IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8702-d863971.html

Performance Evaluation of a Novel Pilot-Scale Wet Electrostatic Precipitator in a Bio-Drying-Assisted Solid Recovered Fuel (SRF) Generation Plant: Particulate Matter (PM) Collection Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Min-Sang Kim

    (Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk University, 32 Dongguk-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10326, Korea)

  • Hongmok Jo

    (Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk University, 32 Dongguk-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10326, Korea)

  • Yeongmi Park

    (Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk University, 32 Dongguk-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10326, Korea)

  • Uijeong Han

    (Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk University, 32 Dongguk-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10326, Korea)

  • Ajay Thapa

    (Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk University, 32 Dongguk-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10326, Korea)

  • Kyunghyun Kim

    (Jinenertech, 21 Gukhoe-daero 62-gil, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 07236, Korea)

  • Du Hyeong Choi

    (Jinenertech, 21 Gukhoe-daero 62-gil, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 07236, Korea)

  • Gwang Jo Park

    (Jinenertech, 21 Gukhoe-daero 62-gil, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 07236, Korea)

  • Si-Kyung Cho

    (Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk University, 32 Dongguk-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10326, Korea)

Abstract

The production of solid recovered fuel (SRF) from sewage sludge has been credited with facilitating Korea’s waste management shift toward a resource circular economy. In this study, a novel pilot-scale wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) was developed and installed in a bio-drying-assisted solid recovered fuel (SRF) generation plant for the first time. To investigate the performance of the novel WESP, various sizes of particulate matter, i.e., total particle matter (PM), particle matter smaller than 10 μm (PM 10 ), and particle matter smaller than 0.1 μm (PM 0.1 ), collection efficiencies were evaluated and demonstrated promising performances. Under optimal operating conditions (flow rate of 5 m 3 /min and an applied voltage of 30 kV), 99.76% PM and 91% PM 10 collection efficiencies were achieved, and the PM concentration was 0.16 mg/m 3 , which met the exhaust emission standard. However, a dramatic increase in PM 0.1 was observed and could be explained by the break-up theory, binary homogenous nucleation, and ion-induced nucleation. The experimental findings could serve as useful information to understand the WESP system.

