IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11472-d913828.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and Selection of Cement Suppliers under the Background of New and Old Driving Energy Conversion in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiuguo Wu

    (School of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Yibai Meng

    (School of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China)

Abstract

Accompanied by the concept of supply-side structural reform and conversion of new and old driving energy to create a new round of economic development in China, cement supplier evaluation and selection are increasingly crucial for concrete production plants, ensuring not only raw material supply with high quality and at a reasonable price but also sustainable and long-term cooperation with suppliers. Given the limitations of the existing approaches, this study proposes a cement supplier evaluation and selection framework based on the combination of the improved FAHP-CRITIC method and VIKOR method. We first develop a cement supplier evaluation and selection index system under the background of new and old driving energy conversion, including eight first-level indicators and twenty-one second-level indicators. The proposed model then uses triangular fuzzy numbers AHP (TFN-AHP) and the improved CRITIC method to calculate subjective and objective weights by replacing the coefficient of variation with standard deviation, uses the ideal solution-based method to determine their combination weights, and combines the VIKOR method to calculate the comprehensive evaluation values of candidate cement suppliers. After that, the proposed approach is applied to evaluate and select ten cement suppliers for concrete production plants, and the results are compared and analyzed with those using the traditional method. The results of the comparison show that the proposed strategy can be scientific and reliable, helping managers to make the right decision under the background of new and old driving energy conversion in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiuguo Wu & Yibai Meng, 2022. "Evaluation and Selection of Cement Suppliers under the Background of New and Old Driving Energy Conversion in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11472-:d:913828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11472/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11472/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Konstantinos G. Aravossis & Vasilis C. Kapsalis & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Theofanis G. Xouleis, 2019. "Development of a Holistic Assessment Framework for Industrial Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Jie Wu & Qingyuan Zhu & Pengzhen Yin & Malin Song, 2017. "Measuring energy and environmental performance for regions in China by using DEA-based Malmquist indices," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 715-735, October.
    3. Antonio Nesticò & Piera Somma, 2019. "Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Methods for the Enhancement of Historical Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.
    4. C S Sarrico, 2001. "Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 52(12), pages 1408-1409, December.
    5. Yi Zhang, 2020. "Construction of Bid Evaluation Index System in Government Public Project Green Procurement in China Based on D-S Evidence Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Claudia Ranocchia & Luca Lambertini, 2021. "Porter Hypothesis vs Pollution Haven Hypothesis: Can There Be Environmental Policies Getting Two Eggs in One Basket?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 78(1), pages 177-199, January.
    7. John Humphrey & Hubert Schmitz, 2002. "How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(9), pages 1017-1027.
    8. Guohua Qu & Zhijie Zhang & Weihua Qu & Zeshui Xu, 2020. "Green Supplier Selection Based on Green Practices Evaluated Using Fuzzy Approaches of TOPSIS and ELECTRE with a Case Study in a Chinese Internet Company," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-32, May.
    9. Seyedmohsen Hosseini & Abdullah Al Khaled, 2019. "A hybrid ensemble and AHP approach for resilient supplier selection," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 207-228, January.
    10. Jing Huang & Hongqi Wang & Jianlong Wu & Zhongji Yang & Xiaobo Hu & Mengmeng Bao, 2020. "Exploring the Key Driving Forces of the Sustainable Intergenerational Evolution of the Industrial Alliance Innovation Ecosystem: Evidence from a Case Study of China’s TDIA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-31, February.
    11. Mihaela Simionescu & Carmen Beatrice Păuna & Mihaela-Daniela Vornicescu Niculescu, 2021. "The Relationship between Economic Growth and Pollution in Some New European Union Member States: A Dynamic Panel ARDL Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    13. Babak Daneshvar Rouyendegh & Şeyda Savalan, 2022. "An Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Hybrid Methodology to Analyze Agricultural Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Rajesh Attri & Akanksha Mishra, 2022. "A hybrid decision making framework based on fuzzy PIPRECIA-fuzzy EDAS for failure mode and effects analysis," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 35(4), pages 473-493.
