IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p13764-d951601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Pools in a 77 Year-Old Oak Forest under Conversion from Coppice to High Forest

Author

Listed:
  • Petros Ganatsas

    (Laboratory of Silviculture, Department of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 262, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Marianthi Tsakaldimi

    (Laboratory of Silviculture, Department of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 262, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Theodoros Karydopoulos

    (Laboratory of Silviculture, Department of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 262, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Lydia-Maria Petaloudi

    (Laboratory of Silviculture, Department of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 262, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Alexandros Papaemmanouil

    (Laboratory of Silviculture, Department of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 262, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Sotirios Papadopoulos

    (Laboratory of Silviculture, Department of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 262, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Sofia Gerochristou

    (Laboratory of Silviculture, Department of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 262, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

Recent model projections and many research results across the world suggest that forests could be significant carbon sinks or sources in the future, contributing in a such a way to global warming mitigation. Conversion of coppice forest to high forest may play an important role towards this direction. This study deals with the estimation of biomass, carbon pool and accumulation rates in all IPCC biomass categories of a 77 year-old oak ecosystem, which has been subjected to conversion from coppice to high forest through repeated tending measures. The research includes a plethora of field tree measurements, destructive sampling of representative oak trees and a systematic sampling of dead wood (standing and fallen), litter and soil. Furthermore, for the estimation of above ground tree living biomass at the stand level, we developed and tested appropriate allometric biomass equations based on the relationships between various independent tree variables (morphological characteristics) and the different tree biomass compartments or leaf biomass. Data analysis shows that coppice conversion results in large accumulation of carbon in all ecosystem pools, with an average annual carbon rate accumulation of 1.97 Mg ha –1 in living above and below ground tree biomass and small amounts to dead wood and litter. The developed allometric equations indicate that above ground tree living biomass can be reliable and precisely predicted by the simple measurement of tree diameter.