Suggested Citation

  • Min-Sang Kim & Hongmok Jo & Yeongmi Park & Uijeong Han & Ajay Thapa & Kyunghyun Kim & Du Hyeong Choi & Gwang Jo Park & Si-Kyung Cho, 2022. "Performance Evaluation of a Novel Pilot-Scale Wet Electrostatic Precipitator in a Bio-Drying-Assisted Solid Recovered Fuel (SRF) Generation Plant: Particulate Matter (PM) Collection Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-11, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8702-:d:863971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8702/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8702/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Silva, Valter & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Co-gasification and recent developments on waste-to-energy conversion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 380-398.
    2. Akinori Zukeran & Hidetoshi Sawano & Koji Yasumoto, 2019. "Collection Characteristic of Nanoparticles Emitted from a Diesel Engine with Residual Fuel Oil and Light Fuel Oil in an Electrostatic Precipitator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-9, August.
    3. Hong, Jong Ho & Kim, Jitae & Son, Wonik & Shin, Heeyoung & Kim, Nahyun & Lee, Woong Ki & Kim, Jintae, 2019. "Long-term energy strategy scenarios for South Korea: Transition to a sustainable energy system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 425-437.
    4. Ozcan, Burcu & Tzeremes, Panayiotis G. & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2020. "Energy consumption, economic growth and environmental degradation in OECD countries," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 203-213.
    5. Razmjoo, A. & Gakenia Kaigutha, L. & Vaziri Rad, M.A. & Marzband, M. & Davarpanah, A. & Denai, M., 2021. "A Technical analysis investigating energy sustainability utilizing reliable renewable energy sources to reduce CO2 emissions in a high potential area," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 46-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yao Li & Yugang He, 2024. "Unraveling Korea’s Energy Challenge: The Consequences of Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Energy Use on Economic Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-29, March.
    2. Fengsheng Chien, 2024. "The effect of renewable energy and economic conditions on the environmental degradation in China," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(1), pages 289-311, February.
    3. Kim, Sunwoo & Choi, Yechan & Park, Joungho & Adams, Derrick & Heo, Seongmin & Lee, Jay H., 2024. "Multi-period, multi-timescale stochastic optimization model for simultaneous capacity investment and energy management decisions for hybrid Micro-Grids with green hydrogen production under uncertainty," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 190(PA).
    4. Małgorzata Sztorc, 2022. "The Implementation of the European Green Deal Strategy as a Challenge for Energy Management in the Face of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    6. Riza Radmehr & Samira Shayanmehr & Ernest Baba Ali & Elvis Kwame Ofori & Elżbieta Jasińska & Michał Jasiński, 2022. "Exploring the Nexus of Renewable Energy, Ecological Footprint, and Economic Growth through Globalization and Human Capital in G7 Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Jintao Zhang & Zhen Yang & Li Meng & Lu Han, 2022. "Environmental regulations and enterprises innovation performance: the role of R&D investments and political connections," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 4088-4109, March.
    8. Jungmin An & Dong-Kwan Kim & Jinyeong Lee & Sung-Kwan Joo, 2021. "Least Squares Monte Carlo Simulation-Based Decision-Making Method for Photovoltaic Investment in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    9. Khalid Jamil & Dunnan Liu & Rana Faizan Gul & Zahid Hussain & Muhammad Mohsin & Guangyu Qin & Farman Ullah Khan, 2022. "Do remittance and renewable energy affect CO2 emissions? An empirical evidence from selected G-20 countries," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(5), pages 916-932, August.
    10. Ju-Hee Kim & Young-Kuk Kim & Seung-Hoon Yoo, 2023. "Does Proximity to a Power Plant Affect Housing Property Values of a City in South Korea? An Empirical Investigation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Usman, Muhammad & Makhdum, Muhammad Sohail Amjad, 2021. "What abates ecological footprint in BRICS-T region? Exploring the influence of renewable energy, non-renewable energy, agriculture, forest area and financial development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 12-28.
    12. Yang, Sungwoong & Cho, Hyun Mi & Yun, Beom Yeol & Hong, Taehoon & Kim, Sumin, 2021. "Energy usage and cost analysis of passive thermal retrofits for low-rise residential buildings in Seoul," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    13. Zwickl-Bernhard, Sebastian & Neumann, Anne, 2024. "Modeling Europe’s role in the global LNG market 2040: Balancing decarbonization goals, energy security, and geopolitical tensions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    14. Gabbrielli, Roberto & Barontini, Federica & Frigo, Stefano & Bressan, Luigi, 2022. "Numerical analysis of bio-methane production from biomass-sewage sludge oxy-steam gasification and methanation process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    15. Silviu Nate & Yuriy Bilan & Mariia Kurylo & Olena Lyashenko & Piotr Napieralski & Ganna Kharlamova, 2021. "Mineral Policy within the Framework of Limited Critical Resources and a Green Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-32, May.
    16. Natalia Larionova & Julia Varlamova & Julia Kolesnikova, 2021. "Does Digitalization Reduce Electricity Consumption? Evidence from Spatial Analysis," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(2), pages 413-419.
    17. Lei Wang & Sana Ullah & Muhammad Tayyab Sohail, 2024. "Exchange rate volatility and green growth in China: does nonlinearity matter?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 1-26, December.
    18. Michael L. Polemis & Mike G. Tsionas, 2023. "The environmental consequences of blockchain technology: A Bayesian quantile cointegration analysis for Bitcoin," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 1602-1621, April.
    19. Vaziri Rad, Mohammad Amin & Kasaeian, Alibakhsh & Niu, Xiaofeng & Zhang, Kai & Mahian, Omid, 2023. "Excess electricity problem in off-grid hybrid renewable energy systems: A comprehensive review from challenges to prevalent solutions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 538-560.
    20. Mousavi, Seyed Ali & Toopshekan, Ashkan & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Delpisheh, Mostafa, 2023. "Comprehensive exergetic performance assessment and techno-financial optimization of off-grid hybrid renewable configurations with various dispatch strategies and solar tracking systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 40-63.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8702-:d:863971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.