g VS −1 ) and the lowest environmental impact (−0.06 kg CO 2 eq kWh −1 of electricity production) were achieved with the co-digestion of CM with FVW 1:1, pretreatment with 10 g NaOH 100 g −1 of VS of CM, and a temperature of 45 °C. It was found that the CM pretreatment with NaOH substantially increases the energy profile of the WtE-AD process without compromising the environmental impact since greenhouse gas emissions in chemical production are negligible.

Suggested Citation

  • Alonso Albalate-Ramírez & Mónica María Alcalá-Rodríguez & Luis Ramiro Miramontes-Martínez & Alejandro Padilla-Rivera & Alejandro Estrada-Baltazar & Brenda Nelly López-Hernández & Pasiano Rivas-García, 2022. "Energy Production from Cattle Manure within a Life Cycle Assessment Framework: Statistical Optimization of Co-Digestion, Pretreatment, and Thermal Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16945-:d:1006511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16945/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16945/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raquel Iglesias & Raúl Muñoz & María Polanco & Israel Díaz & Ana Susmozas & Antonio D. Moreno & María Guirado & Nely Carreras & Mercedes Ballesteros, 2021. "Biogas from Anaerobic Digestion as an Energy Vector: Current Upgrading Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-30, May.
    2. Zupančič, G.D. & Roš, M., 2003. "Heat and energy requirements in thermophilic anaerobic sludge digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(14), pages 2255-2267.
    3. Hall, Charles A.S. & Lambert, Jessica G. & Balogh, Stephen B., 2014. "EROI of different fuels and the implications for society," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 141-152.
    4. Francesco Calise & Francesco Liberato Cappiello & Massimo Dentice d’Accadia & Alessandra Infante & Maria Vicidomini, 2020. "Modeling of the Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Wastes: Integration of Heat Transfer and Biochemical Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Orlando Corigliano & Marco Iannuzzi & Crescenzo Pellegrino & Francesco D’Amico & Leonardo Pagnotta & Petronilla Fragiacomo, 2023. "Enhancing Energy Processes and Facilities Redesign in an Anaerobic Digestion Plant for Biomethane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-29, August.
    2. Roberto Eloy Hernández Regalado & Jurek Häner & Elmar Brügging & Jens Tränckner, 2022. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Solid–Liquid Biogas Treatment Plants for the Agro-Industrial Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Jonathan Dumas & Antoine Dubois & Paolo Thiran & Pierre Jacques & Francesco Contino & Bertrand Cornélusse & Gauthier Limpens, 2022. "The Energy Return on Investment of Whole-Energy Systems: Application to Belgium," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 1-34, December.
    4. Omar, M.N. & Samak, A.A. & Keshek, M.H. & Elsisi, S.F., 2020. "Simulation and validation model for using the energy produced from broiler litter waste in their house and its requirement of energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 920-928.
    5. Tiziano Gomiero, 2015. "Are Biofuels an Effective and Viable Energy Strategy for Industrialized Societies? A Reasoned Overview of Potentials and Limits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-31, June.
    6. Florian Fizaine & Victor Court, 2016. "The energy-economic growth relationship: a new insight from the EROI perspective," Working Papers 1601, Chaire Economie du climat.
    7. Lukáš Režný & Vladimír Bureš, 2019. "Energy Transition Scenarios and Their Economic Impacts in the Extended Neoclassical Model of Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-25, July.
    8. Charles Guay-Boutet, 2023. "Estimating the Disaggregated Standard EROI of Canadian Oil Sands Extracted via Open-pit Mining, 1997–2016," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Hong, Sanghyun & Kim, Eunsung & Jeong, Saerok, 2023. "Evaluating the sustainability of the hydrogen economy using multi-criteria decision-making analysis in Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 485-492.
    10. Ross Astoria, 2016. "The legal configuration of hydrocarbon infrastructure," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-51, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Tiziano Gomiero, 2016. "Soil Degradation, Land Scarcity and Food Security: Reviewing a Complex Challenge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-41, March.
    12. Bekkering, J. & Hengeveld, E.J. & van Gemert, W.J.T. & Broekhuis, A.A., 2015. "Will implementation of green gas into the gas supply be feasible in the future?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 409-417.
    13. Zhaoyang Kong & Xiucheng Dong & Bo Xu & Rui Li & Qiang Yin & Cuifang Song, 2015. "EROI Analysis for Direct Coal Liquefaction without and with CCS: The Case of the Shenhua DCL Project in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22, January.
    14. Cao, Yan & Doustgani, Amir & Salehi, Abozar & Nemati, Mohammad & Ghasemi, Amir & Koohshekan, Omid, 2020. "The economic evaluation of establishing a plant for producing biodiesel from edible oil wastes in oil-rich countries: Case study Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    15. June Sekera, 2017. "Missing from the Mainstream: The Biophysical Basis of Production and the Public Economy," GDAE Working Papers 17-02, GDAE, Tufts University.
    16. Ron Swenson, 2016. "The Solarevolution: Much More with Way Less, Right Now—The Disruptive Shift to Renewables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-22, August.
    17. Flavio R. Arroyo M. & Luis J. Miguel, 2019. "The Trends of the Energy Intensity and CO 2 Emissions Related to Final Energy Consumption in Ecuador: Scenarios of National and Worldwide Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Le Boulzec, Hugo & Delannoy, Louis & Andrieu, Baptiste & Verzier, François & Vidal, Olivier & Mathy, Sandrine, 2022. "Dynamic modeling of global fossil fuel infrastructure and materials needs: Overcoming a lack of available data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    19. Joseph S. Pechsiri & Fredrik Gröndahl, 2022. "Assessing energy return on investment for harvest of wild Nodularia spumigena during blooms in the Baltic Sea," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 1979-1991, December.
    20. Jiří Jaromír Klemeš & Petar Sabev Varbanov & Paweł Ocłoń & Hon Huin Chin, 2019. "Towards Efficient and Clean Process Integration: Utilisation of Renewable Resources and Energy-Saving Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-32, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16945-:d:1006511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.