IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16590-d1000087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance, and Performance of Listed Companies—An Empirical Application of a Semi-Parametric Quantile Regression Model

Author

Listed:
  • Jiamin Nie

    (School of Sciences, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Shanli Ye

    (School of Sciences, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

Abstract

China’s listed companies have different ownership characteristics and market environments from those of other countries and thus exhibit vastly different changes. From the existing corporate life cycle perspective, companies differ in their different development stages, which makes each factor’s effect dynamic. How to adjust the governance mechanism to the requirements of the company’s stage of development is an urgent issue in sustainable corporate governance. To address the above issues, we establish a semi-parametric quantile regression model to analyze the relationship between the ownership structure and corporate performance based on the data of listed companies on the Shanghai Stock Exchange between 2013 and 2021. Moreover, corporate governance measures taken at different stages of the corporate life cycle are discussed to see whether they effectively improve corporate governance. We conclude that there are non-linear effects of ownership structure while dynamic changes in corporate governance mechanisms exist. Companies should be concerned about the non-linear effects of ownership structures while considering the company’s life cycle and choosing appropriate governance measures. The results will help develop a sustainable development strategy to ensure that the company can improve its profitability and mitigate agency problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiamin Nie & Shanli Ye, 2022. "Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance, and Performance of Listed Companies—An Empirical Application of a Semi-Parametric Quantile Regression Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16590-:d:1000087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16590/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16590/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Habib, Ahsan & Hasan, Mostafa Monzur, 2019. "Corporate life cycle research in accounting, finance and corporate governance: A survey, and directions for future research," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 188-201.
    2. Dominik Dienes & Patrick Velte, 2016. "The Impact of Supervisory Board Composition on CSR Reporting. Evidence from the German Two-Tier System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Huang, Bingbing & Zhang, Xuehui & Bi, Qian, 2022. "The nonlinear effect of shareholder ownership structure on a firm's cash holdings: Type I and Type II agency problem perspectives in China's split-share reform," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 493-504.
    4. Fama, Eugene F. & Jensen, Michael C., 1985. "Organizational forms and investment decisions," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 101-119, March.
    5. Ahsan Habib & Mostafa Monzur Hasan, 2017. "Firm life cycle, corporate risk-taking and investor sentiment," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(2), pages 465-497, June.
    6. Alex Edmans & Xavier Gabaix, 2009. "Is CEO Pay Really Inefficient? A Survey of New Optimal Contracting Theories," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 15(3), pages 486-496, June.
    7. Zeitun, Rami & Goaied, Mohamed, 2021. "The nonlinear effect of foreign ownership on capital structure in Japan: A panel threshold analysis," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. Hasan Mohamad Bamahros & Abdulsalam Alquhaif & Ameen Qasem & Wan Nordin Wan-Hussin & Murad Thomran & Shaker Dahan Al-Duais & Siti Norwahida Shukeri & Hytham M. A. Khojally, 2022. "Corporate Governance Mechanisms and ESG Reporting: Evidence from the Saudi Stock Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Lehn, Kenneth & Patro, Sukesh & Zhao, Mengxin, 2007. "Governance indexes and valuation: Which causes which?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 907-928, December.
    10. Elif Akben-Selcuk, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Moderating Role of Ownership Concentration in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-10, July.
    11. Aswini Kumar Mishra & R.L. Manogna & Shikhar Jain, 2022. "Impact of board characteristics and ownership structure on firm performance: empirical evidence from India," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 28(2), pages 227-245.
    12. Roger Koenker & Vasco d'Orey, 1994. "A Remark on Algorithm as 229: Computing Dual Regression Quantiles and Regression Rank Scores," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 43(2), pages 410-414, June.
