IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9691-d881868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal Patterns and Influencing Factors of Industrial Ecological Efficiency in Northeast China

Author

Listed:
  • Wai Li

    (College of Geographical Science, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, China)

  • Xiaohong Chen

    (College of Geographical Science, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, China)

  • Ying Wang

    (College of Geographical Science, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, China)

Abstract

Scientific measurement of regional industrial ecological efficiency and discussion of the development and changes of its spatiotemporal pattern are of great significance to accelerate the high-quality development of regional economy and coordinate the development of industrial economy and ecological environment. Taking the old industrial bases in Northeast China as the research case and 2004–2019 as the research period, a super-slack-based model was used to measure the industrial ecological efficiency of 34 prefecture-level cities in the region. Meanwhile, the spatial autocorrelation model and the geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR) model were used to analyze the spatiotemporal pattern characteristics and the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of influencing factors. The results showed that: (1) From a time change perspective, the overall industrial ecological efficiency of Northeast China declined, the mean of the 34 cities decreased from 0.675 to 0.612, the number of cities with a high level of industrial ecological efficiency decreased significantly, the number of cities with a low level of industrial ecological efficiency increased significantly, and the development gap between cities within the region widened. (2) In terms of spatial pattern, the difference in the spatial pattern in the east–west direction decreased, and the spatial pattern in the south–north direction was enhanced. The industrial ecological efficiency of the central part of Northeast China gradually became the highest in the whole region. (3) From 2017, the industrial ecological efficiency had stable spatial autocorrelation characteristics. The local spatial autocorrelation was dominated by L-H-type cluster areas in the mountainous regions and L-L-type cluster areas in central and southern Liaoning province. H-H and H-L types had small numbers. In addition, the trend of H-H cities transforming into H-L cities was obvious, and the high level of urban space spillover effect showed good development. (4) The science and technology input, industrial agglomeration intensity, and environmental regulation of the government generally had a promoting effect on the improvement in industrial ecological efficiency, while the economic extroverted degree had a negative impact. The high-value area of science and technology investment and industrial agglomeration intensity concentrated significantly in the central part. The government focused on ecological protection areas and ecologically sensitive areas, and the economic extroverted degree had a significant positive impact on the two major urban agglomerations in central Northeast China. Therefore, differentiating measures should be taken according to the actual situation of each city to improve the industrial ecological efficiency level in Northeast China.