    15. Gereffi, Gary, 1999. "International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 37-70, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiuguo Wu & Sipeng Wang, 2022. "Evaluation and Temporal-Spatial Evolution of Regional New and Old Driving Force Conversion in Shandong Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiuguo Wu & Sipeng Wang, 2022. "Evaluation and Temporal-Spatial Evolution of Regional New and Old Driving Force Conversion in Shandong Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Epede, Mesumbe Bianca & Wang, Daoping, 2022. "Global value chain linkages: An integrative review of the opportunities and challenges for SMEs in developing countries," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(5).
    3. Jan Fagerberg & Bengt-Åke Lundvall & Martin Srholec, 2018. "Global Value Chains, National Innovation Systems and Economic Development," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(3), pages 533-556, July.
    4. Gideon Ndubuisi & Solomon Owusu, 2021. "How important is GVC participation to export upgrading?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(10), pages 2887-2908, October.
    5. Viktória Endrődi-Kovács & Gábor Kutasi & Anikó Magasházi, 2018. "Visegrád Group Expertise and Position in the Samsung Global Value Chain: A Case Study of Samsung Electronics in the V4 Countries," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2018(1), pages 14-36.
    6. Emanuela Todeva & Ruslan Rakhmatullin, 2016. "Industry Global Value Chains, Connectivity and Regional Smart Specialisation in Europe. An Overview of Theoretical Approaches and Mapping Methodologies," JRC Research Reports JRC102801, Joint Research Centre.
    7. Stefan Pahl & Marcel P. Timmer, 2020. "Do Global Value Chains Enhance Economic Upgrading? A Long View," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(9), pages 1683-1705, July.
    8. Matanda, Margaret Jekanyika & Freeman, Susan, 2009. "Effect of perceived environmental uncertainty on exporter-importer inter-organisational relationships and export performance improvement," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 89-107, February.
    9. Emanuele Bacchiocchi & Massimo Florio & Anna Giunta, 2012. "Internationalisation and the agglomeration effect in the global value chain: the case of Italian automotive suppliers," International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(3), pages 267-290.
    10. repec:ipg:wpaper:2014-496 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Charlotte Keijser & Michiko Iizuka, 2018. "Looking Beyond Global Value Chains in Capacity Development: The Case of the IT-Enabled Service (ITES) Sector in South Africa," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(3), pages 442-461, July.
    12. Anna Giunta & Domenico Scalera & Francesco Trivieri & Jeffrey B. Nugent & Mariarosaria Agostino, 2011. "Firm Productivity, Organizational Choice and Global Value Chain," Working Papers 2011R09, Orkestra - Basque Institute of Competitiveness.
    13. Dutta, Sourish, 2017. "Mechanics of Global Value chains: India’s Perspective," EconStor Preprints 235156, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    14. repec:ilo:ilowps:369852 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Sithanonxay Suvannaphakdy & Alisa DiCaprio, 2021. "Are Asian least developed countries sidelined in advanced manufacturing production networks?," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 35(1), pages 134-152, May.
    16. Jim Huangnan Shen & Luyao Zhang & Chien‐Chiang Lee & Jun Zhang & Leilei Shen, 2021. "Towards a dynamic model of the industrial upgrading with global value chains," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(9), pages 2683-2702, September.
    17. Saon Ray & Smita Miglani, 2018. "Upgrading in the Indian automobile sector: The role of lead firms," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) Working Paper 360, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi, India.
    18. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Huang, Xianjin & Fu, Guole & Chen, Jia-Tsong & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban renewal projects based on a model of hybrid multiple-attribute decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    19. Pierluigi Montalbano & Silvia Nenci & Carlo Pietrobelli, 2018. "Opening and linking up: firms, GVCs, and productivity in Latin America," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 917-935, April.
    20. Siegmann, K.A. & Ivosevic, P. & Visser, O., 2021. "Working like machines: Exploring effects of technological change on migrant labour in Dutch horticulture," ISS Working Papers - General Series 691, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    21. Matias Ramirez & Ian Clarke & Laurens Klerkx, 2018. "Analysing intermediary organisations and their influence on upgrading in emerging agricultural clusters," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(6), pages 1314-1335, September.
    22. Carlo Pietrobelli & Cornelia Staritz, 2018. "Upgrading, Interactive Learning, and Innovation Systems in Value Chain Interventions," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(3), pages 557-574, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11472-:d:913828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.