Suggested Citation

  • Petros Ganatsas & Marianthi Tsakaldimi & Theodoros Karydopoulos & Lydia-Maria Petaloudi & Alexandros Papaemmanouil & Sotirios Papadopoulos & Sofia Gerochristou, 2022. "Carbon Pools in a 77 Year-Old Oak Forest under Conversion from Coppice to High Forest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13764-:d:951601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13764/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13764/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michal Kneifl & Jan Kadavý & Robert Knott & Zdeněk Adamec & Karel Drápela, 2015. "An Inventory of Tree and Stand Growth Empirical Modelling Approaches with Potential Application in Coppice Forestry (a Review)," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 63(5), pages 1789-1801.
    2. Valentin Bellassen & Sebastiaan Luyssaert, 2014. "Carbon sequestration: Managing forests in uncertain times," Nature, Nature, vol. 506(7487), pages 153-155, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diyamandoglu, Vasil & Fortuna, Lorena M., 2015. "Deconstruction of wood-framed houses: Material recovery and environmental impact," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 21-30.
    2. Baranzini, Andrea & Borzykowski, Nicolas & Carattini, Stefano, 2018. "Carbon offsets out of the woods? Acceptability of domestic vs. international reforestation programmes in the lab," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Lund, Peter D., 2017. "Implications of Finland's plan to ban coal and cutting oil use," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 78-80.
    4. Andrea Baranzini & Nicolas Borzykowski & Stefano Carattini, 2016. "Carbon offsets out of the woods? The acceptability of domestic vs. international reforestation programmes," GRI Working Papers 257, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    5. Christopher Coutts & Micah Hahn, 2015. "Green Infrastructure, Ecosystem Services, and Human Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-31, August.
    6. Rory J. Layton & Rachel Horta Arduin & Haji Yazdeen & Regis Pommier & Guido Sonnemann, 2021. "Material Flow Analysis to Evaluate Supply Chain Evolution and Management: An Example Focused on Maritime Pine in the Landes de Gascogne Forest, France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-12, April.
    7. Akhlaq Amin Wani & Amir Farooq Bhat & Aaasif Ali Gatoo & Shiba Zahoor & Basira Mehraj & Naveed Najam & Qaisar Shafi Wani & M A Islam & Shah Murtaza & Moonisa Aslam Dervash & P K Joshi, 2021. "Assessing relationship of forest biophysical factors with NDVI for carbon management in key coniferous strata of temperate Himalayas," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Asitha De Silva & Dilanthi Amaratunga & Richard Haigh, 2022. "Green and Blue Infrastructure as Nature-Based Better Preparedness Solutions for Disaster Risk Reduction: Key Policy Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
    9. Jean C. Bikomeye & Sima Namin & Chima Anyanwu & Caitlin S. Rublee & Jamie Ferschinger & Ken Leinbach & Patricia Lindquist & August Hoppe & Lawrence Hoffman & Justin Hegarty & Dwayne Sperber & Kirsten , 2021. "Resilience and Equity in a Time of Crises: Investing in Public Urban Greenspace Is Now More Essential Than Ever in the US and Beyond," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-39, August.
    10. Kadukothanahally Nagaraju Shivaprakash & Niraj Swami & Sagar Mysorekar & Roshni Arora & Aditya Gangadharan & Karishma Vohra & Madegowda Jadeyegowda & Joseph M. Kiesecker, 2022. "Potential for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) Applications in Biodiversity Conservation, Managing Forests, and Related Services in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Juan F. Fernández-Manjarrés & Paloma Ruiz-Benito & Miguel A. Zavala & J. Julio Camarero & Fernando Pulido & Vânia Proença & Laetitia Navarro & Roxane Sansilvestri & Elena Granda & Laura Marqués & Mart, 2018. "Forest Adaptation to Climate Change along Steep Ecological Gradients: The Case of the Mediterranean-Temperate Transition in South-Western Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Blattert, Clemens & Lemm, Renato & Thürig, Esther & Stadelmann, Golo & Brändli, Urs-Beat & Temperli, Christian, 2020. "Long-term impacts of increased timber harvests on ecosystem services and biodiversity: A scenario study based on national forest inventory data," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    13. Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Griffiths, Steve & Bazilian, Morgan & Kim, Jinsoo & Foley, Aoife M. & Rooney, David, 2022. "Decarbonizing the pulp and paper industry: A critical and systematic review of sociotechnical developments and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    14. Kinyua, Maureen N. & Rowse, Laurel E. & Ergas, Sarina J., 2016. "Review of small-scale tubular anaerobic digesters treating livestock waste in the developing world," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 896-910.
    15. Leam Martes & Michael Köhl, 2022. "Improving the Contribution of Forests to Carbon Neutrality under Different Policies—A Case Study from the Hamburg Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, February.
    16. Yousefpour, Rasoul & You, Bin & Hanewinkel, Marc, 2019. "Simulation of extreme storm effects on regional forest soil carbon stock," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 399(C), pages 39-53.
    17. Yamaura, Yuichi & Yamada, Yusuke & Matsuura, Toshiya & Tamai, Koji & Taki, Hisatomo & Sato, Tamotsu & Hashimoto, Shoji & Murakami, Wataru & Toda, Kenichiro & Saito, Hitoshi & Nanko, Kazuki & Ito, Erik, 2021. "Modeling impacts of broad-scale plantation forestry on ecosystem services in the past 60Â years and for the future," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    18. Peipei Xu & Tao Zhou & Chuixiang Yi & Hui Luo & Xiang Zhao & Wei Fang & Shan Gao & Xia Liu, 2018. "Impacts of Water Stress on Forest Recovery and Its Interaction with Canopy Height," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
    19. Elie Hanna & María R. Felipe-Lucia & Francisco A. Comín, 2024. "Scenario Analysis of Green Infrastructure to Adapt Medium-Size Cities to Climate Change: The Case of Zaragoza, Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, February.
    20. Laurent Augusto & Antra Boča, 2022. "Tree functional traits, forest biomass, and tree species diversity interact with site properties to drive forest soil carbon," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13764-:d:951601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.