Suggested Citation

  • Wai Li & Xiaohong Chen & Ying Wang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Patterns and Influencing Factors of Industrial Ecological Efficiency in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9691-:d:881868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9691/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9691/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Picazo-Tadeo, Andrés J. & Beltrán-Esteve, Mercedes & Gómez-Limón, José A., 2012. "Assessing eco-efficiency with directional distance functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 798-809.
    2. Lu, Chengpeng & Ji, Wei & Hou, Muchen & Ma, Tianyang & Mao, Jinhuang, 2022. "Evaluation of efficiency and resilience of agricultural water resources system in the Yellow River Basin, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    3. Zhimin Dai & Lu Guo & Zhengyi Jiang, 2016. "Study on the industrial Eco-Efficiency in East China based on the Super Efficiency DEA Model: an example of the 2003–2013 panel data," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(59), pages 5779-5785, December.
    4. Zhonglin Tang & Geng Sun & Min Fu & Chuanhao Wen & Anđelka Plenković-Moraj, 2019. "Research on the Industrial Energy Eco-Efficiency Evolution Characteristics of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in the Temporal and Spatial Dimension, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Panayotou, Theodore, 1997. "Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(4), pages 465-484, November.
    6. Timo Kuosmanen & Mika Kortelainen, 2005. "Measuring Eco‐efficiency of Production with Data Envelopment Analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 9(4), pages 59-72, October.
    7. Quariguasi Frota Neto, J. & Walther, G. & Bloemhof, J. & van Nunen, J.A.E.E. & Spengler, T., 2009. "A methodology for assessing eco-efficiency in logistics networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(3), pages 670-682, March.
    8. Xiaoying Ma, 2021. "The Chinese Economy," Springer Books, in: The Economic Impact of Government Policy on China’s Private Higher Education Sector, chapter 0, pages 31-57, Springer.
    9. J. Elhorst, 2010. "Applied Spatial Econometrics: Raising the Bar," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 9-28.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mengtian Zhang & Huiling Wang, 2023. "Evolution of Industrial Ecology and Analysis of Influencing Factors: The Yellow River Basin in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiangxiang Sun & Lawrence Loh, 2019. "Sustainability Governance in China: An Analysis of Regional Ecological Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Meike Weltin & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Sustainable Intensification Farming as an Enabler for Farm Eco-Efficiency?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(1), pages 315-342, January.
    3. Tianqun Xu & Ping Gao & Qian Yu & Debin Fang, 2017. "An Improved Eco-Efficiency Analysis Framework Based on Slacks-Based Measure Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Silva, Elvira & Magalhães, Manuela, 2023. "Environmental efficiency, irreversibility and the shadow price of emissions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 955-967.
    5. Trinks, Arjan & Mulder, Machiel & Scholtens, Bert, 2020. "An Efficiency Perspective on Carbon Emissions and Financial Performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Alfredsson, Eva & Månsson, Jonas & Vikström, Peter, 2016. "Internalising external environmental effects in efficiency analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 22-31.
    7. Mariam Camarero & Juana Castillo-Giménez & Andrés Picazo-Tadeo & Cecilio Tamarit, 2014. "Is eco-efficiency in greenhouse gas emissions converging among European Union countries?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 143-168, August.
    8. Lucio Cecchini & Francesco Romagnoli & Massimo Chiorri & Biancamaria Torquati, 2023. "Eco-Efficiency and Its Determinants: The Case of the Italian Beef Cattle Sector," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Tifang Ye & Xiuli Xiang & Xiangyu Ge & Keling Yang, 2022. "Research on Green Finance and Green Development Based Eco-Efficiency and Spatial Econometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-29, February.
    10. Mercedes Beltrán-Esteve & José Gómez-Limón & Andrés Picazo-Tadeo & Ernest Reig-Martínez, 2014. "A metafrontier directional distance function approach to assessing eco-efficiency," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 69-83, February.
    11. Bonfiglio, Andrea & Arzeni, Andrea & Bodini, Antonella, 2017. "Assessing eco-efficiency of arable farms in rural areas," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 114-125.
    12. Hoang, Viet-Ngu & Nguyen, Trung Thanh, 2013. "Analysis of environmental efficiency variations: A nutrient balance approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 37-46.
    13. Dyckhoff, Harald & Souren, Rainer, 2022. "Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis and production theory for performance evaluation: Framework and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 795-816.
    14. Joanna Domagała, 2021. "Economic and Environmental Aspects of Agriculture in the EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    15. Emil Georgiev & Emil Mihaylov, 2015. "Economic growth and the environment: reassessing the environmental Kuznets Curve for air pollution emissions in OECD countries," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 29-47, March.
    16. Zhou, Haibo & Yang, Yi & Chen, Yao & Zhu, Joe, 2018. "Data envelopment analysis application in sustainability: The origins, development and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 1-16.
    17. Beltrán-Esteve, Mercedes & Picazo-Tadeo, Andrés J., 2015. "Assessing environmental performance trends in the transport industry: Eco-innovation or catching-up?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 570-580.
    18. Beltrán-Esteve, Mercedes & Picazo-Tadeo, Andrés J., 2017. "Assessing environmental performance in the European Union: Eco-innovation versus catching-up," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 240-252.
    19. Burchart-Korol Dorota & Czaplicka-Kolarz Krystyna, 2013. "Computer Applications in Eco-efficiency Assessment in Logistics," Management, Sciendo, vol. 17(2), pages 232-244, December.
    20. Andrés J. Picazo-Tadeo & Juana Castillo & Mercedes Beltrán-Esteve, 2013. "A dynamic approach to measuring ecological-economic performance with directional distance functions: greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union," Working Papers 1304, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9691-:d:881868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.