IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p16297-d995320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consistency of Central and Regional Planning in the Agricultural Sectors and the Factors Affecting It in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Wahyudi

    (Doctoral Program of Development Studies, Graduate School, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia)

  • Imam Mujahidin Fahmid

    (Department of Agricultural Socio-Economic, Faculty of Agriculture, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia)

  • Darmawan Salman

    (Department of Agricultural Socio-Economic, Faculty of Agriculture, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia)

  • Sultan Suhab

    (Faculty of Economic, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia)

Abstract

A strategic issue in national development is the integration between national and regional planning. This research had the aims to: (1) analyse the consistency and integration between national and regional plans, (2) analyse the consistency of national and regional planning with the actual implementation, and (3) analyse the factors that influenced the inconsistencies of national and regional planning in the agricultural sectors. The research was carried out by the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA), Indramayu Regency, in West Java Province and South Lampung Regency in Lampung Province. The data were analysed using both content and consistency analyses and a comparative case study. The research results showed that: (1) the level of consistency between the planning documents from the MoA and those from Indramayu Regency reached 87.68% and 95.81%, when compared with those from South Lampung Regency; (2) in terms of the consistency between the documents and the actual implementation, South Lampung Regency had programs/activities which were more integrated with the MoA programs compared with Indramayu Regency; and (3) there were five main factors which caused inconsistencies: policies from the district heads and the parties involved, force majeure, the development priorities, the communication distortion, and support from the political parties. The central government (the MoA) and the Regional Agriculture Office must collaborate by making an electronic-based priority scale of development planning and by reinforcing the capacities of regional planners.

Suggested Citation

  • Wahyudi & Imam Mujahidin Fahmid & Darmawan Salman & Sultan Suhab, 2022. "Consistency of Central and Regional Planning in the Agricultural Sectors and the Factors Affecting It in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16297-:d:995320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16297/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16297/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikaela Vasstrøm & Roger Normann, 2019. "The role of local government in rural communities: culture-based development strategies," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 848-868, November.
    2. Rudy Badrudin & Baldric Siregar, 2015. "The evaluation of the implementation of regional autonomy in Indonesia," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 7(1), pages 1-11.
    3. Loizou, Efstratios & Karelakis, Christos & Galanopoulos, Konstantinos & Mattas, Konstadinos, 2019. "The role of agriculture as a development tool for a regional economy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 482-490.
    4. Liu, Tao & Huang, Daquan & Tan, Xin & Kong, Fanhao, 2020. "Planning consistency and implementation in urbanizing China: Comparing urban and land use plans in suburban Beijing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Falguni Mukherjee, 2020. "Institutional Networks of Association for GIS Use: The Case of an Urban Local Body in India," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(5), pages 1445-1463, September.
    6. Mogues, Tewodaj & Billings, Lucy, 2019. "The making of public investments: The role of champions, co-ordination, and characteristics of nutrition programmes in Mozambique," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 29-38.
    7. Rudy Badrudin & Baldric Siregar, 2015. "The evaluation of the implementation of regional autonomy in Indonesia," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 7(1), pages 1-11, April.
    8. Rich, Karl M. & Rich, Magda & Dizyee, Kanar, 2018. "Participatory systems approaches for urban and peri-urban agriculture planning: The role of system dynamics and spatial group model building," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 110-123.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fafurida & Erliz Nindi Pratiwi, 2017. "Financial independence of regencies and cities in Central Java," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 9(2), pages 199-209, April.
    2. Rudy Badrudin & Manggar Wulan Kusuma & Ranti Yulia Wardani, 2018. "The inclusive economic development model in Sulawesi island," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 10(2), pages 128-136, Oktober.
    3. Khasandy, Elleriz Aisha & Badrudin, Rudy, 2019. "The Influence of Zakat on Economic Growth and Welfare Society in Indonesia," MPRA Paper 91574, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Alexandros Gkatsikos & Konstadinos Mattas, 2021. "The Paradox of the Virtual Water Trade Balance in the Mediterranean Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Neema Ciza Angélique & Vwima Stany & Philippe Lebailly & Hossein Azadi, 2022. "Agricultural Development in the Fight against Poverty: The Case of South Kivu, DR Congo," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Hongtao Jia & Lei Zhu & Jing Du, 2022. "Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model of the Farmers’ Sense of Gain in the Provision of Rural Infrastructures: The Case of Tourism-Oriented Rural Areas of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Berends, Jared & Rich, Karl M. & Kaitibie, Simeon & Lyne, Michael C., 2021. "Ex-ante evaluation of interventions to upgrade pork value chains in Southern Myanmar," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    8. Alexandros Gkatsikos & Dimitrios Natos & Christos Staboulis & Konstadinos Mattas & Michail Tsagris & Apostolos Polymeros, 2022. "An Impact Assessment of the Young Farmers Scheme Policy on Regional Growth in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-12, March.
    9. Ajoy Ketan Sarangi & Rudra Prakash Pradhan, 2020. "ICT infrastructure and economic growth: a critical assessment and some policy implications," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 47(4), pages 363-383, December.
    10. repec:zib:zbseps:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:72-78 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Cooper, Gregory S. & Rich, Karl M. & Shankar, Bhavani & Rana, Vinay & Ratna, Nazmun N. & Kadiyala, Suneetha & Alam, Mohammad J. & Nadagouda, Sharan B., 2021. "Identifying ‘win-win-win’ futures from inequitable value chain trade-offs: A system dynamics approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    12. Marc F. Bellemare & Vaneesha Dusoruth, 2021. "Who Participates in Urban Agriculture? An Empirical Analysis†," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 430-442, March.
    13. Muyambiri, Brian, 2024. "The role of agriculture, industry and the service sector in economic growth: The case of Mozambique," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 18(2), January.
    14. Andrew P. Barnes, 2023. "The role of family life‐cycle events on persistent and transient inefficiencies in less favoured areas," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 295-315, February.
    15. Qiao, Weifeng & Hu, Yi & Jia, Kaiyang & He, Tianqi & Wang, Yahua, 2020. "Dynamic modes and ecological effects of salt field utilization in the Weifang coastal area, China: Implications for territorial spatial planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    16. Yuta Uchiyama & Ryo Kohsaka, 2020. "Access and Use of Green Areas during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Green Infrastructure Management in the “New Normal”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-9, November.
    17. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Efstratios Loizou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis & Anastasios Michailidis & Christos Karelakis & Yannis Fallas & Aikaterini Paltaki, 2023. "What Makes Farmers Aware in Adopting Circular Bioeconomy Practices? Evidence from a Greek Rural Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Karakadzai, Thomas & Bandauko, Elmond & Chaeruka, Joel & Arku, Godwin, 2023. "Examining the conformance of development to local spatial plans amid rapid urbanisation in Harare, Zimbabwe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    19. Elshurafa, Amro M. & Alatawi, Hatem & Hasanov, Fakhri J. & Algahtani, Goblan J. & Felder, Frank A., 2022. "Cost, emission, and macroeconomic implications of diesel displacement in the Saudi agricultural sector: Options and policy insights," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    20. Muflikh, Y.N. & Smith, C. & Brown, C. & Aziz, A.A., 2021. "Analysing price volatility in agricultural value chains using systems thinking: A case study of the Indonesian chilli value chain," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    21. Piotr Jurga & Efstratios Loizou & Stelios Rozakis, 2021. "Comparing Bioeconomy Potential at National vs. Regional Level Employing Input-Output Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16297-:d:995320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.