IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p10532-d896059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Inland Waterway Transport as a Key to Ensure Sustainability: A Case Study of Lithuania

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Plotnikova

    (Department of Business and Rural Development Management, Faculty of Bioeconomy Development, Agriculture Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, 53361 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Milita Vienažindienė

    (Department of Business and Rural Development Management, Faculty of Bioeconomy Development, Agriculture Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, 53361 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Stasys Slavinskas

    (Department of Mechanical, Energy and Biotechnology Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Agriculture Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, 53361 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

To ensure the development of sustainability, the Europe Union (EU) set the goal of becoming a climate-neutral economy by 2050. The EU’s ambitious new target cannot be achieved without the involvement of all modes of transport in order to reduce emissions. According to it, the development of inland waterway transport is a key to ensuring sustainability. Calculations proving the benefits of developing the use of inland waterway transport for ensuring sustainability using the example of the Republic of Lithuania were carried out in this paper. Namely, the calculation of the benefit from the transfer of part of the cargo flow from the busy highway A1 Kaunas–Klaipeda to Neman River (inland waterway of international importance E41). Modeling and detailed comparison using the method of calculating the impact on the main external costs (accidents, air pollution, climate change, noise, habitat damage, congestion) showed that external costs are lower when transporting cargo by river. Increasing the barge capacity from 1000 t to 1800 t reduces the external cost of climate change by 25%. Moreover, replacing diesel with liquefied natural gas can reduce the external costs of climate change by 15% to 25%. The greatest effect is achieved by reducing the level of noise, congestion, and safety. It is possible to enlarge the positive effect by using energy generated by solar or wind power plants for electric-powered ships.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Plotnikova & Milita Vienažindienė & Stasys Slavinskas, 2022. "Development of Inland Waterway Transport as a Key to Ensure Sustainability: A Case Study of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10532-:d:896059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10532/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10532/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Mako & Andrej Dávid & Patrik Böhm & Sorin Savu, 2021. "Sustainable Transport in the Danube Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Tomas Ambra & An Caris & Cathy Macharis, 2019. "Towards freight transport system unification: reviewing and combining the advancements in the physical internet and synchromodal transport research," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(6), pages 1606-1623, March.
    3. Martin Jurkovič & Tomáš Kalina & Ondrej Stopka & Piotr Gorzelanczyk & Borna Abramović, 2021. "Economic Calculation and Operations Research in Terms of LNG Carriage by Water Transport: A Case Study of the Port of Bratislava," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Eef Delhaye & Griet De Ceuster & Filip Vanhove & Sven Maerivoet, 2017. "Internalisation of external costs of transport in Flanders," Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 55-74.
    5. Florian Hofbauer & Lisa-Maria Putz, 2020. "External Costs in Inland Waterway Transport: An Analysis of External Cost Categories and Calculation Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Bianca Borca & Lisa-Maria Putz & Florian Hofbauer, 2021. "Crises and Their Effects on Freight Transport Modes: A Literature Review and Research Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Guido Salazar-Sepulveda & Juan Felipe Espinosa-Cristia & Jonathan Sanhueza-Vergara, 2021. "How to Measure Environmental Performance in Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clara Paola Camargo-Díaz & Edwin Paipa-Sanabria & Julian Andres Zapata-Cortes & Andres Mauricio Briceño-Chaves & Cristian Fernando Serna-Castaño, 2023. "Review of Financing Mechanisms to Promote Decarbonization Alternatives in Rail and Inland Waterway Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Badri GECHBAIA & Amiran TSILOSANI, 2023. "Prospects for intermodal and container transportation for Georgia's integration into the global transport market," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 4(1), pages 85-101, October.