    13. Lo, Huai-Chun & Ting, Irene Wei Kiong & Kweh, Qian Long & Yang, Ming Jing, 2016. "Nonlinear association between ownership concentration and leverage: The role of family control," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 113-123.
    14. Sanja Pekovic & Sebastian Vogt, 2021. "The fit between corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: the impact on a firm’s financial performance," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1095-1125, May.
    15. Akshita Arora, 2022. "Gender diversity in boardroom and its impact on firm performance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(3), pages 735-755, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ammar Hussain & Minhas Akbar & Muhammad Kaleem Khan & Ahsan Akbar & Mirela Panait & Marian Catalin Voica, 2020. "When Does Earnings Management Matter? Evidence across the Corporate Life Cycle for Non-Financial Chinese Listed Companies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Bilal Ahmed & Minhas Akbar & Tanazza Sabahat & Saqib Ali & Ammar Hussain & Ahsan Akbar & Xie Hongming, 2020. "Does Firm Life Cycle Impact Corporate Investment Efficiency?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Bikki Jaggi & Alessandra Allini & Raffaela Casciello & Fiorenza Meucci, 2022. "Firm life cycle stages and earnings management," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1019-1049, October.
    4. Mostafa Monzur Hasan & Adrian (Wai‐Kong) Cheung & Lidia Tunas & Hung Wan Kot, 2021. "Firm life cycle and trade credit," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 56(4), pages 743-771, November.
    5. Minhas Akbar & Ahsan Akbar & Muhammad Azeem Qureshi & Petra Poulova, 2021. "Sentiments–Risk Relationship across the Corporate Life Cycle: Evidence from an Emerging Market," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Pavol Durana & Lucia Michalkova & Andrej Privara & Josef Marousek & Milos Tumpach, 2021. "Does the life cycle affect earnings management and bankruptcy?," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(2), pages 425-461, June.
    7. Chan-Jane Lin & Tawei Wang & Chao-Jung Pan, 2016. "Financial reporting quality and investment decisions for family firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 499-532, June.
    8. Dendi Ramdani & Arjen Witteloostuijn, 2012. "The Shareholder–Manager Relationship and Its Impact on the Likelihood of Firm Bribery," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(4), pages 495-507, July.
    9. David Hillier & Patrick McColgan, 2008. "An analysis of majority owner‐managed companies in the UK," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(4), pages 603-623, December.
    10. Francesca Franco & Christopher D. Ittner & Oktay Urcan, 2017. "Determinants and Trading Performance of Equity Deferrals by Corporate Outside Directors," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 114-138, January.
    11. Hu, Juncheng, 2021. "Do facilitation payments affect earnings management? Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. Fiaz Ahmad Sulehri & Saba Sharif, 2022. "The Impact of Firm Sustainability on Firm Growth: Evidence from USA," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, August.
    13. Oyer, Paul & Schaefer, Scott, 2011. "Personnel Economics: Hiring and Incentives," Handbook of Labor Economics, in: O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 20, pages 1769-1823, Elsevier.
    14. Alessandro Fedele & Luca Panaccione, 2020. "Moral hazard and compensation packages: does reshuffling matter?," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 70(1), pages 223-241, July.
    15. Steen Thomsen & Caspar Rose, 2004. "Foundation Ownership and Financial Performance: Do Companies Need Owners?," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 343-364, December.
    16. Rubio-Andrés, Mercedes & Ramos-González, Mª del Mar & Sastre-Castillo, Miguel Ángel & Gutiérrez-Broncano, Santiago, 2023. "Stakeholder pressure and innovation capacity of SMEs in the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating and multigroup analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    17. Hwang, Sunwoo & Kim, Woochan, 2011. "Managerial entrenchment of anti-takeover devices: quasi-experimental evidence from Korea," MPRA Paper 44030, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Minhas Akbar & Ahsan Akbar & Petra Maresova & Minghui Yang & Hafiz Muhammad Arshad, 2020. "Unraveling the Bankruptcy Risk‒Return Paradox across the Corporate Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, April.
    19. Sana Ben Abdallah & Dhafer Saidane & Sami Ben Mim, 2024. "The impact of governance on environmental performance: evidence from African countries," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 44(1), pages 122-139.
    20. Tian, Zengrui & Zhu, Bingsheng & Lu, Yuzhong, 2023. "The governance of non-state shareholders and corporate ESG: Empirical evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16590-:d:1000087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.