    2. Laima Gerlitz & Christopher Meyer, 2021. "Small and Medium-Sized Ports in the TEN-T Network and Nexus of Europe’s Twin Transition: The Way towards Sustainable and Digital Port Service Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, April.
    3. Peter Mako & Andrej Dávid & Patrik Böhm & Sorin Savu, 2021. "Sustainable Transport in the Danube Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    4. De Moor, Bram J. & Creemers, Stefan & Boute, Robert N., 2023. "Breaking truck dominance in supply chains: Proactive freight consolidation and modal split transport," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    5. Johannes Rentschler & Ralf Elbert & Felix Weber, 2022. "Promoting Sustainability through Synchromodal Transportation: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Fields of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Gohari, Adel & Ahmad, Anuar Bin & Balasbaneh, Ali Tighnavard & Gohari, Ali & Hasan, Razi & Sholagberu, Abdulkadir Taofeeq, 2022. "Significance of intermodal freight modal choice criteria: MCDM-based decision support models and SP-based modal shift policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 46-60.
    7. Hilde Heggen & Yves Molenbruch & An Caris & Kris Braekers, 2019. "Intermodal Container Routing: Integrating Long-Haul Routing and Local Drayage Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-36, March.
    8. Bianca Borca & Lisa-Maria Putz & Florian Hofbauer, 2021. "Crises and Their Effects on Freight Transport Modes: A Literature Review and Research Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Bart Van Riessen & Judith Mulder & Rudy R. Negenborn & Rommert Dekker, 2021. "Revenue management with two fare classes in synchromodal container transportation," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 623-662, September.
    10. Tan, Bing Qing & Xu, Su Xiu & Kang, Kai & Xu, Gangyan & Qin, Wei, 2021. "A reverse Vickrey auction for physical internet (PI) enabled parking management systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    11. Shekwoyemi Gbako & Paraskevadakis Dimitrios & Ren Jun & Wang Jin, 2023. "Digitalisation and Decarbonisation Challenges of Inland Waterways Freight Logistics Transport and their Integration into Regional Supply Chains – A Case Study," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Vanessa Rodríguez Cornejo & Ángel Cervera Paz & Luis López Molina & Víctor Pérez-Fernández, 2020. "Lean Thinking to Foster the Transition from Traditional Logistics to the Physical Internet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Elżbieta Szaruga & Elżbieta Załoga, 2022. "Qualitative–Quantitative Warning Modeling of Energy Consumption Processes in Inland Waterway Freight Transport on River Sections for Environmental Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Chargui, Tarik & Ladier, Anne-Laure & Bekrar, Abdelghani & Pan, Shenle & Trentesaux, Damien, 2022. "Towards designing and operating physical internet cross-docks: Problem specifications and research perspectives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    15. Fan Bu & Heather Nachtmann, 2023. "Literature review and comparative analysis of inland waterways transport: “Container on Barge”," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(1), pages 140-173, March.
    16. Leung, Eric K.H. & Lee, Carmen Kar Hang & Ouyang, Zhiyuan, 2022. "From traditional warehouses to Physical Internet hubs: A digital twin-based inbound synchronization framework for PI-order management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    17. Hafiz Wasim Akram & Samreen Akhtar & Alam Ahmad & Imran Anwar & Mohammad Ali Bait Ali Sulaiman, 2023. "Developing a Conceptual Framework Model for Effective Perishable Food Cold-Supply-Chain Management Based on Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    18. Elżbieta Szaruga & Elżbieta Załoga & Arkadiusz Drewnowski & Paulina Dąbrosz-Drewnowska, 2023. "Convergence of Energy Intensity of the Export of Goods by Rail Transport: Linkages with the Spatial Integration and Economic Condition of Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, April.
    19. Xue Zhang & Yi Lu & Jie Wang & Donghui Yuan & Xianwen Huang, 2023. "Quantifying Road Transport Resilience to Emergencies: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
    20. Yavas, Volkan & Ozkan-Ozen, Yesim Deniz, 2020. "Logistics centers in the new industrial era: A proposed framework for logistics center 4.0," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10532-:d:896059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.